After analyzing Lambert v. Barron case, I concur with the court`s decision that there was no contract between Lambert and Barron. It is apparent in this case that the parties to this case are just friends. Before Lambert flew to Louisiana on 11th November 1998, indeed the two had conversed and Lambert even showed concern for his friend`s situation. Actually, this occurs with allies. Furthermore, at no time during or prior to the trip did Lambert and Barron discuss concerning compensation for the advice. It is imperative to note for a legal and binding contract to be formed, there must be an offer by the offeror, and acceptance by the offeree (Mallor, 2016, p.325). Nonetheless, the discussion pertaining to past consulting
After analyzing Lambert v. Barron case, I concur with the court`s decision that there was no contract between Lambert and Barron. It is apparent in this case that the parties to this case are just friends. Before Lambert flew to Louisiana on 11th November 1998, indeed the two had conversed and Lambert even showed concern for his friend`s situation. Actually, this occurs with allies. Furthermore, at no time during or prior to the trip did Lambert and Barron discuss concerning compensation for the advice. It is imperative to note for a legal and binding contract to be formed, there must be an offer by the offeror, and acceptance by the offeree (Mallor, 2016, p.325). Nonetheless, the discussion pertaining to past consulting