Preview

Kelly V. Movie Theater

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1965 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kelly V. Movie Theater
A. Kelly v Movie Theater:

Negligence

Negligence requires a showing that a duty was owed, that the duty was breached, and that the breach was the actual and proximate cause of damages.

Special Duty – Land Occupier - Invitee

A special duty arises in circumstances involving a land occupier. An invitee is one who enters the land with the owner’s permission for the purpose related to the activity. The landowner owes an invitee a duty of care to inspect and discover any dangerous condition and to make the premises safe.

Kelly went to the Movie Theater to see a movie. Hence, Kelly is a social guest entering with Movie Theater’s permission and thus an invitee. Because Kelly was an invitee, The Movie Theater owed a duty to Kelly to inspect the premises, discover, and remove any known dangers.

Breach

The Movie Theater knew that restroom sink pipe was broken and did not warn Kelly, or any other patron, of the leaky sink pipe in the restroom. Theater did not warn of water in front of the restroom sinks. Their failure to warn Kelly of the dangerous condition was a breach of their duty of due care.

However, the Movie Theater will argue that they did call for a plumber to fix the pipe and the plumber could not come until the following day. Further, they sent an employee into the restroom to mop up the water every 15 minutes. However, Movie Theater should have placed some type of warning of the water.

Therefore, Movie Theater breached their duty of due care owed to Kelly.

Actual Causation

“But for” the failure to warn of the water in front of the restroom sink in the girls restroom Kelly would not have slipped on a puddle of water and suffer a painful shoulder injury.

Thus, the Movie Theater is the actual cause of Kelly’s injuries

Proximate Causation

It is foreseeable if you fail to warn of a puddle of water on the floor, that one could slip and become injured.

Therefore, Movie Theater is the proximate cause of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The store states that employees are scheduled to check every aisle at the beginning of the hour and none were aware of the spill on the floor. The aisle was last checked half an hour before Smith fell, according to the inspection log.…

    • 530 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Simons has been employed by the Mall as a security sergeant for four years. Simon’s duties include walking through the Mall to inspect the common areas for substances that could cause customers to slip and fall. Simons was working on June 13th, 2003, and between 4:19 and 4:21 p.m., Simons inspected the area where Patterson later fell and did not see any substance, including cheese that would pose a danger as a potential slip or fall. Had Simons noticed such a substance he would have notified housekeeping to clean it. Simons was informed after 4:25 p.m. that a customer had fallen in the area he had just inspected and he returned immediately to assist Patterson.…

    • 2827 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    mgmt 597 course project

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In August 1992, Elizabeth Stroot and a roommate, Joletta Watson, moved into an apartment on the third floor of Haverford Place. (Case Law) While living in this apartment with Watson, Stroot immediately discovered mold around the windows and bathroom. Upon this discovery, Stroot attempted to remove the mold with bleach, however, the mold keep returning. In addition to the mold, Stroot also discovered leaks in her bedroom ceiling and in the kitchen and bathroom sinks. About a year later, in September 1993, Stroot’s roommate, Watson, moved out and Stroot moved into a one bedroom apartment in a different building within Haverford Place. After moving in, Stroot discovered that the bathroom ceiling in the new apartment also leaked. After living there for a few months, the leaks had caused holes in the drywall and there was a black substance covering the edges of the holes. Whenever the shower was on in the apartment above Stroot’s, black water ran out of the holes. Stroot informed management and some efforts were made to fix the upstairs shower. No repairs were made in Stroot’s apartment. The landlord stated that “the problem was caused by the upstairs tenants taking “sloppy” showers.” A few months later, on May 6 1994, Stroot called emergency maintenance because the hold in her bathroom ceiling was expanding and had become very large. It was no longer just a leak; she stated it was “raining”. Maintenance came to inspect her apartment and said that they would fix…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Summary

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort of negligence in this scenario includes the five essential elements of negligence, duty, breach of duty, the breach being the cause of injury, proximate, and the resulting damages (Lucas, 2008). In a case of negligence the individual or company may be held liable not only with negligence but sometimes with trespass, injury, and even mental or emotional harm (Lucas, 2008). However, the law requires these elements are proven in order to recover in a law suit against a torfeasor for negligence (Melvin,…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    july at the multiplex

    • 1380 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mr. Mull T. Plex and the consortium of theaters around the area have hired our consulting team to analyze and break down the litigation against the Royal Theater made by Tommy. Tommy is suing the Royal Theater on charges of fraudulent misrepresentation and the consortium of theaters is very well concerned with the possibility of a class action lawsuit that could prevail from this case. Tommy’s lawsuit is based on his experience at the Royal Theater during the screening of movie “The Governator.” After a displeasing chain of events, Tommy demanded a full refund in which Royal Theater refused. Mr. Plex and the consortium of theaters have asked us to assess the situation and to authenticate whether or not…

    • 1380 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Cheeseman (2013), negligence is a "A doctrine that says a person is liable for harm that is the foreseeable consequence of his or her actions" (p.91). The elements of negligence include:…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hall & Upson Co. – Smithwick was told not to work on a platform but was not told that the wall was about to collapse. He worked on platform despite the warning because he believed the risk of falling was the only danger. The court held that the failure to heed a warning is not contributory negligence if the injury was the result of a different source of risk caused by the defendant, and the injured party was unaware of that risk.”…

    • 3010 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Any special requirement would have also been discussed at the initial assessment ie entry by the front or back door, keysafe number, security door number, whether they would like the doorbell rung before entering etc.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trina's Negligence

    • 2502 Words
    • 11 Pages

    To be negligent, the condition of defendant’s property must present an unreasonable risk of harm to people on the property. Here, the puddle of water in the middle of the floor was not an unreasonable risk of harm because it was a thin puddle that was easily noticeable by anyone glancing around. However, the water was on a tile floor where there was customer traffic, making the area slippery when wet. There…

    • 2502 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hsa 515 Law and Health

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The first element that a plaintiff must prove is that the defendant owed him or her legal duty of care. Generally, this duty of care is a legal notion that states that people owe anyone around them or anyone who could be around them a duty to not place them in situations of undue risk of harm. Proving this element will largely depend on the facts of the situation. After the plaintiff has proved that a legal duty of care existed, he or she must then prove that this duty was breached. Generally, courts will use the standard of a ‘reasonable person’ when it comes to this question. Specifically, this means that the judge or jury must view the facts of the situation and decide what a reasonable person would have done in a similar situation. If this reasonable person would have acted differently than the defendant, it’s likely that it will be found that the duty was breached. Causation is the most complicated element of negligence. It means that the plaintiff must prove that the defendant either directly or indirectly caused the injuries and damages suffered by the plaintiff because of the breach of the duty of care. This element has confused even the most respected legal minds over time, and its proof should not be taken lightly. Last, a plaintiff in a negligence case must prove a legally recognized harm, usually in the form of physical injury to a person or to property. It is not enough that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care. The failure to exercise reasonable care must result in actual damages to a person to whom the defendant owed a duty of care (FindLaw 2012). These damages can be actual costs such as medical expenses and lost income or intangible costs such as pain and suffering or loss of companionship.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negligence consists of four different elements: duty, breach, causation, and damages. In order to collect damages for the harm done the claimant must prove several things: the duty of care one owes to another, the standard of care expected by one from another, breach of the duty of care, and damage(s) either physical, emotional or monetary. In…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One very important issue in this case and many civil lawsuits is negligence. Negligence is when there is a failure to use reasonable care which results in injury or damage to another. It also asks who is responsible for one’s injury. In this case, Mrs. McKoy claims her injuries were caused by T & J’s negligent behavior. In order to prove negligence, T & J must be guilty of five elements: duty of due care, breach, factual cause, proximate cause, and damages.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This legal duty of care, means they must do everything reasonably possible to create a safe environment. The duty of care includes using wet floor signs when spills occur. Management's failure to place these A-framed caution signs on wet and slippery places would represent a violation of their duty of care. That violation would be considered negligence. An exception to the duty of care rule, states, to be negligent, employees must have a reasonable amount of time to discover the issue. If they did not have time to see a potential hazard and fix it, the company may not be considered negligent and therefore not be responsible for any injuries. The facts state that the employee cleaned up the spill and placed the sign ten-minutes prior to when the crowds would start coming through that area. The employee did not know the sign had been knocked over by the crowd and therefore the act would not be considered negligent. However, even though the sign originally had a legitimate reason for being there, did the reason still exist when Brown tripped over…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    208 Task C Case Studies

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Winston is a social care worker supporting young people with learning disabilities in the community. One evening, he visits an individual to find that a pipe has burst in their roof, water is running down the light fitting and onto the bathroom floor.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    law- food/beverage

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An innkeeper owes certain duties to those who use the hote's facilities - Right to be Received.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics