Kathleen Parker addresses politics, culture, and contemporary issues in her twice-weekly column for the Washington Post. Parker approaches these issues with both sarcasm and incisiveness, and both show through her humorous and insightful columns. Parker’s writes from the perspective of a middle-aged, middle-class, white women and shares beliefs that might be expected for her demographic might be expected. She is an advocate for women’s rights, despises Trump, and has a clear sense of right and wrong. Parker makes little effort to connect with her audience of middle class white women, rarely interjecting herself into a column or using personal experience to support a point.
An experienced journalist, Parker masterly weaves satire into her social and political commentary. This makes Parker a “perceptive, often witty” columnist who offers a unique perspective on an array of various …show more content…
Parker almost never interjects herself into a story and rarely shares personal experiences. Instead, Parker connects with her audience through shared beliefs and sense of humor. This is fairly easy for Parker to accomplish as she writes to an audience similar to her own demographic. In her column “So we’re banning words now? Here’s my list.”, Parker connects to her audience of middle-aged, middle-class, white women by expressing frustration directed towards the repurposing of words these days. Like Parker, her target audience is old enough to have grown up in an age of contemporary diction, but young enough to keep up and notice the mass repurposing of vocabulary. By writing to an audience that shares many of the same characteristics as her, Parker can easily relate to her target audience. This allows Parker to connect with her audience without having to interject herself into the story, an attribute which can damage the credibility of a