Preview

Judicial Accountability N Responsible Media- in India

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3660 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Judicial Accountability N Responsible Media- in India
Judicial Accountability - an Illusion or a Reality

In a ‘democratic republic’ power with accountability of the individual enjoying it, is essential to avert disaster for any democratic system. The accountability must be comprehensive to include not only the politicians, but also the bureaucrats, judges and everyone invested with public power. Power and position in the society come attendant with responsibility, and every incumbent of a public office must remain constantly accountable to the people, who are the repository of political sovereignty. Accountability of the judiciary at every level, in a democracy cannot be doubted. The need of an effective mechanism for the enforcement of judicial accountability, when needed, is a felt need and must be accepted.The method by which judges are selected has become a matter of considerable concern for the citizens of our state. Although judicial elections may always has been important and vital process, the selection process is now coming under particular scrutiny. Some believe that although imperfect, the process in place works well enough to need only minor adjustments; others claim that a major overhaul, even scrapping, of the system is necessary. Certainly attention to the issue is warranted: The provisions in place for judicial accountability all threatened by the spread and deepening of problems that, if left unattended, will erode the public's confidence in our judiciary.
Objective ---- A democracy is highlighted by the fact that each and every part of it is accountable to each other. In this situation, an independant judiciary which is the backbone of the efficient functioning of the democracy in India has come under a lot of scrutiny. How far do we go to ensure the independance of judiciary when transparency is the shrill and persistent demand of the Time. The judiciary – especially the higher judiciary – has put itself up on Cloud Nine, wrapping itself in a cloak of inviolabilityHow are Judges appointed?

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 6 Paper

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. The state of Florida is amongst 16 other states that selects judges through the method “appointment-retention election”. A method in which a proposing group shows names to the governor, who then makes the appointment; appointees need to win a retention vote in the next election. It is not necessarily a good system because the selection is placed in the hands of the judges or attorneys who comprise the nominating committee and the governor, with only a impression of voter input. Reorganizers argue that the plan eliminate judges from politics and saves the electorate the problem of voting on judicial candidates when they know little about their professional qualifications.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This criterion of judge selection through the relevant commission boosts the independence of the judicial arm of the government through an elimination of the partisan politics, political sponsorship as well as the influence of money when compared to the method that is currently in use.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oregon Judicial Selection

    • 2837 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Herein, lies the first faultiness in Oregon’s judicial selection process. According to Oregon Secretary of State, approximately eighty five percent of recent Oregon judges have been appointed and less than twenty percent of Gubernatorial appointments are being contested. Since 1983, there have been only two judges that were defeated in contested elections. (Yamaka)…

    • 2837 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Objective: Examine the potential impact on judicial independence that results from the election of judges versus the appointment of judges.”…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zane Singletary 09/16/2014 ENGL-101-16 Ms. Kimberly B. Ward Should Judges be Appointed or Elected Introduction and Outline Since the United States Democracy was first established, legislators and constituents have asked the question “Should judges be appointed or elected?”. Many state legislators have argued that since judges make decisions that directly affect constituents, they must be elected and nonpartisan races are held for judgeships. On the other hand, the United States Constitution states that all federal judges shall be appointed to the bench and have lifetime tenure so as to preserve judicial independence. Although this policy may sound admirable, this method oftentimes leads to higher executives appointing their personal comrades,…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Text’s concern: power as it is used to affect who will hold government office and how government will behave…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By making decisions regarding the interest of the society the courts assume responsibilities that belong exclusively to the legislative and executive branches of government. The Supreme Court justices may rule based on what is in their best interest while saying that they are deciding for the good of the society. Moreover, when the Supreme Court justices are appointed, not elected, they may not be the representatives of the public’s view. As a result, judges begin making policy decisions about social or political changes society should make and become “unelected legislators.” By freely interpreting the meaning of the Constitution, the communities’ confidence in the Supreme Court will be undermined. When judicial activism in the Supreme Court wields too much power, it can eventually destruct the essence of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People have been ambivalent about the real meaning of the democracy and about who was entitled to represent whom and what had to be done when representatives disregarded those whom they were supposed to represent. But there was the belief that good government was government by representatives. Representative democracy supported the freedom to express one’s opinion which was not only among the represented themselves, but also between representatives and those whom they are supposed to represent (John Keane, 2009). It was said to introduce competition for power that in turn people who were elected representatives were able to try their political competence before others. The earliest champions of representative democracy represented practical expression of a simple reality: it wasn’t possible for all of the people to be involved all of the time, even if they were so preoccupied in the business of government.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Selection

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The disadvantages of the judicial selection by election system are almost all associated with the campaign process. The main issue is that the campaigns are largely funded by corporations and organizations that are likely to appear in court.i This causes a lot of distrust among the people because the majority believes the campaign contributions influence judge’s decisions. Whether the contributions actually influence decisions or not, the people have lost some faith in the judicial which is the biggest problem. Also, the campaigns are problematic because usually whoever raises…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judicial reforms allow all Russians to be equal before the law and receive the same treatment. ‘The post of the chairmen, assistant chairmen and of other members of the judiciary may be filled only by persons who have a certificate from a university or of higher education, testifying to a completion of a course in jurisprudence…’ This ensures that the members of the judicial are people with sufficient knowledge to give a fair trial and it is based on merit and not hereditary. It also encourages people to be more educated. This reform is one of the most successful of the great reforms and it transformed Russian judiciary from one of the worst to one of the best in the civilized world. Furthermore, ‘jurors are elected from among all classes of inhabitants’ which help ensure fairness and equality. This makes the legal system less corrupt and allows the lower class people to feel that they will be able to attain justice since the jurors are not only composed of people with…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of the independent judiciary is to protect citizens against unjust and arbitrary use of power by the government as well as any other individuals or organizations. It is vital for this judiciary to be independent as if it was not then the outcomes it comes up with would not be just and so the whole system is undermined.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In modern times, the independence of the judiciary is guaranteed by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, s.3. In order to try to promote the independence of the judiciary, the selection process is designed to minimize political interference. The process focuses on senior members of the judiciary rather than on politicians. Part 2 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 aims to increase diversity among the judiciary.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Political Representation

    • 2710 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Today, in countries which choose representative democracy as a form of state, ordinary citizens have the right to one man-one vote and thus they, in regular elections, vote for a political candidate or a political party which they want to be their own representative. This form of state is called ‘representative democracy’ or ‘modern constitutional representative government’ or political representation in general. Nowadays, the legitimacy and authority of the representative government is regarded as resulting from its being an expression of the will of the people. However, this expression as the source of the legitimate authorization for public acts is indirect: citizens transfer it to their representatives as intermediaries. The representatives as intermediaries are those who make the people’s will present on its behalf. Thus, political representation has its theoretical scheme two political actors: the citizens or the people and the representative. This scheme of political representation which looks simple actually has many political implications for political actors and processes. My final paper is concerned with exploring what the modern terminology of political representation means and what implications it involves.…

    • 2710 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Facti Gabernaculum Et Vita

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This are, the incontrovertible truth(s) people, have to know. However, the issue that I chose to discuss has rather lapse the time of freshness in the people’s mind to give their reaction and sentiments pertinent to the anomaly wherewith a governmental institution is involved, pabaun and pasalubong system, primarily because of the plurality of issues arising. Causing clogged dockets in the judiciary specifically, in every courtroom. Issues like corruption, a public official malversating government coffers, deprivation of the constitutional and civil rights of the people, which is inalienably and imprescriptibly inherent from the point of their existence, etc., etc., etc.…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    speedy recovery of cases

    • 10639 Words
    • 43 Pages

    Delay in the dispensation of justice is regarded as a main latch in the judicial system. The unusual delay both in the trial of civil and criminal cases has made justice an imaginary matter. Delay in disposal of cases on the one way makes justice expensive and on the other way long pendency contributes to the material change of the subject matter of the disputes and lack of both oral and documentary evidence resulting in justice being either impossible or valueless which ultimately indulges corruption. Delay in disposal of cases makes room for non-confident attitude of the people towards the judicial system of the country. There is no other alternative to make the judicial system meaningful and trustworthy to the people without…

    • 10639 Words
    • 43 Pages
    Powerful Essays