Preview

JUDICIAL CONTROL OVER ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION IN PREVENTIVE DETENTION

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4327 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
JUDICIAL CONTROL OVER ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION IN PREVENTIVE DETENTION
Judicial control over administrative discretion in the case of preventive detention.

SCOPE
The scope of the project relates to analysing the role of judicial control over administrative discretion in the case of preventive detention.

OBJECTIVES & AIMS
To find out the reason for conferment of discretionary power on administrative authorities.

To analyse the grounds where administration discretion can be challenged.

To analyse the system of preventive detention in India.

HYPOTHESIS
Judiciary review on exercise of discretion in the case of preventive detention

CHAPTER -I
INTRODUCTION
Administrative has to function according to the law and the constitution. It is a fundamental duty laid down against every administrative action that it should not violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution. For this purpose, the judiciary has an important role to play in protecting the citizen against the arbitrary exercise of administrative action. In India, the judiciary has been given an apex place. However, it is a general rule that court should not interfere with the administrative functions and actions taken by administrative authorities in exercise of discretionary powers. It means that judiciary has no direct control over the administrative actions. Judiciary can act only when their intervention is sought. Infact judicial intervention is restrictive in nature and limited in its scope. Irrespective of this defect, the Supreme Court and high court have been intervening in the administrative actions by way of public interest litigation. Even sometimes, when the situation demands Supreme Court and high courts have authority to take up cases suo moto (on its own motion).

CHAPTER-II
CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS
1.1 DISCRETIONARY POWERS
1.1.1 Judicial control of administrative discretion Discretion means to act according to desire or choose from given options. Administrative discretion means choosing



Bibliography: EDITION NO. 2007 Treatise on administrative law M.P.Jain, 1996 edition, vol.1 Wadhwa and Nagpur.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rochin Case Summary

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is hard to tell what the future holds in respect to the justice system since it is not often determined by one’s intentions, but the events people encounter as they purse their goals. Therefore, the decision of this case may affect a criminal justice professional I the sense he or she might want to maintain a strong and focused philosophy. This may involve the consideration of both crime control and due process models when dealing with some cases because the use of the two appears to be the best strategy to deal with crime in the…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The criminal justice system in any country in the world will not be complete without the prison. Some authorities and governments view the prison as a place of punishment, while others view it as a venue where a member of society can rehabilitate, and eventually be reunited with society. Whatever a person’s view may be, the prison will always be a part of the criminal justice system. This paper will focus on the influence of leadership, culture, systems, law, and influential stakeholders in prisons. This paper will also focus on the positive or negative influences of each…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, there are two main competing models of justice, the Due Process Model, and the Crime Control Method. The Due Process Model (DPM) is known as obstacle course justice with an ideology that relies on the formal structure of the law and legal guilt. The DPM’s primary goals are to protect the due process rights of the accused and limiting the powers of the state. It runs completely with an underlying assumption of innocence, making it not so effective at all times. The Crime Control Method (CCM), on the other hand is known as assembly line justice. It has an ideology that centers on efficiency and effectiveness of the system and factual guilt. The CCM’s primary goals are to protect society from crime and to control the behavior of the community. This process uses and informal fact finding process through the police and prosecutors. Also contrary to the DPM the CCM operates under a presumption of guilt. The CCM of justice is focused on detaining the accused and securing convictions, making it very effective in preventing crime however somehow you have to step on some toes. These two models and methods occur all the time in the criminal justice system we see today, and there is much controversy behind which process should dominate. In 1984 Sherman and Berk published their overall case study on “The Specific Deterrent Effects of Arrest for Domestic Assault”. This study supported a more CCM ideology of justice. However in 1988 Binder and Meeker published an article critiquing the methods and conclusions of the original study, offering a counterpoint.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discretion In Cjs

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Discretion plays an indispensable role in the criminal justice system (CJS). Discretion is the judgment or decision implemented through values, facts, and principles. In the CJS, it is the authority given to a decision maker to decide between alternatives or no alternatives. Discretion can be used by police in the area of the criminal investigation process. Its role is continuous from sentencing judgments to the point of detaining offenders in prison past their sentencing period. Discretion also allows individuals’ circumstances to be considered, as the law at times can be considered a blunt measurement in delivering an alternative. This demonstrates that discretion plays an important role in the CJS to enforce the law, whilst taking into account the rights of individuals.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Discretionary authority: The right to choose what action to take; permission to act. Each facet of the criminal justice system has its own level of discretionary authority. Whether or not each facet wants to acknowledge it, each facet eventually answers to the public. From a police officer writing a ticket or deciding to pursue a fleeing suspect to the probation/parole officer filing a violation of probation or parole – and the organizations in between – each facet must adhere to the policy and procedures for its own agency.…

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Prison Service encompasses three central aims; holding prisoners securely, decrease risk of offending and lastly offer safe, well-ordered institutions in which prisoners are treated humanely, decently and lawfully (Cavadino and Dignan, 2007, p.193). When the state incarcerates, it must accept accountability for the basic care of those it detains. Although prisoners should not expect luxuries during their time of incarceration, they should not be deprived of the basic goods and comforts of life. Certification of access to enough goods should be available to help them develop as the citizens expected to be. Lord Justice Woolf (1991) claimed three necessities for the prison system to maintain steadiness: security, control and justice. In terms…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most debated current events that have had a hold on America and the world are the prisons of Guantanamo Bay. Since the opening of the prisons there have been reported stories of torture on prisoners, inmates being force fed and due process rights being taken away. In this essay, we will examine Guantanamo Bay from the beginnings, to the legal issues by reviewing landmark Supreme Court cases, to the world wide opinions and finally the future of GITMO. After much research, we will review how I came to my belief, that the holding of prisoners in Guantanamo Bay is unconstitutional and that the torture must be stopped immediately.…

    • 3613 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human rights have been violated due to the conditions of these detentions; restricted access to services; and restricted access to judicial review.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Definition of judicial restraint, mention Marbury V Madison (1803). Set out argument strict constructionists argue that the SC should stick to the original intentions of the FF whilst loose constructionists argue that the SC must reinterpret the Constitution in order to move with the times and bring it up-to-date. Judicial restraint has an impact on many members of US society that are not protected under the original Constitution. Main- All decisions whether restrained or activist have huge political significance. E.g. abortion, Rights of African Americans, etc. If restrained, the court can turn away cases and choose not to even hear them. The SC can pick and choose (they only choose between 90-100 cases to hear a year). Liberals argue…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The mandatory detention of children is one of the most cruel and inhumane rules of modern day Australia. It is unfair and cruel for the children that have to undergo through this kind of trauma as it mentally and physically affects them in a way that cannot be reversed. It handicaps them, and when they finally do get released, they will find that life is much harder for them.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that the judicial restraint philosophy is more appropriate for federal judges to follow because, unlike judicial activism, it does not allow judges to expand vague Constitutional principles to fit their own viewpoint and principles. Judicial restraint does not authorize judges to interpret Constitutional texts and laws (conservative or liberal interpretation) in order to serve their own principles, policies, and considered estimates of the vital needs of contemporary society. The judicial restraint policy also ensures that separation of powers is applied justly so that different branches of government do not intervene with the power of the other branch. Also, because the Stare Decisis has a huge impact on future decisions and precedent,…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the criminal justice system, discretion is often performed by the police, prosecutors, judges and juries, correctional officials and paroling authorities. They are the ones to decide who should be the ones for criminal penalties and what kind of punishments they should be given. For example: Police are the ones who decides which person has committed grievous crimes and that the person should be arrested or not. They also decide on enforcing specific laws, examine detailed crimes, investigate crime scene locations and search criminals and victims. Prosecutors are the ones to file charges against someone with complaints. They are the ones to make an official decision about a problem or dispute. They look for a formal accusation of a serious before presenting to the grand jury. And they have the authority for reducing charges for someone. Judges or magistrates are the one to set up bails and state of affairs to release a prisoner. They accept pleas, determine criminal behavior, release paroles, enforce sentences and withdraw probation. Correctional Officials are securities who maintain protection and precautions within one institution or in prison for staffs’ and prisoners’ health and safety. They are also authorized to punish for penalizing infringements. Paroling authorities are the ones to determine the dates and conditions for paroles and invalidate paroles.…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    mandatory detention

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "Unlawful non-citizens" to be detained, regardless of circumstances, until they are granted a visa or leave the country. This policy was introduced in 1992 and has been maintained by successive governments.…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    necessary. For example the police come across two young girls in a park smoking marijuana.…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first aspect of the legal system in which discretion is used is in the powers given to police in the criminal investigative process. The responsibility of enforcing criminal always and ensuring they are adhered to lies with the police in the prevention and detection of crime. The role of discretion is key to whether a crime is even investigates, as well as how an offender may be treated or punished later. Police are able to decide to investigate, make arrests, interrogate suspects, employ powers of search and seizure and grant bail to a suspect, all based on their discretion, in order to uphold justice for the victim of a crime in convicting criminals. These decisions are all examples of how discretion is employed by police and determine how an individual is treated throughout the investigation process in the legal system.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays