Justice Antonin Scalia Case Analysis

With the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the next Justice will probably dictate if the Supreme Court will emerge as a friendly domain for unions and workers. The previous three years have been disorderly at the Supreme Court level for union lawyers and union officials. Today’s unions need a Justice on their side who will hear their voice in matters concerning the working people. Time and time again unions and their attorneys have prepared for the unfavorable as the Court has decided to hear cases that pose a threat to unions. Now, that Antonin Scalia has passed away in February 2016, his replacement may decide if the Courts will stay on its current path, or if it will once again convert into a helpful atmosphere for unions and workers. The best hope for a victory for the unions had rested with Justice Antonin Scalia, who has written and said things sympathetic to their position. In the 1977 decision, Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, the Supreme Court made a distinction between two kinds of compelling payments. Forcing nonmembers to pay for a union’s political activities violated the First Amendment, stated by the court. But it was constitutional, the court added, to
By all accounts, back at the beginning of the year it looked like the justices would deal unions a major setback by freeing millions of government workers. Unfortunately, Justice Scalia died. It was the starkest illustration yet of how the sudden death of Justice Antonin Scalia has blocked the power of the court’s four remaining conservatives to move the law to the right. When the case was argued earlier in the year, the court’s conservative majority seemed ready to say that forcing public workers to support unions they had declined to join violates the First