Preview

Jurisdiction APA

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
869 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jurisdiction APA
Is there Jurisdiction?

[Insert Name Here]

[Insert Additional details here]

Situation 1:
Mike, a Utah resident, sues Jim, a Nevada resident for $60,000 in Nevada’s Federal District court for negligence (a state law civil suit). Jim argues that the case should be dismissed for a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Is he right?
Under the circumstances, since Mike lives in Utah and Jim lives in Nevada then the type of subject matter jurisdiction that applies is diversity jurisdiction. Under 28 U.S. Code § 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs (http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex-cgi/wexlink?wexns=USC&wexname=28:1332) the sum of the amount Mike is asking for does not exceed 75,000 dollars and so Jim is valid for filing lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Situation 2:
Bill, a California resident, sues Bob, also a California resident, for copyright infringement, a cause of action arising under federal law, in a Federal District Court in California. Bob argues that there is no subject matter jurisdiction. Is he right?
Since there is no diversity in citizenship than diversity jurisdiction is out of the question. There are many forms of copyright infringement now a days thanks to the internet, so it really depends on the particular copyright infringement that Bill is suing Bob for. The federal court has to take into consideration if the victim intentionally committed the act. There is a difference between a person unknowingly using a design found on the worldwide web for financial profit than that compared to somebody who accidentally made a creation of their own imagination for profit. Second, if the defendant directly created the false profile of the business using the business as a target. If the victim intended to harm the possessor or the business that holds the ownership of the copyright in any way or form it is taken into consideration towards the case. Third, if the plaintiff suffered damages because of the act in the state.



References: Legal Information Institute 28 U.S. Code § 1332 Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs; Retrieved from: http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex-cgi/wexlink?wexns=USC&wexname=28:1332 Jurisdiction of Copyright Infringement; Retrieved from: http://faculty.ist.psu.edu/bagby/432Spring12/T15/jurisdiction.html Personal Jurisdiction in Federal Courts; Retrieved from: .http://civilprocedure.uslegal.com/jurisdiction/personal-jurisdiction/personal-jurisdiction-in-federal-courts/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In this case “Anthony Walden vs. Gina Fiore” they are trying to figure out if the state of Nevada has the right to exercise personal jurisdiction over the case. On August 8, 2006 TSA at San Juan airport searched Gina Fiore and Keith Gipson and their bags where they found about 97,000 dollars cash, Fiore told them that they were just extreme gamblers that had just finished gambling at a local spot El San Juan. Also, she stated that she was a resident of California and Nevada and she planned to catch the flight to Atlanta then take a connected flight to Nevada. Even with that large sum of money they were cleaned and boarded the flight and departed to Atlanta. A law enforcement officer from the San Juan airport contacted the petitioner task force…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One trucking company owner, Tanya Trucker owns a company that is located in the state of Denial. Ms. Trucker is not happy with the additional expenses that this statute will cost her business. Her intentions are to file suit against the state of Confusion to have this statute overturned. However, before this can happens Ms. Trucker must establish which state would have jurisdiction to rule on the case. In this case both parties reside in different states. Diversity of citizenship occurs if a case between (1) citizens of different states, (2) a citizen of a state and a citizen or subject of a foreign country, or (3) a citizen of a state and a foreign country, where the foreign country is the plaintiff. (Cheeseman 2010)…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Johnson, who resides in New York, is owed $100,000 by Maxwell, who resides in California. Johnson is permitted to bring this case to federal court.…

    • 2589 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    PA110 Complaint Form 1

    • 707 Words
    • 4 Pages

    3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of the State of Missouri and the defendant is a citizen of the State of Illinois and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs.…

    • 707 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This venue is a determination of the most appropriate location for litigating a dispute. “While jurisdiction requires an analysis of whether a court has authority over a particular case, venue is the legal concept that defines the most appropriate location for the trial. Two or more courts will sometimes have jurisdiction over the very same matter, but it would be more appropriate from a fairness perspective to hear the case in a particular location” (Melvin, 2012, p.59). If Tanya Trucker desires to file a lawsuit against the State of Confusion to overturn the statute they have enforced she must understand which jurisdiction to file in. Initially, Tanya Trucker must decide in which court to file the lawsuit. The court selected must have jurisdiction over the case of this type of dispute. The venue where Tanya Trucker should file her suit is with the court of…

    • 1577 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. ISSUE: The issue is “Did Court of Appeal of Louisiana approve lack of personal jurisdiction of an internet merchandiser?”…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PA205

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Illinois and the defendant is a citizen of Missouri and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUS 311 wk 1 disc 1

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page

    Based on the information provided in the first hypothetical case problem in our text, if Javier decided to sue Energy-Auto Inc., Javier would be the plaintiff (the entity that is suing) and Energy-Auto Inc. would be the defendant (the entity that is being sued). Javier could sue in New York as our text states “… the action should be brought in the state with closer ties to the litigants or the subject matter of the action” (Rogers, 2012, sec. 1.2). He could also sue in Oklahoma, as that is where Havier was injured, so long as he provides due process (service of process). His injury in Oklahoma meets the minimum contact requirement for personal jurisdiction. “Minimum contacts may consist of doing business in the forum state, causing an injury there, or owning real estate there” (Rogers, 2012, sec. 1.2).…

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy/201 Quiz

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    | | |(6). |If a case may be brought in either federal court or in state court, jurisdiction is said to be:…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    B. (2010). Immigration and Nationality Law Cases and Materials (4th ed.). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Funny Face Case Study

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Generally, this power only covers a specific geographic region. For example in the state court system, a court's in personam jurisdiction usually extends to the state's borders, whereas a federal court exerts power over a greater area (Kubasek, Browne, Giampetro-Meyer, Barkacs, Herron, Williamson, & Dhooge, 2011). Because this case involves multiple parties from multiple geographic areas, the statutes regarding in personam jurisdiction must be scrutinized for all three states involved (New York, California, and Florida) before a venue may be decided upon.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Con Law Outline

    • 5129 Words
    • 28 Pages

    Art III § 2 spells out the Federal Court’s subject matter jurisdiction. The claim must be within this section to be in Federal Jurisidction.…

    • 5129 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Homework Assignment 5

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Jurisdiction is the authority of a court to hear and decide cases. There are several types; a few are Appellate Jurisdiction, General Jurisdiction, Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Personal Jurisdiction. Appellate is a court that hears a case an appeal from a lower court. General is a court that hears various kinds of cases in general. Subject Matter is a court that can hear only certain kinds of cases listed in the federal statutes and constitution. Personal is a court that makes decisions binding on the person involved in a civil case.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rudzewicz Vs Burger King

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Burger King, the Supreme Court held that Florida had specific jurisdiction over Rudzewicz’s because he had purposefully availed himself to Florida by ‘purposefully directing his efforts towards the state’. See Id. at 476. Id. at 487. Rudzewicz and a partner, both residents of Michigan, had purchased a Burger King franchise through Burger King Corp’s Michigan office. Id. at 466. Rudzewicz was unable to keep up with the monthly payments and Burger King Corp brought suit in their home state of Florida. Id. at 468. Rudzewicz and his partner argued, “that because they were Michigan residents and because Burger King's claim did not "arise" within the Southern District of Florida, the District Court lacked personal jurisdiction over them.”…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout history, we have witnessed the territorial conception of national and international intellectual property law face an array of global challenges. According to the principle of territoriality, the possibility of protecting an IP right is limited to the territory of the country where the right is granted. In other words, it is fundamentally domestic. As general rule this would signify that a country’s IP laws would not receive application outside of their borders. In the case Aramco, the Supreme Court as a matter of statutory contraction, states that U.S. courts are to presume “that legislation of Congress, unless a contrary intent appears, is meant to apply only within the territorial boundaries of the United States.” The party who makes a claim with respects to extraterritorial application bears the burden of showing the “affirmative intention of Congress clearly expressed”. By establishing this presumption against extraterritoriality the Supreme Court echoes the importance concerning the principle of territoriality. Thus, U.S Congress has authority to assert extraterritoriality of its laws only under exceptional circumstances.…

    • 2490 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays