Preview

Juvenile Crime Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1095 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Juvenile Crime Paper
Juvenile Crime Paper
Malina Wiese
CJS/200
December 9,2012

Juvenile Crime Paper
Juvenile Court is a tribunal having special authority to try and pass judgments for crimes committed by children or adolescents who have not attained the age of maturity, generally defined as persons under the age of 18 and above the age of 10. Adult Court is a court of law where adults can be tried, and if convicted, face adult punishment such as probation, adult prison, or even the death penalty.
Juvenile cases are handled differently than adult criminal cases. Instead of a criminal district or county court, juvenile cases are heard by a juvenile court judge. A juvenile who is alleged to have committed an offense may have their case heard in juvenile court. This is a type of civil court and has different rules than adult court. Juvenile court provides defendants with fewer rights than they would receive in an adult court. In many states, juveniles do not have the right to a jury trial, but do have the right to counsel and also an appeal.
The proceedings are civil as opposed to criminal. So, instead of being formally charged with a crime, juvenile offenders are accused of committing a delinquent act. Even though juvenile court is more civil in nature, a juvenile court judge does have some criminal type “authority”. A juvenile case gets started when a prosecutor or probation officer files a civil petition, charging the juvenile with violating a criminal statute and asking that the court determine that the juvenile is delinquent. If the charges are proven a delinquency, a determination is made, and the juvenile comes under the courts broad power. At that point, the juvenile court has the authority to do what it considers to be in the best interest of the juvenile.
The goal of most juvenile court programs is to rehabilitate a child before they become an adult and get into more trouble. Most states will treat juvenile matters as civil matters or family law matters, rather than

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The United States government is based on a checks and balances type system. The three main parts of this system are the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. This judicial system’s job is to uphold the law of the land. Law can be defined as a set of rules or norms of conduct which mandate, proscribe or permit specified relationships among people and organizations, provide methods for ensuring the impartial treatment of such people, and provide punishments for those who do not follow the established rules of conduct (Wikipedia.org, 2005). This is a very wide and all encompassing definition of the law and the governing judicial system. Just like the United States government the judicial system is broken up into different checks, balances, and systems. Two of these main systems are the juvenile justices system and the adult justice system. The obvious difference between these two courts is that the juvenile system is designed to handle youth offenders and the adult system is designed to handle adult offenders. Both of these two systems despite their difference have the same end goal; to administer justice. In the pages to follow we will discuss the big picture of the juvenile justice system, go over a point by point comparison between the juvenile system and the adult system, touch on both the benefits and disadvantages to being tried as a minor in the juvenile court from the perspective of a minor, and review the societal implication of abolishing the juvenile court system.…

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Juvenile Justice System is part of the criminal law system that focuses on those individuals who are between the ages of 9 and 18. This system was set up for those persons who did criminal acts, but who are not yet considered adults. In most states the age for criminal culpability is 18. While the age of being treated as a juvenile in the court system is up to the age of 18, this can depend on the crime. Juveniles can be transferred to the adult court system if the juvenile court waves or relinquishes its jurisdiction. Juvenile law is mainly governed by state laws…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The responsibility and purpose of the juvenile court is to rehabilitate a juvenile, not to punish them (www.law.cornell.edu).…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some similarities are that both courts issues sanctions, courts plea bargaining is often an option, the defendant has a due process rights in addition to unreasonable searches and seizures rights. Juvenile and adult offender receive Miranda rights at time of arrest.(Bartollas, Miller. 2008). Both courts use proof beyond a reasonable doubt as a standard for guilt or innocence. Boot camps is an option for both juveniles and adult offenders. Juvenile and adult courts have their crimes classified as either misdemeanors, felonies or infractions. Some of the differences between the juvenile and adult court system is that at the juvenile level parents have a very active role. The juvenile system refers to juvenile as delinquents, truants, orphans,…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juvenile justice is the area of criminal law applicable to persons not old enough to be held responsible for criminal acts. Juveniles should be convicted as adults for their violent crimes no matter what age they are because they knew exactly what they were thinking and doing at the time the crime was committed.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The juvenile justice sector applies to individual under the age of 18 that are unable to be tried in the adult court system. Juvenile accused of committing crimes could face a transfer to the adult court system in conformance with some state laws and the specific crime that was committed. Juveniles later found guilty are not convicted of committing crimes, but rather delinquencies. Enforced by the state, in most cases, juvenile justice focuses on lower the recidivism rate by rehabilitating offenders. Rehabilitation, rather than imposing punishment on juveniles eliminates the hardening of the juveniles. Confined juveniles often learn the ways of more violent juveniles that they would not learn if they were sentenced to rehabilitation instead. With newly acquired skills from other jailhouse inmates, juveniles are more likely to go on to commit more serious crimes. As for adults, the technique is often punishment and then rehabilitation due to the fact that society views children as more likely to change rather than adult…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles process is as listed; detention hearing then fact finding hearing, after that they have the petition and respondent and next they have the adjudication and finally the involved/ delinquent. The juveniles usually and generally will not get a jury. Their court hearings are closed off to the public for the convenience of their privacy and mainly due to their age. Bails are generally not allowed nor set for juveniles/minors. For minors to get out of jail before their entire process is over they must prove to the judge that they are not a flight risk and that they are not a danger or threat to society and their community. When juveniles commit smaller mes a lot of the time they are punished worse than an adult would be for the exact same crime/offense. When a juvenile is punished by probation they are usually put on probation for a longer period than an adult would be. The stipulations to their probation would be a longer list as well. For example they would have to follow a curfew and they would have to respect their parents, and keep their grades up, attend one or more extra curricular activity, and they would have to possibly attend counseling. If they were to break these stipulations than they would have to report to their judge once again and possibly have their probation sentence lengthened or they would get what they call a probation violation and have to just serve their length of a sentence. For many of the…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When reviewing the mechanisms that are utilized to transfer juveniles from the juvenile court to criminal court, I would look at what means would best serve the juvenile. The three most commonly used mechanisms are the juvenile wavier, prosecutorial wavier, and legislative wavier (Elrod & Ryder, 2014). Based upon my research, I would favor the judicial wavier. The results of a juvenile being transferred into adult court can have some negative consequences on a juvenile. A juvenile court usually focuses on rehabilitation of the accused juvenile; however, the adult court will focus more on punishment ("Juvenile").…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juvenile Court Workgroup

    • 635 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Neubauer and Fradella (2014) we know the Judges are the highest authority in any court. Generally the judges of the juvenile court just like judges in any other court are the highest authority. They take care of solving all the matters that are left opened in the case by the prosecution and or the defense attorney. Moreover, judges in the juvenile court sometimes might have the aid of hearing officers, typically attorneys who are selected by the court to hear juvenile cases. After hearing this cases they make recommendations to the judge about the case (Fradella and Neubauer, 2014). This individuals are placed there by the court with…

    • 635 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If juvenile are tried one as an adult and then juveniles will be tried as an adult in all cases. In a few cases, such as a murder or rape, the assumption is that a juvenile should be tried as an adult unless the trial court rules that the case should be sent to juvenile court. Some states have laws that require a youth’s case to be tried in adult court these laws usually based this automatic transfer on the youth’s age, the seriousness or type of crime, and the juvenile’s prior record.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile courts and adult courts are both similar and different in many ways. They’re mainly similar in putting away offenders or giving a punishment. Juvenile courts and adult courts are different in the way that juveniles are not put on trial for committing crimes, but for delinquent actions, and when the delinquent actions are very severe, then they could be considered crimes and the juvenile could be tried as an adult in the adult court system. Also juveniles don’t have the same right to a public trial in front of a jury that adults do. Juvenile courts seem to be more lenient towards their offenders because in their case they are trying to rehabilitate and reform delinquents and then release them into public society. Whereas the purpose of adult court is simply to punish…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arizona Death Penalty

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Juveniles are treated different than adults for obvious reasons. One of the more popular ones include, that juvenile brains aren’t fully developed so teens don’t fully understand what they are doing. Another thing that is different about adults and juveniles is who usually decides the cases. In adult cases, their fate lies…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) Closed court proceedings. Cases involving juveniles are held in a closed court room, and a judge decides the sentence for the offender. This is called a bench trial. Also, juvenile cases are more informal, the offender waits his/her turn to speak before the judge. Adult cases are open to the public and press and details of the case can be provided to the media. Most cases in the adult system are jury trials, occasionally a defendant will waive that right and request a bench trial.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    About 100 years ago juvenile justice system was established in the United States to divert youthful offenders from the destructive punishment of criminal courts, encouraging rehabilitation. Under most state laws, juvenile offenders do not commit "crimes." They commit delinquent acts, some of which are acts that would constitute crimes if committed by an adult. The trial phase of a juvenile case is an adjudication hearing. This means that the judge hears the evidence and determines whether the child is delinquent. The court may then take whatever action it deems to be in the child 's best interest. The purpose is to rehabilitate, not punish (Citigate). Besides revalidation, financial cost is another reason for juveniles to be tried less harsh. It costs much more to detain a juvenile than an adult. The average cost of holding a teenager in a juvenile facility was $33,000 in 1990, the last year data was available. The average cost of holding an adult prisoner was about $23,000 in 1992, the most recent year for which data is available (Levitt).…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A human being under the age of eighteen gets in trouble with the law; the case will be heard in the juvenile justice system. That was not the case. The idea of a separate justice system for juveniles is just over one hundred years old. Juvenile delinquents are minors, usually defined as being between the age of ten and eighteen, who have committed some act that violates the law. However, these acts aren’t called “crimes” as they would be for adults. Rather, crimes committed by minors are called “Delinquent”. A minor is someone who cannot be controlled by parental authority and commits antisocial or criminal acts, as vandalism or violence.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays