This case is about operators of a business and the owners of the strip mall where business was located. The action alleged that the business was a front for prostitution and an illegal massage parlor. A preliminary injunction was issued by trial of court restricting the operation of a massage parlor or a place of prostitution. Pacific Landmark, a restricted liability company and owner of the property and Ron Mavaddat, the Pacific's manager appeal, challenging that the preliminary injunction is disputable in light of the fact that the culpable business has cleared the premises, with the outcome there is no risk of future impairment. Mavaddat likewise opposes, as manager of Pacific,…
In July of 2000 Curtis Williams was indicted by a grand jury in Williamson County, Texas for aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury. While under indictment, Williams traveled to Louisiana from Texas on a Greyhound bus. The bus Williams was traveling on was scheduled to make a stop at the Shreveport Greyhound Bus terminal on September 12,…
U.S. 261 (1990) was a United States Supreme Court case argued on December 6, 1989 and decided on June 25, 1990. In a 5-4 court decision, the court found in favor of the Missouri Dept. of Health. The court affirmed the ruling of the Supreme Court of Missouri. However, it upheld the legal standard that competent persons are able to exercise the right to refuse medical treatment under the Due Process Clause and its implied right to privacy. Because there was no “clear and convincing evidence” of what Nancy Cruzan wanted, the court upheld the state’s policy.…
The Tarasoff Case is based on the 1969 murder of a University of California Berkley student, Tatiana Tarasoff. The perpetrator, Prosenjit Poddar was a student at the University who had met Tarasoff at a folk dancing class on campus. While they went on several dates, they soon disagreed on the seriousness of their relationship and Poddar became obsessed with her. When Tatiana rebuffed him, Poddar began stalking her and underwent an emotional crisis for which he began psychological counseling at the university medical center. (Vitelli 1)…
The Tarasoff case is the case that “established a clinician’s duty to warn” (Mottarella, n.d.). Prosenjit Poddar, a student at University of California Berkeley (UCAL) was a patient of Dr. Lawrence Moore, a psychologist a hospital affiliated with UCAL. Poddar was seeking treatment for an emotional breakdown after being romantically rejected by Tatiana Tarasoff. In the course of therapy Poddar related to Dr. Moore his intent to kill Tarasoff that fall. Dr. Moore conferred with his superiors at the facility and the determination, customary at that time, was made to have Poddar involuntarily committed. Dr. Moore notified the campus police and requested that Poddar be picked up, warning that Poddar can appear quite rational at times. Campus…
Of the cases I viewed, Jacob Ind’s case really caught my attention. In this paper, I will be covering the backstory to Jacob’s life, the results of his actions, and my take on his sentencing.…
1. By the mid-1850s, sectional conflict over the extension of slavery into the Western territories threatened to tear the nation apart.With Congress sharply divided, reflecting the divisions in the nation, the Supreme Court took the unusual step of hearing the case of a fugitive slave suing for his freedom. Intended to be the definitive ruling that would settle the controversy threatening the Union for good, the case instead produced a divisive decision that pushed the nation one step closer toward the precipice of civil war. John Marshall, in his time the single most influential advocate for strong National Government, had died in 1835. President Andrew Jackson appointed Roger B. Taney (pronounced Tawney). During his tenure as Chief Justice, Taney upheld strong national power, but with some modifications. Taney endorsed what is known as “dual sovereignty,” which implies that State and federal governments are “foreign” to each other; each is sovereign in its own right. By 1857, Taney presided over a Court that had expanded to nine justices and was divided—four Northerners and five Southerners, including Taney, sat on the bench.…
Caylee Marie Anthony was a two year old girl who was reported missing in Orlando, Florida on July, 2008. On December 2008 her body was found in a wooded area near her home. Caylee Anthony was missing for over 31 days, and was reported missing to the cops by her grandmother Cindy Anthony, Caylee’s mother Casey Anthony was arrested under first degree murder for the murder of her daughter. Cindy Anthony said that Casey’s car smelled like a dead body had been inside. Cindy also said that Casey had given her all different types of explanations as to where her granddaughter was, one day Casey could not keep her secret from her mother as to the whereabouts of her daughter Caylee, and told her mother that she had not seen her daughter for week. Casey lied to her mother and to the police about Caylee’s whereabouts by giving various types of stories. She told the detectives that Caylee was kidnapped by her babysitter, Zenaida Gonzalez, and that the reason that Casey had not reported to the cops was because she wanted to scare Zenaida. The police later on find out that Casey made everything up that the so called babysitter Zenaida Gonzalez didn’t exist. This lady lived in another state and had never met anyone with the name of Casey Anthony. Police also found out that Casey lied about her employment at Universal Studios in Orlando Florida. On October 2011, Casey Anthony was charge with first degree murder and pled not guilty. In December 2011, Caylee’s body was found inside of a trash bag with duct tape near the front of her skill and mouth. Because of the evidence the duct tape on Caylee’s mouth, examiners determined that Caylee was murdered. Casey Anthony’s trial lasted about a month and a half. The prosecution said that Casey murdered her daughter by putting chloroform (a substance that puts someone to sleep, but if too much used it can cause death.) However Case’s…
armbands was a silent form of expression and that students do not have to give…
Abraham Lincoln once said, “Don’t interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties” (Shmoop.com). On September 17th, 1787 the signing of Constitution of the United States of America took place. The members of the Constitutional Convention met to create a strong, centralized government after the dissatisfaction of the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution created a government made by the people, for the people, which includes minors. Every American citizen has undeniable rights that are provided in the Constitution and that should also protect minors while they are at school and at home, where they should be able to express themselves without punishment as well.…
The court’s Ruling was actually somewhat mixed. The court ruled that Marbury did have right to the commissions because the order would go into effect when Adams signed the papers. This was so because he was still in power when he signed them. The also ruled that Congress did not have the power to expand the original jurisdiction of Supreme Court beyond that which is specified in Article III of the Constitution. Their reasoning behind this was that the Constitution states “the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors,…
The urgency of these demands is seen in the six cases Ms. Pfeiffer presented. There is only one mutilated survivor of the six, and all of the five deceased have left behind harrowing tales of wretchedness leading up to their deaths. These tales are located in public institutions, facilitated by public policies, to the full knowledge of public officials serving to carry out modern public policy. There is no throwback period of…
| At the age of 3, Irving Independent School District agreed to provide Amber with a special education program starting with an early childhood program. In Amber's special education program, Irving Independent School District agreed to provide her with services such as physical therapy and occupational therapy but did not agree to provide her with someone trained in CIC. Issue was whether or not this was a related service?…
CPIC Editors. (2012). The Case of Aileen Wuornos. Capital Punishment in Context. Retrieved March 27, 2013, from http://www.capitalpunishmentincontext.org/node/77454…
Ninderjit Singh, a man who executed his ex-girlfriend in 1999, asked the judge for leniency last week in B.C. Supreme Court (Burgmann, 2013). Singh has been hidden in U.S. for 14 years, and he was 21 years old back then. He fled the same day to California, where he grew a bushy beard, gained weight and lived under an alias until police hunted him down in August 2011, just before he was to apparently get an operation to alter his fingerprints (Burgmann, 2013). Not only that, Singh’s family did not feel shame of what he did to a innocent girl, but also “the family of killer Ninderjit Singh gave him $150,000 for false ID, raised cash for surgery to change his fingerprints and lied to police about his whereabouts for more than 12 years” (Bolan, 2013, para. 1). His family is definitely not using a right judgment and method to deal with the case. They only considered how to protect their son from getting hurt by the law, but forgot to think about the mistake Singh made to ruin the other family and the girl’s entire future. This case can be applied by the power control theory because Singh had a low self- control and broken the social bonds that caused him to have criminal behavior.…