Preview

Just War In The Old Testament

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
805 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Just War In The Old Testament
Historically three world religions with their roots in the Middle East adopted, at different times, the idea of a 'Holy War', as well as that of a 'Just War'. Brief outlines are discussed below.

Judaism: It is found in the Old Testament as; ‘they shall beat their swords into ploughshares and their spears into pruning hooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more’. (The Old Testament: Isaiah 2:4). In principle, peace is the central teaching of rabbinical Judaism (teachings based on the writings of early Jewish scholars). Yet, Judaism is not a pacifist religion. Although the idea of Holy War is recorded in the Hebrew Bible, but it was not about making others Jewish, rather it is about their survival.
…show more content…
So while revenge and unprovoked aggression are condemned, self defence is justified. Jews have been victims of dreadful persecution, at the beginning of Islamism and later at the hands of Christians for nearly two thousand years, culminating in the Holocaust during the Second World War. On the other hand, defending modern Israel and dealing justly with the Palestinians places Jews people in difficult dilemmas; violence and aggression and peace.

Christianity: During the 2,000 years history of Christianity, all three positions on war (Pacifism, Just War and Crusade or Holy War) have had their position. Jesus’ teachings in the Sermon on the Mount (The New Testament: Matthew 5 - 7) are very clearly non-violent. For example, ‘blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God’ (Matthew 5:9) and ‘love your enemies’ (Matthew 5:44).

Pacifism was the teaching and practice of the Christian Church until the Roman Emperor Constantine (274-337) made Christianity the official religion of the Empire. Pacifism then largely took turn toward the development of the 'Just War' doctrine. Thus politics and religion came together to endorse the idea of
…show more content…
Pacifism is a minority position held by some Christians in the larger denominations (Roman Catholic, Church of England, Methodist, etc.). The Quakers, Mennonites, Amish and Hutterites together make up the historical 'peace churches', with a long tradition of pacifist belief and action. But the question remains: which position on war is the most faithful to the teaching of Jesus, who advised his followers to ‘turn the other cheek’ and who, when arrested, forbade a disciple to use a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Most wars are fought for territory, money, or political and religious freedom and, as a result, many wars involve Christianity and religion…

    • 650 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao Tzu's "Thoughts from the Tao-Te-Ching" took a more pacifistic approach. He believes that no man had the right to defeat enemies by using violence and…

    • 743 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ap dbq 1

    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Doc. 1, selection from the Confucian Analects: It is saying that at times war is, necessary. The common people should be prepared, prior war. “James Legge, a missionary, a sinologist, a professor. The master said, “To lead an uninstructed people to war is to throw them away.” His point of view was that you must teach the men before you left them go off to war.” (doc. 1) Doc. 2, statements made by Gurus in the Sikh faith: The first Guru pledges love and peace for all humankind. A Guru, later, explained that there are some justifications for war when diplomacy fails. “J. Ferguson, a poet, a believer of peace until no other option is left. He thinks that when all the effort to make/ restore peace fails, and seems to be useless, it is right to fight.” (doc. 2) Doc.4, scriptures from the New Testament: The scriptures taken from Jesus’ teachings explain to followers to love their enemies. “This was found in the New Testament in the Bible, it says love your enemies [Mathew 5:44].” (doc.4) These are grouped together due to the fact that in both documents its says that only when all else fails is war necessary. War should not be the…

    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social norms are acceptable until they start destroying the psychological states of individuals. When the sexualities of individuals are repressed, symptoms of psychological deterioration occur due to restrictive social norms. These are the circumstances in “The Hands” by Sherwood Anderson and “The Storm” by Kate Chopin. In “The Hands,” Wing Biddlebaum once known as a teacher named Adolph Myers at a boy’s school is chased to a new town in Ohio where he is repressed and fearful of society because he is a homosexual during a time when only heterosexuality is accepted. In “The Storm,” a woman named Calixta is in a restrictive position as a housewife. When she is alone, her past lover, Alcee, coincidentally comes by the house and they have an affair which ultimately relieves her depression. Both protagonists are put in restrictive positions…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand Absolute pacifism completely rejects the idea of war and that it is never right to take part in war, even in self defence. The value of human life…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, pacifism during a war lowers morale. How can one expect to win a war if we do not fight back and try to end it? The only way people can have faith and confidence in defeating the enemy is if they know we will do what it takes to defeat it. George Orwell addresses how ignorant it is to be pacifism during a war that causes many…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pacifist: a person who opposes the use of war or violence to settle a dispute.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    War and warfare can serve different purposes. Both the Roman Empire during the Golden Age, under the auspices of Rome’s first emperor, Caesar Augustus and the Israel’s who followed the Hebrew Bible engaged warfare. However, the wars had a different focuses and different goals. The wars of the Old Testament were wars of extermination, while the Romans had limited wars. Wars of extermination occurred during Israel’s theocracy, and are often cited by non-believers as a reason to reject following a religion. However, the wars of extermination were specific to the period when Israel was a theocracy. Israel, we learn from the Hebrew Bible, followed a unique form of government in which God himself…

    • 1809 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Catholic Social Teaching

    • 479 Words
    • 3 Pages

    7. Many Catholics contend that a total commitment to _nonviolence_ is better suited to the gospel witness to peace.…

    • 479 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rudimentary statement of modern Christians is that was it rarely justified and should be avoided, with the exception of the Just War conditions being met (Just War: introduction, 2014). Although Christianity generally and strongly promotes peace it also believes that there will be times where war might be the only road to peace. Although this can be the only way at times it is deviating from Jesus’s beliefs and no longer adhering to the Christianity beliefs. The understanding of Christianity in today’s era is far from what it used to be and it doesn’t preach about peace as strongly as it used…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    (Isa. 2:4, ESV), Then after 312 CE the pacifist’s views changed because of the end of Roman persecution of Christians. They didn’t like it when criminals would sin, or someone threatened Western civilization. They see it at times to excuse going to war in some situations. It is also noticed that pacifism is halted at this time in history as well in the Christian people. It is also recorded that the logical convictions with-in a pacifist is that they actually believe it is always wrong to go…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    me myself and I

    • 1314 Words
    • 14 Pages

    presupposition of our faith, and the manner of our action. Nonviolence as it grows from Judaic-Christian…

    • 1314 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Living by this moral principle can cause a greater harm by turning the other cheek than by using force to deminish a greater threat. There is always going to be people seeking out power or people who have different beliefs and morals because it is engraved within ourselves through generation after generation. Jan Narveson directly states a pacifists view, "His belief is not only that violence is evil but also that it is morally wrong to use force to resist, punish, or prevent violence. We are aggressive and greedy people and to change the thinking of the entire world with out the threat of force seems nearly impossible. Hypathetically, if pacifism was put into law, the use of any type of force will be breaking the law and the sentence is life in prison. Now imagine if a man breaks into a house of a young lady and rapes this lady and then pulls a gun out to shoot her. If the woman grabs the gun and shoots the man, she would also be sent to prison for life because any use of force is labelled as unacceptable. In our society today, violence is happening everyday even though we have laws in place to minimize them. Violence is not only a thing of the past but it is a thing of the future and without a proper punishment, violence will increase drastically. Narveson communicates a second version of pacifism where " one might argue that pacifism is desirable as a tactic: that as a matter of fact, some good end, such as the reduction of violence itself , is to be achieved by 'turning the other cheek'. " This again is a good theory, but if it was put into action, the consequences would be great. A human has the right to defend themselves, or help a person that is in need. In war it is the same thing but instead of one person needing help, it is a population worth of needed help. A person claiming they are a pure hearted pacifist by " turning the other cheek" does not necessarily make it the best…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell wrote the famous novel Animal Farm. The novel is about a group of animals revolting against humans, towards the middle of the book pigs take over. There are two leaders in the novel, Napoleon and Snowball whom are pigs. They establish seven condiments that they would go by, to keep each other civilized. The Nobel Prize winner, William Golding wrote Lord of the Flies. The famous novel is about a group of boys stranded on an island, striving to build civilization. The characters in the appoint Ralph as the commander, along with Jack who is the leader of the hunters, together they try keeping the group of boys civil. As you can see there’s a system that's developed throughout the novels to keep the character from falling into savagery.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dividend Policy

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    * Money provided by the State/ Central Government in pursuance of the guarantee given by the Government.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays