Preview

Karl Marx and Capitalism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1349 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Karl Marx and Capitalism
Karl Marx and Capitalism
9056-60463
Word Count: 1113

In this essay, I argue that Karl Marx’s explanation of capitalism should compel the average person to action and change. First, I explain Marx’s idea of capitalism and how it hinders the average person. Second, I discuss how Marx argues for consciousness, criticism, anti-alienation, and anti-exploitation. Third, I provide and answer possible counter examples for Marx’s ideas on communism and capitalism. Finally, I address some of the ways that Marx might respond to my observations and objections. Capitalism is defined by Marx as a socio-economic system based especially on private ownership of the means of production and the exploitation of the labor force. (Felluga) Commodification is the process of a human’s value being replaced by his or her monetary value. (Felluga) Marx uses the terms proletariat, bureaucracy, and aristocrats, which essentially mean lower, middle, and upper classes, respectively. (Marx, Manifesto) The means of production is a term for the tools and raw materials used to create a product. Marx argues that capitalism functions as “the circulation of money as capital is an end in itself, for the valorization of value takes place only within this constantly renewed movement. The movement of capital is therefore limitless” (Marx, Capital) Marx argues that because the movement of capital is limitless, then capitalists strive for “the unceasing movement of profit-making” (Marx, Capital). I claim that this socio-economic system promotes a competition for basic needs to humans by putting prices, and since everyone aims to obtain all assets, some people will ultimately be left without basic needs. Marx instead argues for a more communal distribution of the means of production for the people would allow a better life for everyone. Marx argues that consciousness is something people develop overtime rather than it being inherently human. Marx is weary of false consciousness, which is the



Cited: Felluga, Dino. "Marxism Terms." Marxism Terms. Purdue U., 1 Jan. 2011. Web. 29 July 2013. Marx, Karl. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Harmondsworth: Penguin in Association with New Left Review, 1990. Print. Marx, Karl. "Letters: Letters from the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher." Letters: Letters from the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher by Karl Marx. N.p., July 2013. Web. 27 July 2013. Marx, Karl. "Manifesto of the Communist Party." Manifesto.org. Progress Publishers, 2004. Web. 27 July 2013. Matheis, Christian. "PHIL 1304 - Lecture Notes - Marx & Criticism and Marx & Historical Materialism." Https://scholar.vt.edu/portal/site/2a4ef60f-31dc-4277-ac60-858e046dd6d7/page/ae4944ae-3c3b-44f1-9fce-c8cb0ca5fd2c. Virginia Tech, 14 July 2013. Web. 28 July 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. "Proletarians and Communists." The Communist Manifesto. London: Penguin, 1985. Print.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx: the German philosopher with his works the communist manifesto and capital, provide a bitter critique of capitalism.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Marx, Karl, Engels, Friedrich edited by McLellan, David. The Communist Manifesto. New York, United States: Oxford University Press, 1992. Print.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels, and Martin Puchner. The Communist Manifesto and Other Writings. New York: Barnes & Noble, 2005. Print.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx, K. H. (1867). Capital. (4 ed., Vol. 1). Chicago: Charles H. Kerr and Co.…

    • 1812 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Marxism Anti Democratic

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to answer this question the parameters of the discussion must first be set, with key terms in the title defined. Marxism I define to be ‘an economic and socio-political worldview and method of socio-economic enquiry which focuses upon a materialist interpretation of history, a dialectical view of social change and an analysis and critique of capitalism. ‘ Democracy, I define to be an ‘egalitarian form of government in which sovereignty is vested in the people and exercised by them or elected agents.’ In the following essay I will present two opposing interpretations of Marxism, with both leading to wildly divergent conclusions regarding the democratic nature of Marxism. The first perspective revolves around a literal interpretation of Marxism; with the emphasis being entirely on Marx’s writings as oppose to any subsequent interpretations or manifestations of his beliefs. The second perspective involves an empirical study of Marxism, with various Marxist regimes analyzed and the extent to which they are democratic being the primary means of assessing as to whether Marxism is democratic or not. The following two quotations, I believe demonstrate the polarity of opinion existing on Marxism and Democracy and accurately summarize the two perspectives I will be arguing; Hal Draper (1978) states ‘Marx’s socialism maybe most quickly defined, as the complete democratization of society, not merely of political forms,’ and Joseph Femia ‘Communist despotism was a logical consequence of Marxist theory.’ In the first part of the essay, I will outline Marx’s theory of the state and democracy which supports the argument that Marxism is not theoretically anti-democratic. In the second part of the essay I will present the view that as a result of their being such significant empirical evidence in opposition to this thesis I believe it is hard to argue that Marxism can be viewed as democratic. Marx stated ‘The question whether human…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 18 ]. Marx, et al,: On Historical Materialism, Moscow: Progress Publisher, 1972, 1sted, P.137.…

    • 4590 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx is regarded by many as the first social scientist ever. Although it is argued that Adam Smith was the first great economist, and David Ricardo the first great modern economist, Marx is undoubtedly the economist that has had the biggest impact on economic history. It was he that masterminded the concept of a socialist utopia, which ultimately led to over a third of the world been ruled under the communist regime , a model that Marx concocted. Born on 5 May 1818, in Trier, one of Germany's oldest cities, Marx was the first economist who infused history, philosophy, economics, sociology and political theory all into his work. Marx was ahead of his time, his theories were ground breaking, only time would tell whether his predictions would come to fruition. Marx's main claim was that capitalism would eventually fall due to its own internal contradictions and faults, to be replaced by a socialist utopia, so to speak. Marx had many complex motives behind the eventual fall of capitalism, he delves in to great detail about these reasons in his masterpiece Capital (1867), in this text Marx writes about how the capitalist system will falter over time due to the way it operates. It is these faults of the capitalist system that are brought in to question when analysing an issue of this nature, what weaknesses did Marx identify in his writings and were these weaknesses evident in the capitalist system come the end of the twentieth century?…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Matrix Essay

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * Marx, Karl. "The German Ideology." Karl Marx: Selected Writings. Ed. David McLellan. Oxford: Oxford University, 1977. pag168,178. Print.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx vs. Weber

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    capitalist mode of production is the determining factor of an individual’s class position. Marx uses his…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx is considered a modernist because his views and theories fit the meaning of Modernity, which are human freedom and the right to free choice. To Marx, Capitalism is a barrier to the notion of human freedom and choice. Five aspects of his political theory which are modern, is how he views human nature, effects of Capitalism on human natures with emphasis on significance of labour, class struggles within Capitalism, the demise of Capitalism and the need for the transition to Communism. In this essay I am going to study Karl Marx and Max Weber views on Capitalism and how they think it has originated and developed.…

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Individual and society

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages

    ‘Focuses on the social system as a whole and its functional requirements are normally that of structural sociology’ (Calhoun, C et al 2002) However Marxism a conflict theory of sociology takes exactly this focus when analysing how an individual creates an identity and relationship within society. Marxism as a Macro-theory of sociology focuses on ‘human agents as cogs in the machine of social forces’ (Calhoun, C et al 2002) who have little or no control over the development of their identities, because of the overpowering social superstructure which is dictating a social hierarchy of which they are forced to obey. This large scale view of society as over powering in the formation of one’s identity is not that taken by ‘Micro-sociologist who emphasise the social system as being a human creation, rather than one which is imposed on individuals by the system; thus micro sociologists see social order as being produced from below […] created and maintained by the institutions we actively produce.” (Calhoun, C et al 2002) It is this explanation of micro-sociologists like Mead which give room to theories like his of the symbolic self which belong within the category of action theories; and more closely associated with Symbolic Interactionism.…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kilcullen, John. "MARX ON CAPITALISM." Division of Humanities. Macquarie University. Web. 28 Feb. 2012. <http://www.humanities.mq.edu.au/Ockham/y64l06.html>.…

    • 4211 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of Development

    • 2192 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Marx, K. (1993). Grunddrise: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough draft) Trans. Martin Nicolaus. London: Penguin Books.…

    • 2192 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays