Preview

Summary Of Kathleen Parker's 'So We Re Banning Words Now?'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
444 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Kathleen Parker's 'So We Re Banning Words Now?'
Columnist Response #2
Kathleen Parker’s op-ed, “So we’re banning words now? Here’s my list,” published December 19th, asserts that it is absurd for the government to ban words that are simply discomforting. Parker achieves this by giving a background on the recent banning of seven words by the US government and then offers her own list of words which she has has a problem with to show the ridiculous nature of trying to ban words. This op-ed argues that the government cannot ban words and that usage of “new” words in today’s society is detracting from the written English language. Parker achieves this with through a sarcastic tone targeted at a politically moderate, young adult, audience.
Parker employs a sarcastic tone throughout the article

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this article, Deborah S. Connelly talks about the history of book banning, its presence in society today, and actions that have and can be taken against it. Most of these actions stem from the responsibility of librarians and organizations. Connelly believes that librarians have an obligation to keep their content uncensored and readily available to the public. She has stated that the best way to prevent book censorship is to educate our society about the importance of diverse books. A more specific approach regarding this idea might be for a librarian to remind an opposing patron why the book on trial was bought in the first place, and what it could have to offer the reader. As said on the final page of her article, “Knowledge is the key…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Barrio Boy Analysis

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why should you undertake a mission? Well Ernesto Galarza, Farah Ahmedi, and Buck all undertook a mission. Some day you will have to undertake a mission or you already have undertaken a mission. Like these very different people and dogs did. This is an example that anyone or anything can or does undertake a mission.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parker almost never interjects herself into a story and rarely shares personal experiences. Instead, Parker connects with her audience through shared beliefs and sense of humor. This is fairly easy for Parker to accomplish as she writes to an audience similar to her own demographic. In her column “So we’re banning words now? Here’s my list.”…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Can words kill people?” (2017) Kathleen Parker (an Opinion Writer for The Washington Post) declares that while words matter, the First Amendment entitles each person to free speech. Parker reinforces her declaration by informing about the limits of free speech (“the Constitution’s protections for nearly every form of speech short of the ‘fire’-in-a-crowded-theater prohibition.”), giving an example of what should be considered free speech (Carter telling her boyfriend to kill himself but her not helping him or actually killing him), and claiming “Words do matter, but they’re not lethal.” She informs, gives an example, and makes a claim in order to illustrate why cases like Carter’s should not result in a conviction (“what she said to…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    That the censoring of one's language is a "violation of the First Amendment" and an attack on one's…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tropic Thunder Analysis

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The reason being that it comes with too big of a price and would be useless as a permanent solution. Bauer discusses the aftermath of Rahm Emanuel’s use of the R-word being that government fought to remove the term “mental retardation” from government agencies and state codes.They used this to contrast the origins of the word’s use, to convey dignity and respect. Their argument being that no matter how many times we purge words with negative connotations and replace them, taboos would just materialize once more, as can be seen in the replacement of the word idiot. Bauer also said that if a word is too stigmatized people develop what she calls a “word fetish”. This phenomena is backed by the writings of Harvard law professor Randall Kennedy, making it credible information. The example provided to back both claims was the case of David Howard nearly being fired for using the word “niggardly”. Overall Bauer’s evidence for this claim support her arguments well. She makes it clear that restrictions on speech create needless taboos and government restriction.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every one hundred years dialects change and what is considered “politically correct”, or socially acceptable, changes. “David Bradley argues that ‘if we'd eradicated the problem of racism in our society, Huckleberry Finn would be the easiest book in the world to teach’” (Zwick, Jim. “Should Huckleberry Finn Be Banned?”). If we, as a nation, make it a point to rule out all books that could possibly offend students, then every hundred years or so our library of American Literature will be completely different. Even today, modern day authors use vulgar language, lurid sexual content, and racial slurs to get their point across. If The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is taken off of required reading lists across the country, then that could create a never-ending cycle of books being taken off of school shelves every time words and ideas become unacceptable. If this is the way that American society is turning then something must be done, and the Superintendents, Deans, and Principals of every High School around the country must take it upon themselves to do it because the students will not.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No right is truly unlimited journalist Roger Rosenblatt would argue. Author Rosenblatt narrates “everyone loves free expression as long as it isn’t exercised” (501) in “We Are Free to Be You, Me, Stupid and Dead” as part from his essay collection titled Where We Stand: Thirty Reasons for Loving Our Country published in 2002. Rosenblatt informs his audience about the very controversial and objectionable value of freedom of expression, and what negative costs can ultimately stem from censoring language. Rosenblatt uses his credibility where he appeals to the every man/women reader’s emotions and logic criticizing any censorship on free expression, emphasizes the defending right on freedom of speech given by the Constitution. However, Rosenblatt includes many examples of the limitations placed on our free expression. Rosenblatt successfully engages…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the essay, Goodman discusses the modern misuse of words that evoke Hitler and the Nazis. He suggests that those who are desensitized to hate words are introduced as being too readily used in many environments. In addition, the essay also brings out the fact that hate words are being loosely used by many politicians tells us that desensitization of hate words are prevalent can extend even to important social figures as well.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt in their article “The Coddling of the American Mind”, a disturbing pattern is arising in which certain ideas, words, and actions are being censored based solely on claims of their “being offensive” or “triggering”. The authors argue that the culture of censorship originates from a good intentioned protectiveness imposed by baby boomers who had developed a more watchful way of raising children. However, this protectiveness has since devolved to be “vindictive” in nature. Students have started to abuse the power they hold in the academic world to bully both teachers and administration, creating a culture of fear of bringing up certain controversial, yet important issues. This has in turned allowed college aged students to believe that if there is a topic which they “cannot handle”, they can either remove…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A Virginia school district has pulled copies of “To Kill a Mockingbird” and “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” from classrooms and libraries while it weighs whether it should permanently ban the American classics because of the books’ use of racial slurs” (Balingit). Even though To Kill a Mockingbird is an all-time classic, it is also frequently banned in schools. The common reason for the novel’s removal is the use of language. Some parents want the book banned because they feel racial slurs should not be read by students. Parents uncomfortable with discovering these words, disagree with the book being used in schools. However, To Kill a Mockingbird is not the only book that is banned because of its word choice. Of Mice and Men is also…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thesis: The American society has become so politically correct, that no one is able to speak their mind without facing major judgment or discrimination.…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Zinczenko’s Don’t Blame the Eater, he appears to begin his article with an obvious sense of sarcasm when discussing…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    paper

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Is free speech and the dangers of limiting vocabulary only society’s choice of acceptable words? Is profanity even called for? Is it good or bad parenting to teach your children to use profanity at such a young age? Does censoring words hinder a person’s ability to express their opinion regarding something? Amendment One states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” (Constitution).…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays