This paper demonstrates Hodges University’s learning outcome of critical thinking.
Jason George – First Wheel
Hodges University
MNA-4100 Economics for Managers
Professor Ron Harbour
Due: March 27, 2013
Submitted: March 27, 2013
Graded by BSM Instructor: __________________________
Grade Awarded: __________________________________
Table of Contents
Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….3
Situational Analysis…………………………………………………………………………….....3
Problem Identification…………………………………………………………………………….5
Possible Recommendations for Future Action……………………………………………………8
Best Choice of Action……………………………………………………………………………..9
Characters………………………………………………………………………………………..10
Student Use of Critical Thinking Learning Outcome……………………………………………10
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………….11
Certification Statement…………………………………………………………………………..13
References………………………………………………………………………………………..14
Introduction Leadership is important. However, without developing an understanding of followers, and how to help them be most effective, an organization cannot survive. Critical thinking is defined as “thinking independently and being mindful of the effect of one’s behavior on achieving goals” (Daft, 2010, p. 424). This literary analysis will demonstrate, and examine, two profoundly different types of leadership. The hierarchy of needs and the two sources from which power are derived will also be discussed and demonstrated as to how these concepts apply to A Jury of Her Peers. Critical thinking principles will be utilized in the analysis of A Jury of Her Peers, as well as comparisons of society’s mentality of the story’s time period to that of present times. Through critical thinking, this analysis will determine which genders’ methods of investigation provided a more balanced and conclusive approach. Written in 1917, three years before the passage of the 19th