Kant's Categorical Imperative Essay

In the formulations of Kant’s categorical imperative: “Act only in agreement with that saw through which you can at the same time with that it become a universal law.” Philosophers argues that senses of the supreme principle of morality is an average of wisdom that can be styled the “categorical imperative”. Perhaps the strongest argument that philosophers gives for that claim relies on the claim that morality requires justification by the principle which means that all immoral actions are irrational because they interrupt the categorical imperative. However, the moral requirements are based on standards of rationality. In this paper, I will argue that this argument can be apply in real life, based on the morality, Kant’s formula equals the worth and deserving of equal respect and humanity itself.
In morality of life good, bad and behavior are always valued. “Kant’s formula equals the worth,” the philosopher Locke and Aquinas differentiation the political state and argues about agreement and the moral requirements that the equal worth in historical possibility, that sentences, and the linguistics terms they involve, have senses, in addition to referents. Equal worth are treating everyone same, give same respect, value, and attention which can morally bring happiness, because if humans are not giving humans rights then this world will be sad, good will comes from good will people who goes good
Yet in the Evaluation of Pure Reason, Kant also tried to show that every event has a cause. Kant acknowledged that there appears to be a secret nervousness between these two statements: If causal determinism is true then, it seems, we cannot have the kind of freedom that morality assumes, which is “a kind of causality” that “can be active, independently of unknown causes responsible