Judy Ma'ams Notes for TOK Title #2 Session 2014 May

Maslow’s assertion is that the solutions that we come up with are a reflection of our ways of knowing (tools) instead of the reflection of the problem. What it means is that we try to define our solutions by the tools we have instead of finding our solutions based on our problem. In finding solutions to a problem using our conventional ways of knowing one question that arises is the extent to which instinctively following our pre-existing ways of knowing to define every problem and solution is appropriate. One must question their precision; whether we can reason clearly and consistently, if our perception is deluded, if language conceals or reveals truth, or if profound emotions suggest truth or leads us away from it?
In another area of knowledge, however, emotion can be the exclusive source for obtaining knowledge or reaching a conclusion. Art, for instance is an area of knowledge which is completely driven by one’s emotions and is probably incomplete without it. Examining or scrutinizing a piece of art through pure reason or logic, seems unreasonable since it does not allow for any personal attachments, judgements or associations to the work. Many artists use their art as a means to convey their emotions, and the end result is a painting that reflects their emotions, and creates a similar and sometimes an even more intense emotion in the viewer, like Frida Kahlo’s self portraits1, which show her pain.
Thus by solely analysing a work of art through reasons will obstruct any understanding of the piece’s depth, worth, or significance. Still in many cases, reason obtains more credibility than emotions in the pursuit of knowledge.