Preview

Julius Caesar When He Sees The Crowd

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
633 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar When He Sees The Crowd
In the play, Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Caesar is killed a most brutal death. After his death, Brutus and Markus Antonius give speeches about Caesar. Both compel the crowd in their beliefs, but Brutus held the crowd for a good while and then Antony came in and stole the crowd’s hearts. This is a problem for Brutus, because if he held the crowd’s hearts he would live, if he lost the crowd he died. Antony knew this and he used a very blunt way of speaking to make the crowd turn on Brutus and the other conspirators. When Brutus saw the crowd turning, he and the other conspirators fled the city.

In Brutus’s speech he convinces the crowd by using logos, pathos, and ethos. He convinces the crowd that what he did was the good and honorable thing.
…show more content…

The fact that Antony sent the crowd into a bloodlust means that he was more persuasive. The crowd wanted to burn the conspirators houses, and they killed Cinna the Poet. These actions show how persuasive Antony is. All he did was tell them the truth, but when Antony turned around you could see a smirk on his face, he made the crowd do what he wanted them to.
However persuasive, Brutus had completely convinced the crowd that he did the right thing. The crowd wanted Brutus alive. They also wanted to name him king of Rome.Brutus’s biggest arguments were that he did it for the good of Rome, and that he would rather live free with Caesar dead, than live as a slave with Caesar alive. However, at the end of the story Brutus sees his wrong and understands there is no redemption for him, save hell, with this knowledge and knowing if captured he would paraded through the streets of Rome as a slave and later killed.
In the end Antony’s speech had more of an effect than the speech Brutus gave. The actions of the crowd show’d my point is valid. Brutus’s speech was just convincing enough for him to have time to escape. Antony’s speech sent the crowd into a bloodlust. Going of this any logical person can see that Antony had the most persuasive speech out of the two. I rest my


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    William Shakespeare, a well known writer of plays, created several known plays such as Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet and Julius Caesar. In the tragic play of “Julius Caesar” , Julius Caesar was about to be crowned the King of Rome. However, Caesar’s conspirators, including his best friend Brutus, feared that Caesar would take advantage of his power and turn into a tyrant. Leading the conspirators to plan Caesar’s assassination before he was crowned king. Caesar was stabbed to death twenty-three times in the Roman Senate by the conspirators, including Brutus. Soon after, Caesar’s general and ally, Mark Antony, saw Caesar’s dead body and begged the conspirators to be able to die next to Caesar. Brutus denied his request. Antony shook Brutus’s hand with Caesar’s blood in order to join the conspirators and plan Caesar’s revenge. Both Brutus and Antony gave a speech in front of the plebeians of Rome in order to explain Caesar’s death. Both speeches impacted the audience of plebeians using logos, pathos, and ethos. However, between Brutus and Antony's speech, Antony gave a more effective speech because he proved that Caesar was not ambitious by rejecting the crown three times,had a greater emotional connection with his audience and he convinced the audience of plebeians that Brutus was no longer an honorable man.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Brutus and Antony's funeral speeches from Act 3, Scene 2 of Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar" offers a profound insight into the art of persuasive oratory. Both orators possess distinct styles and objectives, making it a compelling exercise to evaluate which speech is superior in terms of effectiveness. Brutus, driven by his noble intentions and adherence to republican principles, delivers a rational and logical speech. He employs rhetorical devices such as ethos, pathos, and logos to sway the crowd to his perspective.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony not only played with the emotions of his audience like they were children’s toys, but he did so in an ingenious way which helped to keep the conspirators from suspecting him in doing something to go against them. He made the people of Rome sort…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony says some keywords, to make the crowd to believe that he loved him as much as they did. “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me.” Antony also repeats words to indicate to the crowd that he is sarcastic. “For Brutus says he is ambitious, and Brutus is an honourable man.” Antony uses specific words to turn the crowd onto his side.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The citizens of Rome were moved by both Brutus's and Antony's speech at Caesar's funeral. Persuasion can be ingenious in plentiful ways, Brutus and Antony swept the crowd in their own ways. However, by looking at the ethos, pathos, and logos in both Brutus's and Antony's speeches, Antony can be seen as more persuasive.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the greatest english authors, Shakespeare, had developed a play called, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar which contains various writing methods. In Act III, one of the main characters, Caesar was killed by Brutus, his companion Antony had constructed a speech for the Romans about Caesar’s death. By comparing Brutus’ and Antony’s speeches, many rhetorical appeals and devices can be seen. Antony was able to gain the trust of the Romans by using Brutus’ loyalty to Caesar. The main goal of Antony’s speech is to persuade the plebeians that Caesar was not ambitious by using ethos and staying calm and emotional as he delivered his oration.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Brutus's speech, he begins by addressing the crowd as "Romans, countrymen, and lovers,” demonstrating that he is one of them and that he values their role in the Roman community. This helps establish ethos (credibility), and as Brutus continues by arguing that he killed Caesar to protect all citizens from Caesar's ambition…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the trial of brutus

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Our beloved Caesar was shredded from this world by the daggers of hatred and it was Marcus Brutus, who claimed to love the man that led to this tragic murder. Brutus and the conspirators begged that Caesar was killed for the greater good of Rome, and for the benefit of the people, but Caesar was beloved by all. “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” (3.2.23) ; being viewed as a noble man among the Roman people proved to be more important to Brutus than to be a good man to someone who he had called his friend.. They were all simply jealous men who could not stand to continue to be overshadowed by the light of greater men’s triumphs. He would never continue the cruelty shown by Rome’s first ruler whom we so feared and hated; there was no reason for Caesar to die. Caesar had owned all of his accolades and was punished for doing so. He was a strong man, becoming the head of his house at age 16, being ousted from the country by Sulla, being captured by pirates and later crucifying them after his release. “I could be well moved, if I were as you; “If I could pray to move, prayers would move me but I am constant as the Northern Star, Of whose true-fixed and resting quality / There is no fellow in the firmament.” (3,1, 63). Caesar expresses how he would be a stable leader for the Romans. He has gone through the trials of war and exile and emerged a stronger man. Caesar has suffered through his life, and to be betrayed by those he trusted is worse than the pain he suffered in death. Although Brutus stands at trial this day it should be noted that he did not act alone. Numerous members of the senate were involved in this heinous act and should be met with the same fate that should happen Brutus; namely the manipulative Gaius Cassius Longinus. These men were meant to serve the republic and the glory of Rome, yet shamed it by staining the floor of the senate with the blood of Rome’s favored son. Caesar gave numerous political reforms and was beloved by his…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis Oh Rhetorics

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the other hand, Anthony's speech was not as subjective and serious as Brutus presented. Anthony displays a sly tone when he talks about Caesar. When Anthony says, "I came to bury Caesar not praise him" he is creating a realistic tone for the citizens. Anthony was much calmer in his speech than Brutus was when he stated evident facts. Whereas, Brutus wanted to persuade the citizens. Anthony did not portray a lot of emotions in his speech because he mainly focused on facts. However, Anthony did not really say a lot about the killing. Anthony was very fond of Caesar but not enough to grieve heavily for him. There are in fact keen differences between Brutus and Anthony's speeches. Brutus had plenty more emotions than Anthony. Also, Anthony's speech was not to gain sympathy like Brutus' speech was. The reoccurring commas in Anthony's speech helped establish pauses that created his tranquil yet logic diction. One can believe that Anthony had a more unprepared speech than Brutus because he paused after all the comments from the audience. Between both speeches, there was not a single use of Allusion used. It is evident that the main focus was on the diction and punctuation in the…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before his speech begins, the whole crowd is going wild with overwhelming support for Brutus. Knowing this, Antony is quickly able to capture the attention of the people by saying, “For Brutus’ sake, I am beholding to you” (64). By starting off with saying that Brutus endorses whatever Antony is able to say, they are suddenly more curious to hear what he say and what exactly their beloved Brutus approves of. By saying this, Antony is able to borrow Brutus’ honest reputation and use it as his own. Towards the end of his speech, Antony borrows Caesar’s renewed ethos, once again merging voices and giving Antony even more credibility. He asks the audience, “Wherein hath Caesar thus deserved your love?” (234). Antony successfully borrows Caesar’s great reputation and increases his credibility for the people to trust him.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rhetorical appeals

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mark Antony used the three persuasion tools to turn the roman crowd against Brutus. The most convincing use of ethos in Antony’s speech is in the first line of the speech; “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears!” This shows that Mark Antony is trying to get in to the Roman crowd’s hearts. He uses rhetorical irony throughout the speech constantly questioning the ethos of Brutus. “When that the poor cried, Caesar hath wept; ambition should be made of sterner stuff: yet Brutus is an honorable man.” Mark Antony repeats the phrase “yet Brutus is an honorable man” then he says logical statement that proofs Caesar did nothing wrong. Which led the crowd to turn on Brutus, without Antony actually saying that what Brutus did was wrong. Mark Antony uses a lot of facts throughout the course of his speech. One of the key facts in his initial speech is; “When that the poor…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The rhetorical device Antony took hold of throughout his persuasive argument is verbal irony. The use of verbal irony in his speech is so strong that it borders on sarcasm. "Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears/I come to bury Ceasar, not to praise him." (3.2.81-82) says Antony when introducing himself to the crowd. The use of verbal irony is exemplified in this quote with the use of “Friend” He addresses the plebeians as "Friends" with the purpose of persuading them into believing that they were equal, and that he just wanted to say farewell Caesar, even though there is a clear distinction between Antony and the Plebeians. As his speech develops, Antony begins to plant the seed of doubt and anger in the Plebeians’ hearts towards the conspirators. "The noble Brutus/ hath told you Caesar was ambitious,/If it were so, it was a grievous fault, /And grievously hath Caesar answered it,/ Here, under the leave of Brutus and the rest-/ For Brutus is an honorable man,/ So are they all are honorable men" (2.3.84-91) Antony starts off his speech agreeing to not demize the conspirators. However, it is clear to the reader that Antony does everything in his power to show they were not honorable men without saying they were dishonest.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Caesar start

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Antony's funeral speech was much more effective because his use of nnsmsnsnmsmsmdmd ndmkdmd mxdm mxmmd. Mmcmcmmmd mcmmdmc mxmxmmc ckkckxmmd kfdlmmdm mddlmc k. Jdjdn nsnnnd nndndn jdmxm nxnmxn . Bdnxmx mfmcm nmmdPathos, ethos, and logos are three persuasive tools used by Antony and Brutus at Caesar's funeral. Both Brutus and Antony's speeches given, greatly impacted the citizens of Rome . This passage, Julius Caesar, is written by William Shakespeare. This is a play based on a historical event led by the tragedy of the Roman leader ,Caesar, who was killed by his disloyal friends. Within this passage, Brutus and a group of conspirators gathered together upon the action to betrayal Caesar and take over the city Rome. In addition, they all believed that Caesar did not deserve the throne and they had to destroy him. At Caesar’s funeral both Brutus and Antony created heartfelt speeches in order to persuade the flustered citizens of Rome. However, I can conclude that the logos, pathos, and ethos in Antony's speech was much more persuadable than Brutus's unfavorable speech.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning of the play, we meet Brutus, a highly respected, much loved, senator of Rome. He loved Rome as a republic and he has a good life until he is led astray by Cassius. When he becomes embroiled in the assassination of Caesar, he is very reluctant to do so. In the way he acted, you could tell he has sleepless nights over what he should do. He decided to kill Caesar for the good of Rome. This is an important point. One of the reasons why Brutus was noble is that he did not assassinate him for personal gain, but for the greater good, the good of Rome. Unlike the other conspirators, he was not envious, and acted in his best intentions. He had no bad motives. He thought he was right, so he went with his decision instead of being indecisive and cowardly. These reasons show that he was an honourable and noble man. He was popular which shows he was a good man as large numbers of ordinary citizens would not side with a bad man. In the scene when the conspirators plotted the assassination, Brutus said that they should not disrespect Caesar’s body by chopping limbs off but to give him a funeral and to make sure his body was like “a dish fit for the gods.” He also said not to kill Mark Anthony as he was not dangerous and that he wanted Caesars death to be a sacrifice, not a bloodbath. This shows he was a caring person and didn’t fit the persona of “murderer” unlike the other conspirators, who were all keen on killing Mark Anthony and who couldn’t care less about Caesar’s body. Brutus is trusted with Cassius’s secrets about the weaknesses of Caesar in an effort to turn Brutus against Caesar in a pang of…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus and Antony both use different rhetorical techniques to persuade the crowd at Julius Caesar's funeral. However, the arguments can be very different and one speech can be more persuasive than the other. Brutus's and Antony's speech have a different base on the same topic and both have a valid point in each. Brutus lectures about how Caesar is a courageous person. Antony, however, discourses about how Caesar is determined and how Brutus transferred captives home to Rome. Antony also speaks about how Caesar was a faithful man to Rome and to what degree he paid for his fault. Brutus talks about Caesar's honor and if Caesar was dead, then Rome would be complimentary.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays