Preview

Johnny Cade Murder Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
421 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Johnny Cade Murder Essay
Johnny Cade has killed Bob Sheldon and is now on trial for his murder. However, questions have risen regarding to what degree are Johnny’s actions justifiable? Should the defendant be accused of first degree murder, second degree murder, involuntary manslaughter, or is he simply not guilty? I believe that Johnny Cade is guilty of second degree murder. We have enough evidence to confirm that Johnny is the one who killed Bob Sheldon, so we know for a fact that he is guilty to some degree. For example, on page 56, Johnny says to Pony, “I killed him.”...”I killed that boy”. In addition, Johnny heads back to town to turn himself in after hiding out in Windrixville for about a week. This action of his also supports the reasoning behind ruling out not guilty as a viable option for his punishment. Furthermore, the definition of first degree murder involves premeditation, deliberate planning, and malice. However, there is no evidence supporting that Johnny Cade made use of any of the previously mentioned elements of murder before killing Bob Sheldon. Johnny acted strictly …show more content…
This may have been true if Bob was the one drowning Pony. It is not stated in the text what Bob was doing while Pony was being drowned, but we know that he wasn’t the one potentially becoming a murderer. For this reason, I don’t believe that killing Bob was an act of involuntary manslaughter. In conclusion, second degree murder is classified as killing another with malice, but without premonition or deliberate planning. In other words, it involves killing someone intentionally and spontaneously; the killer didn’t plan it out in the past. It is true that Johnny hadn’t planned the killing of Bob Sheldon. In contrast, we know that Bob wasn’t the one about to kill Pony. Therefore, I believe that the murder of Bob may have been intentional, given the past history between these two

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In accordance to the Penal Law, Murder in the first degree is defined “With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the death of such person… the victim was killed while the defendant was in the course of committing / attempting to commit in furtherance of robbery [or other such felonies.]{§125.27(1)(a)(vii)}” This is also known as Felony Murder. Robbery is also defined as forcible stealing.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    mental state for first-degree murder ecause he was responding to his wife's request and was…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 24, 1992, Ramon Flores was working at a gas station that was getting robbed and was shot and killed. The man charged with his murder was Michael R. Pulido. He was charged with first degree murder along the felony murder law. That law states that killing during the act of a felony, in this case a robbery, is automatically first degree murder. The way I have interpreted the facts of this case, the defendant was the one who pulled the trigger and point toward him as the killer. To come to this decision, the jury had to conclude that the defendant had intent to commit a felony, killed during the act of a dangerous felony, and that the victims death was a foreseeable outcome of the felony.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Issue: Kelbel argued that the district court failed to instruct the jury that in order to convict him of first-degree murder, past pattern child abuse, they must find beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed…

    • 603 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    McHugh J put forward that the fatal wound could not be determined as to whether it was caused in the first instance or the second instance, and that the wording used by O’Bryan J was reflective of whether or not the jury found the Appellant had inflicted the fatal blow in the first or second instances and that if that the jury had in fact found that the appellant had inflicted the fatal blow in the first instance that provocation could not be a defence in the second instance.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Is there error in the court denying a jury instructions on criminally negligent homicide, instead instructing on reckless manslaughter, which alleges the defendant had intent to kill, when there is enough evidence to support the theory the defendant’s conduct was unintentional.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jack, Bert and Pratt

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case, the court dismissed the charge of the attempt of murder of Bert because Jack could not have killed Bert due to the malfunction of his gun. The court was not right by dismissing the attempt murder charge because he had the intent to kill Bert and he even fired his weapon towards him but ended up killing Pratt. All the tree elements of an attempt were present plus it also meets the mens rea of attempt. It meets the mens rea because Jack intentionally performed an act that was proximate to the completion of a crime, and by possessing the intent or purpose to achieve a criminal objective. In addition meets the actus reus of attempt because he came extremely close to the commission of the crime. In addition he killed Pratt while pointing the gun at Bert with the intent to kill him.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jack, Bert and Pratt

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this case, clearly, this was a complete attempt toward the commission of Murder as it relates to Bert. Jack has accomplished all of the steps toward murdering Bert; bringing a gun to the scene, approaching the car, and firing the gun in the direction of the Bert. His intent was clearly shown when he fired the shot that killed Pratt, for which he will be appropriately charged with murder. (West Law Corporation, 2010) But in the case of Bert, the gun jammed, and he was unable to finish the criminal act against Bert, and fled the location. He didn’t abandon his intent to kill Bert, which could possibly have been a…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    2. The Twelve jurors are given the job, by the judge, of deciding whether a teenage boy is innocent or guilty of killing his father. They must separate the facts from the fancy and provide a verdict of guilty if there is no reasonable doubt to the claims, or non-guilty if there is reasonable doubt. The decision must be unanimous. The charge against the defendant is Murder in the first degree – premeditated homicide (death sentence).…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As defined from the Merriam-Webster dictionary online, involuntary manslaughter is, “the unlawful killing of a human being without express or implied malice.” According to this definition, what Billy did was not murder, a capital crime, and therefore they should not have ruled him guilty. This was Billy’s first offense to anyone. Charming, young and sweet, Billy never made any evil action or verbal attack…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Cold Blood Essay

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Richard Eugene Hickock and Perry Smith were found guilty of murder in the first degree and their punishment is death. "Can there be a single doubt in your minds regarding the guilt in your defendants? No! Regardless of who pulled the trigger on Richard Eugene Hickock's shotgun, both men are equally guilty... penalty-death." (303)…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When people in Texas die as the result of another’s actions, it is considered homicide. While not all forms of homicide are illegal, a number are, and may result in serious legal charges. These include criminally negligent homicide, manslaughter and murder. In order to help protect their rights, it behooves people to understand the difference between these offenses in the state of Texas.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many different legal categories of homicide. Two of these categories are; first degree murder and second degree murder. If the person acted with ‘malice aforethought’ or, planned to kill another individual and proceeded to carry out the act, then it is considered first degree murder. Shooting or stabbing someone in the heart, would be considered first degree murder, as the offender deliberately acted with malice aforethought, and therefore intended to kill the victim. Second degree murder is a homicide in which, the person did not intend to kill the victim, but still wanted to hurt…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have all gathered here today to bring justice to a poor old man, who was murdered in his own house. Everyone in the court was brought here to decide if this man is guilty of being insane or guilty of murder. The murder confused to stocking this old man and claimed that he killed him because of his eye. The murders cut of all his limbs after killing him and hide him under the floorboard. When police came to his house he confused after a few minutes of silence. After a few days, lawyers, jurors, a judge, an expert, a witness, the murder, and I have all gathered here to bring justice to this old man. From my point of view, as the documenter, this trail seems like a tough decision. As of now I feel like the murder is guilty of 1st degree murder. Now at 1:44 PM the prosecution lawyer begins.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    juvenile justice system

    • 6284 Words
    • 35 Pages

    think it would be fair for you to be punished the same way an adult…

    • 6284 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Better Essays