Lack Of Identity Politics In The United States

Identity Politics The term “identity politics” has risen to prominence over the years. Nothing is wrong with today’s identity politics. Identity politics is where people of the same social background, race, class, religion, and even sexuality create an elite political alliance to attain power. Individuals with a common identity come together to vote for a specific candidate because that candidate identifies with them. There is nothing wrong with today’s identity politics because people are allowed to vote for candidates who put their rights first. It is essential for a political candidate to focus on the identities of the people, especially the marginalized people instead of the elites. Identity politics is becoming popular in the word today. Even though it is not widely used, candidates who use identity politics tend to win the elections. Recognizing the interests of all people and not using a class to gain a political advantage is the best way to use identity politics. Identity politics is played in America by both the democrats and republicans but in different ways (Vox). Identity politics is used in terms of the white identity as well as the marginalized identity.
The reality is that politics is not a public policy seminar. All people have their identities, including political candidates, and they are politically organized and mobilized around their identities. Therefore, there is no shortcut to politics other than the use of identity politics. Therefore, beyond having the best manifesto for a country or a group of people, one has to have an identity that can allow him/her to secure a significant number of votes from the people. Most citizens do not vote because of a candidate’s campaign policies and proposals; instead, they do vote for a candidate who mobilizes them around noticeable aspects of a group identity. They vote for candidates who deal with issues affecting the marginalized groups (Knauer