Preview

John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism As The Best Form Of Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1892 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism As The Best Form Of Government
In the timeless field of philosophy, a common topic explored is the differentiating views on government, society, and the state of nature. Numerous philosophers have shared their perspective on why certain forms of government are superior to others, and why other forms are ineffective. One well-known theory is utilitarianism, which is mostly known for the developments made by John Stuart Mill, who focused on achieving the greatest amount of happiness possible. Utilitarianism can be considered as the best form of government because it acts as a guideline for just conduct, allows a peaceful society to develop, and provides maximum amount of opportunities for happiness. While there are many philosophers who disagree with this view, the diverse …show more content…
This guidance can be found in Mill’s three main principles of utilitarianism, which states that actions can only be morally judged based on its consequences, the sole importance in assessing consequences is the balance of happiness, and everyone’s happiness should be valued as equally important1. The guideline is also supplemented through the two types of utilitarianism; act and rule utilitarianism. The original utilitarianism theory is act utilitarianism, which revolves around just actions and moral decisions. Even if that particular option seems undesirable, such as breaking a promise, it is still the best thing to do according to the theory1. Therefore, utilitarianism does provide multiple sources that are valuable to individuals who seek guidance in determining what the best course of action …show more content…
Usually told to see what kind of moral decisions people would make in a difficult situation, this scenario consists of an individual having to choose between two routes the train can go. Route one allows the 500 people on board to die, and route two means that the individual’s child dies. This example shows that although nobody would choose to kill their own child, it would be the right thing to do because they are saving more people, therefore bringing the greatest amount of happiness. It also demonstrates in choosing right actions, the one that doesn’t appear the most desirable may be the most

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The most important part of the Mill’s utilitarianism chapter is the Greatest Happiness Principle. The Greatest Happiness Principle means the rule of human conduct. This…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Standards are necessary within an organization to promote discipline, production, and efficiency. Recently, the Sergeant Major of the Army visited the Sergeants Major Academy and the focus of his presentation was really about Army Standards. The Sergeant Major’s message got me thinking about Army standards and the inconsistent application of these standards throughout the Army, specifically the ethical dilemmas that arise due to this inconsistency. If an organization’s standards are applied inconsistently, that organization’s culture changes and allows room for unethical application of those standards. In the Army we see this inconsistent application of standards in the areas of height and weight standards, the APFT, the tattoo policy, application of punishment through the UCMJ, and in unit reporting.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history philosophers have introduced new ideas and belief systems into society in hopes to better the world they lived in. Many philosophers have introduced ideas that are still in practice in American government. While popular belief among those trying to pave a path forward was that government, as it stood, was tyrannical and overly restrictive, however John Stuart Mill believed that through government happiness and freedom can be achieved.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his Essay Utilitarianism Mill elaborates on Utilitarianism as a moral theory and responds to misconceptions about it. Utilitarianism, in Mill's words, is the view that »actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.«1 In that way, Utilitarianism offers an answer to the fundamental question Ethics is concerned about: ‘How should one live?' or ‘What is the good or right way to live?'.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Focusing on act utilitarianism, this direct form works in maxims, expanding the contrast between right and wrong. “An act is right and just in its consequences for human happiness are at least good as any alternative available to the agent” (9). Thus, it is your duty to do the optimal act in a situation because anything other than the best act is a wrong act. Furthermore, Mills also comments that it is considered a “righteous” act if the consequences are just as good or better than any other action. Staying within the ideas of right or wrong, or when decisions seem to commonly be referred to as “black or white,” there is also an ideal of proportions to consider. Remember that the act is right is if brings happiness to the most people, but one is incapable of pleasing every person in every situation. Thus, Mills refers to the “Proportionality Doctrine” to tell what makes an act right or wrong. The Proportionality Doctrine states that acts are right if they promote happiness, or…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mill’s Utilitarianism, he examines what determines an action to be considered right or wrong, his own version of the hedonistic utilitarianism argument. He claims that these qualities, including the quantity, are an important factor in determining, when included in the consequences, the criteria of an action. The consequences of ones actions are an important element in society, one that is based on cause and effect. When an action is committed, it is important for an individual to consider what the consequences will be, regardless of the motives, because when the action has gone through, the consequences will be held in th spotlight by society, regardless of the motives of the…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. According to Sandel, utilitarianism fails to respect individual right and freedom (Sandel, 2009, p. 37). The issue with utilitarianism is that it will do whatever to maximize utility and anything to prevent pain or suffering (Sandel, 2009, p. 34). An example that was mentioned in the book was throwing Christians to the lions, as you can see it fails to respect the individual rights of the Christians. The lions and the crowd watching are maximizing their pleasure while the Christians are suffering pain. The pleasure of the lion and crowd outweighs the pain and suffering of the Christians. The second objection that Sandel has to utilitarianism is a common currency of value, which breaks everything up in a cost benefit analysis (Sandel, 2009,…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill was considered a Utilitarian. The philosophy of Utilitarianism is that an action should be decided by what is best for society. Mill’s philosophy was in part developed by his upbringing as a child. His childhood was restricted and he was raised in an enviroment where is emotionally needs were not met. Also his father was a friend of Jeremy Bentham. Bentham was a philosopher credited with starting the beginings of the Utiltarianism philosophy. He focused on the relationships between the social classes and working towards social reform. His philosophy focused more on social conditions and human behavior than previous philosophies had. He looked at practical solutions for societies problems and less on the metaphysical aspects…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mill’s Utilitarianism states that in order to be moral, one must make decisions based upon the greatest happiness. In…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill Utilitarianism Essay

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill's Utilitarianism brings an extended concept of Bentham's philosophy and a response to Kant's deontological philosophy. The basic concept of utilitarianism is to act in such a way as to create the most pleasure or the least pain. This is the guideline because, as Mill states, we desire happiness; happiness is maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain. However, is utilitarianism viable? There are many arguments for it, but just as many against.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mill’s study of ethical action holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes overall "happiness" seems to be more logical, although we all will have our own opinions on morality. Morality can be just a matter of consequences and the act will be “right” or “wrong” according to its penalties or values. Morality is not just a matter of what a person says is right, or because the culture or people of the universe agree with you. As stated in the text, Mill’s criticism of Kant is “the rightness of an act must not be divorced from its consequences”, with right meaning maximizing the happiness of mankind. For every action we do there is a consequence and it is up to ourselves to make the consequence result in happiness. Naturally people will do what feels right or what we may think has the least consequences, which is ultimately our pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain. Each person's happiness counts as much as anyone else's; hence, Utilitarianism is not a form of ethical or moral egoism in that it does not require us to pursue our own happiness. When deciding to so what is “right” or moral we will determine alternative courses of action; weigh out the consequences of each action and then value to the consequences of each action based on how much happiness is destroyed or produced. We will choose which action provides most benefits and least consequences; therefore we chose actions that result in overall…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good and Evil in High Noon

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory most often ascribed to the philosopher John Stuart Mill. The utilitarian theory suggests actions and/or intentions are not right or wrong; rather the morality of a choice or act is determined by the outcome or result. Utilitarian’s believe outcomes can be determined in advance of an action and the ethical choice is one which provides the best result or most happiness for the greatest number of individuals (e.g., pleasure, happiness, health, knowledge, satisfaction). The utility theory asserts morality is a means to some other end, it does not stand on its own as being intrinsically moral.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism, Mill discusses the concept of utilitarianism, defined as, “The doctrine that actions are right if they are useful of for the benefit of a majority.” Mill elaborates on this idea and within the second chapter of his essay, addresses many misconceptions towards this view. Addressing the given quote, one misconception made is that utilitarianism degrades the meaning of life. Some people oppose this view because they think that it is wrong to say that there is no better end than pleasure and freedom from pain. Mill replies to this by saying that there are different qualities of pleasure. He professes about a higher quality pleasure being one which you would choose above another pleasure even if it meant pain…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mm Approach

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Under the assumptions stated above, MM argue that neither the firm paying dividends nor the shareholders receiving the dividends will be adversely affected by firms paying either too little or too much dividends. They have used the arbitrage process to show that the division of profits between dividends and retained earnings is irrelevant from the point of view of the shareholders. They have shown that given the investment opportunities, a firm will finance these either by ploughing back profits of if pays dividends, then will raise an equal amount of new share capital externally by selling new shares. The amount of dividends paid to existing shareholders will be replaced by new share capital raised externally.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays