Preview

Kant's 3 Categories Of Justice

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
951 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kant's 3 Categories Of Justice
The first formulation of Kant’s categorical imperative states that one should only act on reasons we would be willing to have anyone in a similar situation act on. This formulation requires universalizability and reversibility. On the other hand, the second formulation states that one should never use people only as a means to your ends. We must always treat others as they freely and rationally consent to be treated. Under this formulation it is also stated that we must help others pursue their freely and rationally chosen ends. I would say that the two formulations are quite similar since they both talk about treating others the right way. The first formulation tells us that we shouldn’t do something that we wouldn’t like to be done to us. …show more content…
What are the three categories of justice? How are they distinguished?
The three categories of justice are distributive justice, retributive justice, and compensatory justice. The distributive justice requires the just distribution of benefits and burdens. The retributive justice requires the just imposition of punishments and penalties. In other words, it refers to the justice of blaming or punishing persons for doing wrong. The compensatory justice requires just compensation for wrongs or injuries. It refers to the justice of restoring to a person what the person lost when someone wronged them.
9. What are the differences between Capitalist, Socialist, Fairness, and Libertarian notions of justice? What are the strongest and weakest parts of each
…show more content…
The first one states that we exist in a web of relationships and should preserve and nurture those concrete and valuable relationships we have with specific persons. The second on states that we should exercise special care for those with whom we are concretely related by attending to their particular needs, values, desires, and concrete well-being as seen from their own personal perspective. I personally think that Malden Mills company did a good thing when the owner rebuilt and paid his workers when they were not working. The owner maintained that he had a responsibility to his workers and to his community. I think that what he did was good because he helped his workers when they needed him the most. His actions exemplify the principles of the ethics of care because he exercised special care for his workers by attending to their needs and by preserving the valuable relationship he had with his workers. He attended their needs by giving them paying them even when they weren’t working because he understood that these people needed the money to survive. He also preserved a good relationship with them by demonstrating that he cared about them and was there for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A person who is a good leader is like someone who would do anything for their people. he knows what his goal is but it seems impossible. Crazy Horse, a indian who know what the right thing to do is, he was famous for leading the battle of little bighorn. After reading online sources, it is clear that Crazy horse is a brave and fearless indian leader based on the information I read.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are six perspectives of justice; Crime Control Perspective, Rehabilitation Perspective, Due Process Perspective, Nonintervention Perspective, Equal Justice Perspective, and Restoration Perspective. The Due Process Perspective is the most ideal justice perspective that has been implemented over time. In order to more understand that biases take into account the other six perspectives.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant’s end in itself theory is stated by him, “Act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never simply as a means but always at the same time as an end.” This explains that if we use another person, whether directly or indirectly, in actions we make that we not just use them to get what we want in the end, our maxim, but also in way that also benefits their personal ends, or goals, also.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author William Shakespeare shows the theme, the course of true lover never does run smooth, in his play Romeo and Juliet. Juliet who is a Capulet fell in love with Romeo who is a Montague. Despite their deep love, everything seemed to pull them apart. Shakespeare shows this theme by introducing the hatred between the Capulet’s and the Montague’s, the banishment of Romeo, and the death of the two lovers.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are two distinct kinds of retributive justice. The classical definition embraces the idea that the amount of punishment must be proportional to the amount of harm caused by the offense. A more recent version, supported by Michael Davis, discharges this idea and replaces it with the idea that the amount of punishment must be proportional to the amount of unfair advantage gained by the wrongdoer. Davis introduced this version of retributive justice in the early 1980s, at a time when retributive justice was making a recovery within the philosophy of law community, maybe due to the multiple failures of reform theory in the previous years. In the early period of all systems of law the redress of wrongs takes precedence over the enforcement…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    * Justice refers to the theory that everyone is entitled to a fair and equal share of resources regardless of who they are or how much they have contributed. (ANA, n.d.)…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way Kant applied his famous and first formula, namely the Formulas of Universal Law (FUL) and the Formula of Law of Nature (FLN) to four famous examples of maxims contrary to duty, in his major works (the Groundwork, Metaphysical of Moral and Critique of Practical Reason), supports the thought that Kant’s ethical theory might be understood as a constructivist under the standard model. Wood puts this connection as follows:…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason. He further states that our moral duties are unconditional, universally valid, and necessary, regardless of the possible consequences or opposition to our inclinations (Pojman and Vaughn 239).…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Restitution places the victim squarely at the center of the sentencing phase of a crime. Restitution sentencing promotes the idea that the person convicted of a crime should make reparations (money restitution, an apology, etc.)…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just Deserts

    • 2084 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Since the dawn of time retributive justice in the form of "Let the punishment fit the crime" has been the principle guiding the penalties handed out for various criminal acts, or at least what was defined by the society and the time as a criminal act.…

    • 2084 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 3

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Restorative Justice: “A sentencing model that builds on restitution and community participation in an attempt to make the victim “whole again”. Crime is an act against another person or the community. (Criminal Law Today: Frank Schmalleger, Ph.D.)…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Immoral actions such as possession and use of drugs are common elements relating to crimes. Notably, these variables impact the procedure of applying the law fairly to all offenders of all crimes. Though restorative justice and retribution may work together in theory, it may not work in practice. Thus, our current system of retribution, (which identifies with negative judgment), is the prevailing form of justice in our society. The principle of Retributive justice is to correct the wrong and prevent retaliation by the…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Retribution is the theory that the criminal deserves to be punished and deserves to be punished in proportion to the gravity of his or her crime, whether or not the victim or anyone else desires it. We may all deeply regret having to carry out the punishment, but consider it warranted.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Shapland (2011) Justice is defined as the quality of being righteous, fair; equitableness or moral correctness. Justice is a term that can be very tricky and many people have often and easily confused with or used interchangeably with the term fairness. In most circumstances, whether at your workplace, your school, your local pub, or in the courtroom, people want to believe that they always want to feel that they deserve and are owed to be treated fairly after being wronged. There are two different types of justice such as Restorative Justice and Retributive Justice. Restorative justice has recently become a very popular yet controversial topic. With it being such a controversial topic there have been a few key elements of the restorative justice program that have been at a longstanding debate. They key elements consist of weather restorative justice should be defined as a result or a process, whether the approach should contain some type of form of punishment, and lastly, whether the approach should contain some type or form of punishment, and lastly whether or not it should be considered as a replacement to the traditional criminal justice system or be integrated into it.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Restoration, either in monetary damages or some action that needs to be done by the guilty defendant, often tries to compensate the victims through victim-offender mediation (O'Connor 1). While restorative justice may be more helpful to the victim and tries to right the wrong, it is clear that America is a country that uses retributive justice. America currently has the highest incarceration rates in the world, with over two million humans behind bars. (O'Connor 1). Looking at American justice through the idea of retribution, the courts must decide what punishment the guilty should receive in relation to their crime. The punishment that most criminals receive is jail time. Murderers and the most offensive crimes have the chance of being charged with capital sentences, the most permanent form of retributive…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays