1 of 4
Case #1
Crawford seeking out help from the public to help fund his excavation is a terrific way to help him meet his needs to succeed his requirements for graduation. Jumpstart is a program online set up to help those in need ask for investors to donate (on their own terms) a sufficient amount to help reach a goal. In this case, twenty four investors helped Crawford reach his goal of $5,000, averaging out about $200 per person, for example. In the times of an investor would request to have some of the artifacts founded in Crawford’s excavations, I think that the best way to respond to the investors is to write a letter giving two reasons as to why he should not and cannot send them their “share”. The first reason is that Crawford could explain in the letter is that it is somewhat of a misunderstanding from the beginning that the investor believed he would be …show more content…
On the good side, I think that it could indeed stop looters from destroying possible educational artifacts and sites. It could also help save the environment in general. If not looters, simply just from other fellow geocachers who could possibly liter and destroy the area by traveling to the site and being present there. I also think that shutting down the locations could be bad too. For instance, Robert joined that forum because he was an archeologist that was interested in seeing more sites that he had surpassed to help himself become more educated. If it is a forum where other archaeologist are also contributing to their findings at these sites then it can be used as an educational and publishing forum. It mentioned that it had mini quizzes that people would have to take to prove that they had indeed visited the area, if looters are involved, they are more interested in the objects they find, not necessarily the historical facts. Therefore, in many cases the looters most likely would not pass