James I was an absolutist ruler who emphasized the divine right of kings and sought to restrain Parliament under his will. Consequently, conflicts were inevitable as James I, and ensuing rulers, often found himself deficient of funds, and Parliament served as the gateway to the money. James I and his successor Charles I called Parliamentary meetings solely to ascertain the issue of funds. During this period, Parliament was rarely called upon and after these debates for money, Charles I and James I completely dissolved the Parliament. I did so because he agreed to admit the illegality of his taxes in turn for funding from Parliament. Afterwards, he abolished the Parliament to pursue his own endeavors. Furthermore, during Charles tenure, the English Civil War took place as a result from the lack of amity between Charles and Parliament. The Scottish invaded England, but Parliament refused to allow Charles to raise an army, because they feared he would abuse his powers and assail English citizens who opposed him. Charles I was eventually defeated and executed by Oliver Cromwell. Following the inadequacy of Cromwell, Charles II rose to power and was keyed the "merry monarch" for his easy-going nature. He imposed the Cabal system, a group of five individuals who handled the political issues of England; the term Cabal stems from the initials of each official member. This system acted as a type of Parliament in its methods of governing. During this period as a whole, it is evident that Parliament often conflicted with the ideals of the ruling monarch.
Following Charles II's death, his brother James II ascended the throne. As another absolutist, James II was a ruthless ruler who attempted to propel England back to Catholicism. This drew the ire of the English masses, and Parliament was unable to impede James' ventures. Thus, William of Orange invaded England but garnered the support of the English subjects and compelled James II to abdicate his throne. In the aftermath, William and Mary of Orange became rulers of England, indicating the supremacy of Parliament, as Mary, the Protestant daughter of James II from his first marriage, served the purposes of Parliament. The English Bill of Rights was established along with the groundwork for English constitutionalism; this Bill of rights weakened the power of royalty and subsequently fortified the power of the Parliament. Among the laws outlined by the Bill were that the king could not attack Parliament members and members could not be punished for statements made during debates. Following the Glorious Revolution and William's uprising, the cabinet system was introduced, which selected a member from Parliament to be Prime Minister; Robert Walpole was then recognized as the first one.
As France and the eastern European nations inclined towards absolutism, England drifted towards constitutionalism, emphasizing a strong Parliamentary influence upon the state.
"History of Europe." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2010. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 18 Jan. 2010 .
Hooker, Richard. "Absolutism." The European Enlightenment Glossary Ed. Richard Hooker. N.p., 14 July 1999. Web. 10 Jan. 2010. .
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Charles I did not go along with the parliament. He took a serious hit during his 22 years as king. He began to give into extra parliamentary resorts such as, new tariffs and duties and collection of discontinued taxes. This angered the parliament as taxes were being illegally collected for an already unfortunate war and one that involved France…
- 637 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In January 1649, King Charles I was executed after being charged with high treason due to political and religious reasons, some of which contributed to his refusal in accepting the peace settlements given to him by Parliament. Charles’ refusal to compromise was supported by the division that had emerged within Parliament on how to fight the civil war between the Political Presbyterians and Political Independents. The main factors of the failure to reach a settlement were religion, politics, Charles’ intransigence, the New Model Army and the emergence of radical ideas; all of which eventually concluded to Charles’ execution.…
- 1416 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
James and Charles were considerably different in their beliefs and attitudes. James was a confident and extravagant king and Charles was ill at ease and lacked confidence.…
- 611 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
From start of this period, right through to the end, James constantly faced difficulties with parliament. These difficulties weren’t simply limited to his determination to seek a union with Scotland, there were far more issues and instances which caused difficulties with parliament such as clashes between royal prerogative and parliamentary privilege, finance and how James raised money.…
- 741 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A move that created further division between the court and the country, as the infamous figure that could make structural changes in the country, due to his relations with the King. A consequence that demonstrates narcissistic behaviour to ensure that he succeeds with his agenda. It is arguably thought that his agenda was to have full control over England and Scotland. Charles–more so than his father–acted on the “evil” advice of George and dismissed members of court. For example, “Lord Keeper Williams, who James protected”, a ‘known enemy of George’, dismissed by Charles as George was able to convince him to do so.…
- 957 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the later portion of the 1600’s, the monarchial systems of both England and France were changing. England strayed away from an absolute monarch and ran toward a mightier parliament instead. The opposite was occurring in France as Louis XIV strengthened his own office while weakening the general assembly of France, the Estates General. Absolutism, the political situation in which a monarch controls makes all political, social, economic, and cultural decisions in a government without checks or balances, had been introduced by Charles I and James I. However, it never took hold. In France, Louis XIV took absolutism to extremes, claiming to be a servant of God. A limited monarch, England’s monarchial system, is a government in which a monarch…
- 949 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
James I's belief in "divine right" of kings, which meant God had chosen him to be ruler, led him not to rely on Parliament. Rather than depend on Parliament, James I and his successor, Charles I looked for other ways to acquire funds such as illegally levying taxes. Parliament was rarely called on during this period. In response to Charles illegal taxation, Parliament passed the Petition of Right which stated that, to pass any law the ruler must consent to Parliament. In order to continue ruling without Parliament, Charles used Ship Money to collect taxes as revenue. He might have been able to rule indefinitely without Parliament if not for his religious policies which provoked war with Scotland and forced Charles to call Parliament into session. This session, known as the Long Parliament was determined to limit the power of the king. It resolved that Parliament would meet at least every three years. Parliament later split with Charles I and declared war on him. Both James I and Charles I fought to suppress Parliament during their reigns and claimed absolute power due to the "divine right" of kings.…
- 642 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Absolutism created a time of prosperity throughout the 1500s and the 1600s. At this point of history, absolutism was an efficient way of running a government. Absolutist leaders were vigorous, assertive and a potent symbol of authority. The amount of industrial growth in countries such as Russia was both efficient and effective because the power of authority was concentrated into one person’s hands. Absolutism enabled Peter the Great to modernize and adapt Russia for war, commerce and industrial growth. Additionally, absolutism gave people a powerful leader they needed to trust in and depend on for their country's sake. This type of regnant is most evident King James I of England and King Louis XIV of France. For example, King James…
- 257 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Experience of France and England in the 17th century demonstrates the intellectual and practical superiority of absolutism over constitutionalism. Absolutism in France was much more secure than Constitutionalism in England. Absolutism controlled all competing interest groups and organized all religious sects. Louis XIV had centralized power and control under his authority in France while Constitutionalism in England failed to create absolute monarchy. Constitutionalism in England dealt with James I, Charles I, and James II that led to a catastrophe.…
- 718 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
What is an absolute monarchy ? An absolute monarchy is a form of government in which a ruler has absolute , unrestricted power over his people .The absolute monarch of a country is head of state and government , they are not limited by any kind of constitution or law . Absolutism is mostly passed by heredity but there are some few exceptions. During the 1500 and 1600s western europe was pretty much completely ruled by different absolute monarchs .these monarchs could chose the style of their rule , whether they wanted to be a ruler of respect and trust or fear and anguish . the 16th and 17th century in europe proved to be a time of prosperity even through the absolutism ,shown by Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan ,Bishop Jacques and the acts…
- 975 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The English Civil War began in 1642 between King Charles I and Parliament. Wealthy nobles, known as Royalists, supported the king. Supporters of Parliament included Puritans, who were led by Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell eventually became commander-in-chief of Parliament’s army. A number of battles took place between the king’s troops and Cromwell’s army, some of which are shown on the map below. The first battle, which took place at Edgehill, did not gain ground for either side. After a series of victories, however, Cromwell and Parliament took control of London and, eventually, England. In 1649 Charles I was publicly beheaded, and Parliament alone ruled England.…
- 321 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Absolutism has a great power that monarch, monarchy is the type of country that tends to be reported to the awe and respect.…
- 240 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Ending the Elizabethan era of England, James I, the first Stuart monarch, ascended to the throne but didn’t plan on using the theoretical model England sought. Believing in divine right, he ruled with little discussion with his court, which was full of scandal and control, and developed new levies called impositions to gain income. He brought the Anglican episcopacy under his control, hence his saying “No…
- 717 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Absolutism, “the political practice of unlimited power and absolute sovereignty, especially as held by a monarch,” was a prominent form of government in Europe until the eighteenth century. Monarchs believed that they alone held the “divine right to rule,” and there were no checks and balances on their authority. Leaders felt as though they were justified in ruling in any way that they wanted, even if it caused harm to their people. France and Spain both had absolutist monarchies for significant amounts of time, the Bourbon house in France and the Hapsburg dynasty in Spain. The most strongly absolutist rulers of those families were King Louis XIV in France and King Philip II in Spain.…
- 1260 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In 1678, a rumor spread through England that Roman Catholics were plotting to kill King Charles II and give the throne to Charles' brother, James, Duke of York (who was a Roman Catholic). There was no real Popish plot, but an alarmed Parliament barred all Roman Catholics from public office and tried to take away the Duke of York's right to inherit the throne. But to King Charles II, Parliament seemed to be challenging royal authority, and he struck back by dissolving Parliament.…
- 245 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays