Preview

Knowledge Based Theory of the Firm

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3961 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Knowledge Based Theory of the Firm
Knowledge Based Theory of the Firm by R.M. Grant

Assumptions * Firms apply knowledge to the production of good and services * Knowledge is the most strategically important of a firm 's resources * Knowledge is created and held by individuals, not organizations * Firms exist because markets are incapable of coordinating the knowledge of individual specialists. This is the role of the management within a firm.

Coordination of Specialized Knowledge
While organizational theory has spent much time focused on the difficulties of achievingcooperation due to the differing goals of organizational members or the divergence of employee and owner goals, Grant proposes that even with cooperation, coordination ofspecialized knowledge is quite difficult. The past focus on cooperation resulted in an emphasis on hierarchical and authority relations where cooperation is imposed by bureaucracy.
Specialized knowledge can be coordinated using the following mechanisms 1. Rules and directives - these include etiquette, social norms, and procedures 2. Sequencing - each specialist 's input occurs independently in own time slot 3. Routines - also called coordination by mutual adjustment - can support a high level of simultaneity of individuals performing their own specialized tasks 4. Group problem solving and decision making - unlike 1-3 which seek efficiency through minimizing communication, tasks high in complexity and uncertainty require more personal contact and communication.

Importance of Common Knowledge
While the above mechanisms are ways to coordinate the specialized knowledge of employees, coordination also depends on there being common knowledge among organizational members.
Types of common knowledge include: * Language and other forms of symbolic communication - literacy, numeracy, software, statistics * Commonality of specialized knowledge - this is paradoxical but the more specialized knowledge two people have in common,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    LDR 531 Week 3 Quiz

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages

    2 When ________ is of importance in decision making, group decisions are preferred to individual decisions.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BUSI 610 Group DB Forum 1

    • 2057 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Shared information is important for the success of any type of organization in today’s dynamic and volatile environment. Furthermore, when comparing the organizational styles discussed, in a learning organization the sharing of information would promote lateral communications enhancing teamwork among departments. Consequently, the organization would be able to adapt its core competencies through flexibility in support of a positive market position. On the other hand, although an organization that focuses on performance and classical approaches to organizational design might find issues when attempting to manage information as effectively as a learning organization as its efforts may be hindered by its own structural approach.…

    • 2057 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 3 Skills Lab

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    C. One problem with working in groups is coming to an agreement on how a project will be accomplished. When multiple people all have different ideas on how to do a project it is difficult to decide what ideas are not worth doing or which idea is the best out of them all.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PETER DRUCKER

    • 2213 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The organizations that use knowledge work effectively empower and trust their people to have the freedom to share their ideas. Executives and managers work together to align people’s ideas to the mission; as well as create a sense of belonging to each that works there. Management is always about the people first. A manager needs to create an environment where people are comfortable working together and in tandem, and resist the urge to create individual silos. Everyone wants to do great things for their organization; it is up to management to foster that environment of collaboration and teamwork and align the team to the company’s mission and goals.…

    • 2213 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Turman, P. (October 13, 2000b). Group Decision Making & Problem Solving: Group Communication [Lecture] Cedar Falls, IA. University of Northern Iowa, Communication Studies Department.…

    • 4626 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The organization model is the most effective technique when it comes to sharing important knowledge. According to Lombardi and Schermerhorn,…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Articulate the differences between individual and group decision making and problem solving behaviour, and apply appropriate decision making and implementation skills;…

    • 2617 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smith P. (2005) Collaborating to Compete: Achieving Effective Knowledge Sharing in Organisations, The Learning Organisation 12(6) Page 563…

    • 3088 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Schools as Organisations

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages

    *Can co-ordinate areas of expertise so that those with different skills can join forces to enhance individual practice.…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Learning organizations promote a collaborative work environment by encouraging communication among employees regardless of the employee’s level or specialization in the organization. Sharing of information is accomplished through collaborative interaction between employees. Information sharing between teams or departments is essential because this collaboration leads to the identification and resolution of uncertainties, inconsistencies, and conflict within the organizations (Schwartz, 1999). Without sufficient meaningful communication between employees, learning organizations are unable to thrive. In a learning organization, communication is thus the building block for all business operations, company innovation, and future growth.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Communication

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Communication is the key to success in everything we do, it can verbal or nonverbal. Communication is very important in small groups; it forms the group, and maintains them. In my workplace the staff is consisted of nine personnel, so effective communication is important. Our staff would be considered an assigned group simply because the Department of the Army hand picked each individual and assigned them to the university. In addition, within our assigned group, there is a task-oriented group, which performs certain tasks that assign to the group to complete. In chapter, nine assigned groups evolve out of a hierarchy where individuals are appointed as members of the group. In addition, task-oriented groups are formed for the purpose of completing tasks such as solving a problem or making a decision. ( Pearson, Nelson, Titsworth, and Harter, 2003).…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Groups have four basic characteristics, including: 1) being comprised of at least two people; 2) having structural stability; 3) possessing a common goal or interest; and 4) having group member perceptions of belonging within the group. Together, the members interact through verbal, (i.e., talking, listening, providing feedback), and non-verbal, (i.e., body language and gestures), communication. Occurring across various mediums, (i.e., in person within the same physical space, electronically by phone and computer, and via mail), group member communication attempts to influence one another in achievement of the group mission or goal. It is important to note that…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Purpose – This paper aims to argue that the principal components of the Resource-Based View (RBV) as a theory of sustained competitive advantage are not a sufficient basis for a complete and consistent theory of firm behaviour. Two missing elements are value theory and accountability mechanisms. Design/methodology/approach – The paper proposes a link between value theory and accountability using a Resource Value-Resource Risk perspective as an alternative to the Capital Asset Pricing Model. The link operates first from the labour process, where value is created but is imperfectly observable by intra-firm mechanisms of organizational control and outside governance arrangements without incurring monitoring costs. Second, it operates through contractual arrangements which impose fixed cost structures on activities with variable revenues. Findings – The paper thereby explains how value originates in risky and difficult to monitor productive processes and is transmitted as rents to organizational and capital market constituents. It then reviews recent contributions to the RBV, arguing that the proposed new approach overcomes gaps inherent in the alternatives, and thus offers a more complete and integrated view of firm behaviour. Originality/value – The RBV can become a coherent theory of firm behaviour, if it adopts and can integrate the labour theory of value, associated measures of risk arising from the labour process and mechanisms of accountability. Keywords Resources, Risk management, Labour, Competitive advantage Paper type Research paper…

    • 12410 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ERP AND MRP

    • 10713 Words
    • 43 Pages

    together. Then it can inform planning and control decisions such as when activities should take place,…

    • 10713 Words
    • 43 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Besides this an individuals’ own capability to share and perceive knowledge is important. Employees agreed that if the person is capable to understand what is being delivered to him, then the knowledge would be successfully shared. They even strongly agreed that level of knowledge sharing is dependent on the capabilities an individual has.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays