Two ethical issues associated with psychological testing are confidentiality and informed consent. Confidentiality deals with keeping the patient or examinees information confidential and private. Leaking the examinee or patient’s personal information is a violation of what constitutes ethical practice because there is a trust that is built between the examiner and examinee. Informed consent deals with whether the patient or examinee is willing and knowing that they are being examined and studied. Some tests may call for an examinee not knowing that they are being examined, but it is important to allow the examinee to have the general knowledge that they are about to or currently are being examined. It is unethical to study and watch someone without their knowing that they are partaking in such as study.…
Describe one ethical consideration that a psychologist undertaking a study to research the brain should take into account. Give an…
Virtual research also opens up ethical issues such as deception. Since subjects typically do not meet the researchers, it becomes possible for researchers to create entirely new personas to better their research (“Readings in virtual research ethics”, 2004). While researchers could be deceptive, it is also possible that participants could be deceptive. In addition to deception there are ethical concerns over minors participating in research studies online.…
After gaining a clear understanding in regards to research, I’ve learned that it’s not necessarily what we find out from research but, where we gathered the information. We always need to be concerned with how we went about finding the information. With all information gathered, we must also gather participants. It is important to gather all participants to find the most accurate results, as well as ensuring equal treatment of all participants. One major step to ensure proper treatment is to gather informed consent. By doing so, this allows all participants to understand all parts of research that may affect their decision in participating. This obviously doesn’t indicate that we have given full disclosure, so that it doesn’t affect our end results. A safeguard is put in place to…
One of todays biggest ethical dilemmas can be found in the Medical field. We all turn our heads away and cringe when we hear the term "human test subjects", as the past has been dark and far from any morality in this domain; yet we do not cease to use the findings of the sadistic experiments. Researchers now use mice and other animals which can show the effects a(n) medication/evolution/disease may have on humans. But I find testing on clueless animals immoral.…
In this assignment, I will be discussing the ethical issues relating to research in health and social care.…
Goode, E., (1996). The ethics of deception in social research. A case study, 19, 11-12…
The ethical issues when working with humans is that participants have the right to withdraw, not to be deceived, confidentiality, protection from physical and psychological harm and the right to be debriefed after the study.…
Test subjects are told of the deception as soon as possible without affecting the experiments outcome. They are debriefed after the study to make sure they will not have any bad effects. Most psychologists are against opposed to the use of deception.…
Deception refers to deliberately withholding and misleading information to the participant (“Deception Topics,” n.d.). Using deliberate deception to get an individual to participate in a study is always unethical, though not all research can be done without deception. For example, if researchers believe the participants may change their behavior if they know details, those details may be intentionally left out. If this occurs, researchers must provide alternate designs and procedures of the study. If there are no alternatives, the researchers must be able to justify their use of deception (“Deception Topics,” n.d.). Some researchers believe that deception is necessary, at times, to maintain validity, although other researcher’s feel it is always unacceptable (“Deception Topics,”…
Describe one ethical issue mentioned in the text that you have encountered. Why is informed consent necessary for ethical…
One might argue that misrepresentation of academic credentials as demonstrated by Marilee Jones, the dean of admissions at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Lewin, 2007) and a lie are not the same thing. She knowingly falsified information and suppressed it for several years; this is an ethical misrepresentation of epic proportions. When people misrepresent skill sets or academic accomplishments to achieve certain goals, they chose to play an ethical game of “Truth or Dare”. Crime in any form is a choice made by a human, and they should have to deal with the consequences.…
Fundamental to ethical research is respect for the autonomy of research participants. Autonomy refers to the right of an individual to make decisions about those things that affect them. In the context of research, participants should have the opportunity to make an informed decision about whether to participant in research or not. For consent to be valid it should be informed, it should be voluntary and the person giving consent should have the capacity to give that consent (Beauchamp and Childress,…
“The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman is a story of a woman who finds she is slowly slipping into insanity. The woman knows she is unwell, but her husband John who is a doctor, describes her illness as a temporary depressive nervousness. Because John is a doctor, he believes that he knows best, and has confined her to a room within a home they rented. In order to help his wife, John has set limits to what his wife will and will not participate in. John orders her to rest and to relieve herself from writing or any type of work. In doing so, the woman slowly begins to disassociate herself from reality. She has become so obsessed with the yellow wallpaper in the room, that the figure trapped behind the wallpaper is becoming more…
Researchers have an ethical obligation to their colleagues and scientific community. In this scenario the researcher has an obligation to make the error known to their readers and should publish the book, but note that twenty five of the survey interviews were falsified by the interviewers because by not doing so would be unethical.…