Preview

Justice In Black Mirror's White Bear

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1899 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Justice In Black Mirror's White Bear
Black Mirror’s second season, episode two titled White Bear, opens with the woman unable to recall her identity. She only knows her name, Victoria Skillane, and all the while, she is surrounded by pictures of a young girl and a man, who she assumes to be her daughter. As she steps out of her house, Victoria notices that every individual she sees records her, not replying to her questions. Soon after the recording begins, figures in masks follow and attempt to kill her.

The episode climaxes when Victoria manages to hold a gun and shoot it at her perpetrators, but confetti pops out. The wall opens, revealing an audience; Victoria was placed in simulation without her knowledge. It is revealed that she and her fiance kidnapped a young girl, Jemimah. Her fiance tortured and killed Jemimah- while Victoria recorded with her smartphone. After being caught, Victoria pleaded guilty- the court decided to
…show more content…
To compel others to be virtuous-impossible in Kant’s perspective as “morals constitute as free will; yet, law can be utilized to shape the ethics of an individual and punish those who refuse to abide by these laws” (George, Smith). In executing consequences for breaking the law, Kant states consequently, if a certain use of freedom is itself a hindrance to freedom according to universal laws (that is, is unjust), then the use of coercion to counteract it, inasmuch as it is the preservation of a hindrance to freedom, is consistent with freedom according to universal laws (Kant, Immanuel, and John Ladd 35). This can be interpreted as issuing an equal amount of justice compared to the sentence of the crime, as he implies that rights must be respected and to prevent the injustices- the consequences ought to be consistent[with the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    She is held by the FBI and questioned.Flashback of her FBI training at Quantico with the other recruits is shown. One of them, Ryan Booth, is really an undercover agent who is instructed by Special Agent O'Connor to surveil Alex. Alex had told O'Connor how she shot her father, Jeff Michaels, during a fight with her mother. He turns out to be an FBI agent himself. Back in the present, they find Ryan unconscious, shot with Alex's gun in her apartment, together with evidence that points to her involvement in the attack. Alex is arrested. Miranda Shaw, her mentor from Quantico, helps her…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Melinda, in the end, tells someone and I would think she got justice, but that night scared her for life, she wasn't able to function for so long since she was trapping her emotions inside…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates: What makes a deed or action worth punishment by the law? By what level of severity must the action be for the law to feel the need to step in and control the person whom is committing the deed?…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Punishment, a necessary evil, is sometimes required to deter law violators from repeating their crime and to serve as an example to others who would also violate the law.” (Schmalleger. 2011. P.81)…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Kant’s argument he argues that any action taken against another person to which the person could not consent violates the perfect duty explained in the second formulation. If a thief were to steal a book from a stranger, it may have been that the stranger would have consented to it, if he was asked by the thief. However, no one can consent to theft, because consenting would mean the transfer of items was not a theft, because the victim couldn’t have consented to the action, it could not be categorize as a universal law of nature, and theft opposes perfect duty. c. Gensler appeals to arguments like this:!!!…

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sioux Tribe Research Paper

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He follows this up by explaining that “If it is of such nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then I say, break the law.” This also clarifies that when the nature of the law is unjust, then following good conscience resulting in the breaking of the law is actually the duty of the people. According to Thoreau, for a law “to be strictly just, it must have the sanction and consent of the governed.” Strangely enough, Thoreau believes that a citizen’s duty is not to force others to eradicate the wrong by breaking the law, but only eradicate the wrong in one’s own life. Thoreau shows how remove injustice from one’s life in an influential line that reads as…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Immanuel Kant, guilt is considered a necessary condition for punishment and judicial punishment can never be used merely as a means to promote some other good for the criminal himself or civil society. He argues that, an offender must first be found to be deserving of punishment before any consideration is given to the utility of punishment for himself or his fellow citizens. In this view, utilitarian concerns can never justify the punishment of an innocent person while guilt itself demands punishment even where punishment is entirely devoid of social utility. Therefore, again we observe that the best action is the one that maximizes utility and can be applied in various ways, but most commonly relates to the maintenance of healthy emotional…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    However, others believe that people only follow the rules of the law because they do not want to get into trouble and face up to any punishments. They believe without the law ethics and morals would not exist. This means that, for example, murder or rape would be socially accepted because there is no one to say it is wrong. Therefore the only reason people don’t do these unacceptable things is so they do not have to take any consequences such as going to court or prison.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Immanuel Kant was an enlightenment philosopher in utilitarian liberalism. He had many theories what justice is and what this means and theories on how this affected punishment. He used the devolvement of enlightenment to search for the measure of justice, whereby humans are seen as rational and capable of analysis and decision making. (Hudson, 2003:5) Previously issues for justice for liberal democracies had been about the distribution of material and social goods. (Hudson, 2003:6) However, for Kant his theory of justice revolved around the idea of individual freedom and equal freedom for all. He believes as we are all rational and capable of making are own decisions that we can all abide by the moral law. Kant’s moral philosophy is based on what he calls the categorical imperative, where he says ‘Always…

    • 2724 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all crime is a moral wrong that confers upon society a duty to punish and to set up institutions to facilitate punishment. The punishment, which must match the crime, is an ipso facto (by its very nature) moral good.…

    • 388 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his book Metaphysics of Morals, Kant expresses that neither state, nor society can exist without laws. Kant’s view on crime and punishment is as follows:…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant's Moral Equation

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Immanuel Kant's moral theory can be best explained by comparing it to a math equation. Kant's moral system will always hold true no matter what the circumstance just like how two plus two will always equal four. According to Kant, our lives should be lived according to maxims that can be willed into universal law (Kant, Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals, p 303). However the action regarding a moral decision is not judged by the consequences of that action, rather by the motive of that action.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant created a new perspective in philosophy which had widespread influences on contemporary philosophy work. Through all his achievements in philology, his moral Philosophy will be discussed in this paper. According to Kant’s theory, moral laws relate to fairness and consistency. Both of these concepts lead to the principle of universalizability. He stated that, “An act is morally acceptable if and only if its maxim is universalizable.” To prove his statement he used two imperatives which are hypothetical imperatives and Categorical Imperatives. “Categorical Imperatives” is a single moral obligation that relates to the concept of duty which Kant defines as a major content in this obligation. Kant assessed the principle of universalizability by denying benevolence which he also used in his other theory “the principle of humanity.” Both of his principles proved the relationship between morality and rationality. Kant did show his opposition to utilitarianism and handled the shortcomings of consequentialism. On the other hand, the Kantian perspective has its own problems that are neatly addressed by consequentialism. The Kantian perspective did draw strong claims compared to utilitarianism in some concepts; however, Kant’s theory did have its problems generally.…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes’s definition of punishment clearly asserts that a punishable offense must constitute a “transgression of the law.” This short, seemingly banal, provision forms the central tenet of Hobbes’s punishment theory—a tenet from which various subsidiary conclusions can be drawn. Contrary to notions of sovereign omnipotence, a careful analysis of Hobbes’s conception of law as it pertains to punishment reveals limitations to sovereign authority in the form of a ‘positive legal order’ (Cattaneo 1965; Hüning 2007).…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant Morality

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unlike Utilitarianism, which considers an actions morality to be dependent upon the utility resulting from the action. Kant’s moral theory holds that an actions ethicality is derived not from consequence, but the action itself. He distinguishes between actions that are morally virtuous, and actions that are not virtuous, by applying the action universally to mankind. If the action is necessary for a functioning society, then a person is morally obligated to fulfill the action unconditionally, this is what Kant refers to as the categorical imperative. To elaborate, under Kant’s moral theory, if one desires to be virtuous, they must always tell the truth. Though this may seem intuitive,being…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics