Preview

Juridical Interest Under Maltese Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
824 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Juridical Interest Under Maltese Law
Consider Briefly but Critically the Notion of Juridical Interest
An interest may be defined as “the object of any human desire and the object of such desire must be distinguished from the thing in respect of which the desire is entertained”
The notion of juridical interest links the substantive with the procedure in civil law, where the individual goes on with a civil action because he has a right and interest to institute the case and hopefully obtain a favourable result. Moreover, juridical interest forms part of the “presupposti processuali” that is a requirement to have in existence a valid action and in fact without the juridical interest an action cannot be instituted.
This “presuppost processuali” is so important that for the action to remain valid till the end the juridical interest has to exist in the individual bringing the action or the individual responding to the action till the end. Once interest stops the action becomes defective and “locus standi” no longer subsist.
Various authors have propounded different theories on juridical interest, but what is undisputed is that the scope of having a juridical interest throughout the action is to circumvent those actions which are frivolous and vexatious and therefore protect the courts from unnecessary delays.
Having sufficient interest means that either the “kjamat” or the “intervenjent” is able to show that one of his rights has been violated or that one would like to get damages and the re-instatement of rights after the violation. Showing interest to get a remedy or else a declaration of righteousness is of utmost importance.
Our Maltese code does not contain any provision of law defining juridical interest or setting out the requirements, but the requirements at law can be deduced from some of the articles such as:
960. Any person who shows to the satisfaction of the court that he is interested in any suit already pending between other parties, may, on an application, be admitted in statu

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment, a movant has the burden to demonstrate that no genuine issue of material fact remains to be litigated, that is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and that it appears from the evidence, when viewed most strongly in favor of the nonmoving party, that reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion and that conclusion is adverse to the non-moving party.…

    • 844 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cja Courtsystems

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    | |proceedings on behalf of the people against |prosecution is very much involved in the case with |…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Person trying to keep things closed must come up with an overriding interest likely to be harmed if proceeding was for some reason to remain opened “it would be…

    • 4329 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Con Law 2 Outline

    • 9034 Words
    • 34 Pages

    Substantive Due Process: Principle that laws and regulations must serve the legitimate interests of the…

    • 9034 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bullard Houses: Interests and Buyer (Absentia) Seller (Downtown Co.) BATNAs of Parties  Interests  Interests      Preservation Residential No poor press Room for James Bullard Money  BATNA …

    • 612 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After describing many general advantages of the jury system, Tocqueville lays stress on the status of jury in civil causes. He considers that the judges have a supreme status when dealing civil causes because relevant legal knowledge is extremely needed in those cases. The jury has little influence in the civil causes and it is in those cases that the spirit of law can be express to the public. Hence, the public get closer to the law and constantly increase their knowledge of the law, which contributes to the influence they result in the criminal offences. Thus, the jury, “which is the most energetic means of making the people rule, is also the most efficacious means of teaching it to rule well” (p.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hsc Legal Studies Unit 2

    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages

    AREA OF STUDY 2: CIVIL LAW AND AREA OF STUDY 2: THE CIVIL LAW IN ACTION.…

    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    is one of the sole purposes of the Supreme Court of the United States. Many…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Trial Analysis Paper

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will provide an analysis of a jury trial; my analysis will focus on the right of the defendant. I will articulate how a defendant 's rights at trial can be assured when it comes to The defendant’s right to a speedy trial, the defendant’s right to an impartial judge and the defendant’s right to an impartial jury.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Complexity

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages

    proficiency of all facets of the issues presented to the Court due to the fact that…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dewey John Morals

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The opposition of duty and interest is one way to set up our behaviors for different situations. This opposition, on other words, is the different between principle and interest.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Use of Force

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Bruno, Lisa (2010) Justice 515 Class Syllabus pp 2. Retrieved from http://angel02.gcu.edu/AngelUploads/Content/JUS515 on 11-18-2010.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal precedent recognizes the value of the past. Yet the judiciary is engaged in evaluating legal precedent as applied to contemporary cases. Inevitably, the role of common law in recognizing and altering precedent as applied to contemporary cases results in the creation of new precedents, which in turn will be evaluated in the future. Common law might be bound by general social principles in legal contexts, but it inevitably places the judiciary in the role of evaluating the continued relevance of those principles as new legal contexts emerge through civil…

    • 3787 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    of criminal or civil legal proceedings. The purpose of this position paper is to review the…

    • 4994 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Law Evaluation

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Laws tend to make the lives of every individual safer and pleasant. The subject of this paper focuses on evaluating and identifying the Constitutional safeguards within the 4th, 5th, and 6th amendments of the United States Constitution. How these safeguards to the 4th, 5th, and 6th amendment will apply to juvenile and adult court proceedings. Finally, this paper will focus the impact that these safeguards, such as speedy trial, Miranda warning, exclusionary rule, and right to counsel will have on the day- to- day operation for juvenile and adult courts.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays