Preview

King James Achievements

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1118 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
King James Achievements
The first stuart king of England, king of Scottland from 1567 to 1625 is also known as King James 1st. King James influenced many people, the bible and other kings in his era. King James was born June 19, 1566, Edinburgh castle, Edinburgh Scottland, he died on March 27, 1625, Theobalds, Hertfordshire, England.

James was the only son of Mary, Queen of Scots, and her second husband, Henry Stewart, Lord Danley. Eight months after James’s birth his father died when his house was destroyed by an explosion. After her third marriage, to James Hepburn, Earl of bothwell, Mary was defeated by Scottish lords and rejected the throne. James who was not even a year old at the time became king of Scotland on July 24, 1567; Mary left the kingdom on May 16, …show more content…
In 1589 James was married to Anne, the daughter of Frederick II of Denmark, who, in 1594, gave birth to their first son, Prince Henry. James’s rule of Scotland was basically successful. He was able to play off protestant and Roman Catholic factions of Scottish nobles against each other, and through a group of commissioners known as the Octavians (1596-97), he was able to rule Scotland almost as absolutely as Elizabeth ruled England. But in 1584 he secured a series of acts that made him head of the Presbyterian church in Scotland, with the power to set the church’s …show more content…
James practically doubled the debt left by Elizabeth, and it was hardly surprising that when his chief minister, Robert Cecil, Earl of Salisbury, tried in 1610-11 to exchange the kings feudal revenues for a fixed annual sum from Parliament, the negotiations over this so called Great Contract came to nothing. James dissolved Parliament in 1611.

The death of Cecil in 1612, marked the turning point of James’s reign; he was never to have another chief minister who was so experienced and so powerful. During the ensuing 10 years the king summoned only the brief unpopular expedients, such as the sale of monopolies, to raise funds. During these years the king succumbed to the influence of the incompetent Robert Carr, Earl of Somerset. Carr was succeeded as the king’s favorite by George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham, who showed more ability as chief minister but who was even more hated for his arrogance and his monopoly of royal
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Were the Difficulties Faced by Charles Ii Due More to Financial Concerns Than Foreign Policy?
    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Were the Difficulties Faced by Charles Ii Due More to Financial Concerns Than Foreign Policy?

    A substantial difficulty that Charles II faced was that of finance. Finance was a major issue between crown and parliament, especially in-between the years 1665 to 1667. The Crown’s income had dropped by £200,000, and MPs believed that the problems were down to crown management rather than structural problems with the finance system. This shows that Charles II faced difficulties more to financial concerns as he was gaining a low income, concluding in him unable to fund and solve matters needed. It also shows that finance provoked further issues, as it is shown here to drive crown and parliament away from one another. Parliament also used finance to restrict the greater religious freedom Charles wanted to allow, again showing finance splitting the crown and parliament. In 1669 the commons used their financial influence over Charles in response to their concerns about his decision to allow the conventicle act to expire in 1668. Therefore in 1670 Charles issued a much more rigid conventicle act as the commons refused a £300,000 grant. The issues with finance clearly show the divide between Charles and Parliament, and these difficulties only increased.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To What Extent Do Monarch Push Or Reject Constitutionalism
    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To What Extent Do Monarch Push Or Reject Constitutionalism

    The rejection of constitutionalism by Charles I’s sour relationship with the Parliament and Oliver Cromwell’s dissolving of Parliament, along with the acceptance of constitutionalism through the Glorious Revolution during the reign of William and Mary all resulted in a strong English power and newly reinforced parliamentary rights.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Influence of William Cecil later Lord Burghley on Elizabeth and his role in her government
    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Influence of William Cecil later Lord Burghley on Elizabeth and his role in her government

    William Cecil’s influence touched on just about all aspects of policy that occurred during Elizabeth’s long reign. In the Royal Court he brought order and stability. Cecil was also highly influential in foreign policy. He saw France and Spain as threats to. It has also been argued that Cecil was not just the provider of advice and executor of the Queens wishes but also that he could have been the power behind the throne. Plenty of evidence has come to light that suggests that the Secretary regularly attempted to manipulate Elizabeth however it would be inaccurate to assume that all of Cecil’s personal agendas were fruitful, Elizabeth could make her own mind up and often did so. Although Cecil was a prominent figure during this time, Elizabeth was still the person who ruled the country and had her own ideas on how to run the country. Elizabeth was firmly in control of major policies and on many occasions obstinately ignored the Councils advice. The Council conscientiously carried out the Queens wishes even when it had advised otherwise. There is general agreement that, until its decline in the 1590s central government under Elizabeth was successful and that the Queen provided firm direction. According to Neale Parliament was another aspect that had influence over decision making in Elizabeth government He argues that the power of the House of Commons increased throughout Elizabeth’s reign. The number of conflicts Elizabeth had with individual MPs and the problems which the Stuarts experienced with Parliament are evidence for this. These developments were brought by the “Puritan Choir “who deliberately planned confrontations to force the issue of parliamentary privilege versus the royal prerogative. It is therefore necessary to investigate not only to what extent Cecil was involved in the decision making process but also the influence of the Parliament on Elizabeth and ultimately the decisions that were taken through this time of how many were Elizabeth’s own ideas.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism: Describe and analyze the changes in the role of Parliament in English politics between the succession of James and the Glorious Revolution.
    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Absolutism: Describe and analyze the changes in the role of Parliament in English politics between the succession of James and the Glorious Revolution.

    James I was an absolutist ruler who emphasized the divine right of kings and sought to restrain Parliament under his will. Consequently, conflicts were inevitable as James I, and ensuing rulers, often found himself deficient of funds, and Parliament served as the gateway to the money. James I and his successor Charles I called Parliamentary meetings solely to ascertain the issue of funds. During this period, Parliament was rarely called upon and after these debates for money, Charles I and James I completely dissolved the Parliament. I did so because he agreed to admit the illegality of his taxes in turn for funding from Parliament. Afterwards, he abolished the Parliament to pursue his own endeavors. Furthermore, during Charles tenure, the English Civil War took place as a result from the lack of amity between Charles and Parliament. The Scottish invaded England, but Parliament refused to allow Charles to raise an army, because they feared he would abuse his powers and assail English citizens who opposed him. Charles I was eventually defeated and executed by Oliver Cromwell. Following the inadequacy of Cromwell, Charles II rose to power and was keyed the "merry monarch" for his easy-going nature. He imposed the Cabal system, a group of five individuals who handled the political issues of England; the term Cabal stems from the initials of each official member. This system acted as a type of Parliament in its methods of governing. During this period as a whole, it is evident that Parliament often conflicted with the ideals of the ruling monarch.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Far Was James Successful in Dealing with the Problems Presented by Puritanism in 1611-1625?
    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Far Was James Successful in Dealing with the Problems Presented by Puritanism in 1611-1625?

    Throughout James’ reign, religion, especially Puritanism was kept respectably under control, however incurring minor ‘hiccups’ along the way. James was indifferent to religious prejudice and aimed to please both Catholics and protestants; introducing the Jacobean compromise. Before 1611 when Abbot succeeded Bancroft (previous archbishop), there were many glitches concerning the puritans including the Millenary Petition, Hampton Court Conference and Bancroft’s Cannons which caused mild uproar among puritans, however was short-lived. His main succession begun when pro-puritan Abbot became Archbishop in 1611. It wasn’t until 1618 when things took a turn for the worst.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Response Essay Example
    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dbq Response Essay Example

    King John was forced to signed the Magna Carta document. This greatly reduced his power. He couldn't collect large amounts of money and abuse the system.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    how far was buckingham influence on charles the main reason for personal rule
    • 1197 Words
    • 4 Pages

    how far was buckingham influence on charles the main reason for personal rule

    Buckingham formed a very close relationship with Charles which many MP’s feared. This close relationship and the amount of power that Buckingham possessed, often led to arguments between the King and Parliament, which eventually led to the king adopting personal rule. Buckingham monopolised Patronage at court, and advancement in Office was only approved with Buckingham support. Many MP’s were suspicious of his close relationship with both Charles 1 and James 1, and despised the fact that they could only gain advancement in the career with his consent. Furthermore Buckingham had arranged the marriage of Charles and Henrietta Maria who was Catholic. Many MP’s thought Buckingham was trying to introduce Catholicism in England, which they thought would threaten the ancient liberties of the Church of England. The king’s protection of Buckingham led to Parliament being dissolved which angered many MPs. In 1626 Parliament attempted to Impeach Buckingham, however the King stopped this by dissolving Parliament which prevented them from passing the subsidies which the King needed. These show how Buckingham’s action caused disputes between the King and Parliament, which eventually led to the king adopting Personal Rule as he thought he could manage without Parliament. However…

    • 1197 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did James Seek A Union With Parliament Essay
    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Did James Seek A Union With Parliament Essay

    Somerset an early favourite of James was influential within government, particularly in moving James towards a pro-Spanish foreign policy. However, it was the rise of George Villiers to royal favour that was of particular significance, politically. It was this one figure that held a monopoly on the Court and Government and stranglehold over the King’s favour and patronage. Many MP’s were hugely angered that they were being bypassed in the decision-making process and that a huge amount of the advice given to James came from non-elected men – many of whom he brought with him from Scotland, a problem because parliament were still Xenophobic against the…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Do You Think That Charles I or John Pym Was More to Blame for the Outbreak of the Civil War in the Summer of 1642?
    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Do You Think That Charles I or John Pym Was More to Blame for the Outbreak of the Civil War in the Summer of 1642?

    The relationship and status of the monarchy in parliament’s eyes had already been in a state of decline even before Charles’ reign. His predecessor had been known as the ‘wisest fool in Christendom’ and there was a lot of resentment towards the former king, James, not only because of the number of times he dissolved parliament but also from his abuse of power and alienation of them through royal prerogatives, which were justified by his own ‘divine right of kings’ belief. It could be argued that Charles was pulled into an uphill battle from the start and was not to blame for the damaged relationship between the commons and himself, however, during Charles’ reign, he made no attempt to reconcile relations even repeating the ideals of his father through the ‘divine right of kings’ and also through the arrogance of his attitude and subsequent dissolution of parliament on many occasions.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Was Elizabeth's Legacy To James
    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What Was Elizabeth's Legacy To James

    As is suggested in Source 12, ‘[Elizabeth] had to turn to parliament for assistance’ during much of her reign to fund wars which gave Parliament quite significant control over her policies. This realisation for parliament marked the beginning of an era of difficulties for monarchs and their parliaments. It can further be derived from Source 12 that ‘[parliament] used her need of [funds] to make their views known’. Parliament’s consistent use of this throughout James’ reign in questioning his authority (and therefore sparking a debate over divine right and parliamentary privilege) and policies was an attempt by Parliament to make themselves a necessary commodity. This is corroborated by Source 13, ‘If accept that kings have the power of imposing new and higher duties and the right to do this is confirmed, I do not see and likelihood of future parliaments.’ Parliament’s use of subsidies to control the monarch is further confirmed in Source 12, ‘they forced the queen to concede the substance of their demands’. However, far from making themselves indispensable (as is shown to be their intention in Source 13, ‘Where prince’s prerogatives grow, the liberties of subjects diminish’) Parliament primarily succeeded in driving a greater wedge between themselves and James. James…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Trade Vs Manorialism
    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Trade Vs Manorialism

    Each of the english monarchs had grown more and more power. William tightened the iron fist by creating feudalism 2.0, the domesday book, and built plenty of castles. Henry I followed suit, establishing the exchequer and creating traveling judges to try courts, then Henry II, started a 12 man jury and allowed nobles to buy their way out of becoming a knight. So when Henry II died and left his son, John, to the throne, it seemed natural that the king's power would continue to grow...well not exactly this time (sorry King John). Nobody really liked King John. He was always trying to increase taxes, including illegal church taxes and noble's taxes, and inevitably lost most of England's french land ( AU REVOIR JOHNNY). Usually, the…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Influence Of King James I
    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Influence Of King James I

    King James I, the son of Mary, Queen of Scots, and Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley, was coronated to king of England in the year 1603 in which he was already an experienced monarch due to the fact that he has been ruling over Scotland since 1567. James believed that kings are a representation of god on earth and that kings cannot be judged or punished by the “mere” humans but by god. Even though he did not have any obligations to obey the law he did anyways to be an example to his followers. One significant attribute of King James was that he was the first one to reign sovereignly in the three monarchical kingdoms…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did the Civil War Begin?
    • 2630 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Why Did the Civil War Begin?

    On 22 August 1642, King Charles I raised his battle standard and declared a civil war against his enemies in Parliament.…

    • 2630 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Francis Bacon Dbq
    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Francis Bacon Dbq

    As a parliament he was never exceeded nor respected by society due to his debt. Even though his job paid well it didn’t put a dent, and with the expenses of travel and other expenses it didn’t help him more forward anymore, even where James the first came to play.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why King Charles I was unpopular
    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why King Charles I was unpopular

    4. Charles dissolved parliament three times between 1625 and 1629. In 1629, he dismissed parliament and resolved to rule alone.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics