Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Special Education Major Court Cases

Satisfactory Essays
1230 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Special Education Major Court Cases
| Student | The Problem | The Ruling | The Bottom Line | Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District vs. Rowley (1982) | Amy Rowley, first grade student with hearing impairment | Amy was an adequate lip reader. School provided speech and language services, services of a teacher of the deaf, and amplification systemParents wanted sign language interpreter; school denied | Rowleys invoked due process; hearing officer ruled in favor of the school, district court and Circuit Court sided with parents; Supreme Court sided with school | Ruled that schools did not have to “maximize the potential” but rather provide opportunities for “educational benefit”. | Irving Independent School District v. Tatro (1980) | Amber Tatro was born with spina bifida and required clean intermittent catherization, CIC | At the age of 3, Irving Independent School District agreed to provide Amber with a special education program starting with an early childhood program. In Amber's special education program, Irving Independent School District agreed to provide her with services such as physical therapy and occupational therapy but did not agree to provide her with someone trained in CIC. Issue was whether or not this was a related service? | District court ruled with schools – they did not have to provide this. Circuit court ruled with family - The Court of Appeals stated that CIC is a related service because Amber could not attend any classes and thus receive any education without this service. | Public schools must provide services that are necessary despite the severity of the physical needs. Schools are responsible for the medical needs of students as long as a licensed physician is not required. | Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F. (1993?) | Garrett F., four year old, paralyzed in a motorcycle accident | Although Garret is ventilator - dependent and requires a responsible person to attend to his physical needs, his success in school academics was a great successWhile Garret was in kindergarten and primary school, a combination of family members and personnel paid for by insurance and accident settlements provided this necessary support. Approximately four years after the accident (1993), insurance and settlement funds were diminished. Garret's mother proceeded to request that the school district pay for medical services needed during the school day.School denied request and stated they had no obligation to provide a one-on-one staff member to assist Garrett. | The Judge explained that any student with a disability that adversely affects their academic performance must be provided with special education services and any related services by law, so school was responsible.School appealed; said services were medical services and not related servicesSupreme Court found that the individuals caring for Garret did not need any extra training and did not need to seek licensure. | Public schools must provide services that are necessary despite the severity of the physical needs. Schools are responsible for the medical needs of students as long as a licensed physician is not required. | Doe vs. Withers (1993) | Michael Withers, general education teacher | Refused to comply with IEP accommodation to have tests read aloud to a student (named as Doe to protect family) with a learning disability | Found that he deliberately ignored IEP and was fined to pay $15,000 after student failed. | Teachers are responsible for implementation of the IEP. It is a legal document. | Roncker v. Walter, (1993) | Neil Roncker, a nine year old child with moderate mental retardation | IEP placed him in separate school for children with disabilitiesNeil’s parents invoked due process, claimed district violated FAPE an LRE because their son was not being educated with nondisabled peers. | US District Court supported school district.Sixth Circuit Court overturned lower court, and sided with parents; ruled that school district had not integrated Neil to the maximum extent appropriateDeveloped two part Roncker portability test:
1) What is it in the segregated program that makes it better than a mainstreaming program?

2) Can these things (modified curriculum, teacher) be provided in the regular school environment? | Placement decisions must be individually made and cannot be a automatically placed based solely on the basis of their disability (e.g., mentally retardation).Students should not be placed in a separate setting if services can be provided in the regular education setting. | Daniel R. R. v. State Board of Education | Involved Daniel, a six year old student with Down Syndrome from Texas. | He was placed half day in regular pre –K and half day in early childhood special education classroom.Regular education teacher said he was not making progress. IEP team pulled him out of regular education program, but allowed him to attend lunch and recess with general education students.Daniel’s parent appealed claiming that he was not being educated with general education students. | Fifth Circuit sided with school – stated that educators should make instructional and placement decisions. Found that the school had correctly identified Daniel’s LRE.Developed two part test:1.Can an appropriate education in the general education classroom with the use of supplementary aids and services be achieved satisfactorily? 2. If a student is placed in a more restrictive setting, is the student “integrated” to the “maximum extent appropriate”? | Students with disabilities must be included with students without disabilities as much as possible. | Sacramento City Unified School District Board of Education vs. Rachel Holland (1994) | Rachel Holland, 11 year old girl with moderate mental retardation | She attended special education classes from the start of her academic career, but her parents wanted her mainstreamed.School offered to put her in nonacademic courses, lunch, and recess but maintain her academic courses in a separate special education classroom.Parents wanted her to spend all day in regular general education classroom. They invoked due process rights, requested hearing, and unilaterally placed her in a private school. | Hearing officer found for the parents, district court found for the parents and applied four prong test:1. Is the more restrictive setting significantly more beneficial than the general education setting with supplemental aids and services?2. Are social needs with students in general education being met to the maximum extent?3. Does the presence of the student with a disability adversely impact the regular education teacher or class?4. Is the placement in the regular education classroom exceedingly expensive? | Stated the importance of social benefits for students with disabilities when included with students without disabilities.Indicated that that the presence of a student with a disability in a general education setting should not adversely impact the education of other students. | Hartmann v. Loudoun County Board of Education (1998) | Mark Hartmann, 11 year old child with autism | School provided Mark with a full time aide, three hours a week of special education, five hours per week of speech, individualized training for teacher and aide, training for entire staffMark continued to have problems in the general education setting. He was aggressive, dangerous, and highly disruptive. He did not make progress towards his IEP goals.School recommended placing Mark in a specialized program for students with autism. Parents upset he is not mainstreamed. | District Court found in favor with parents, Circuit Court overturned the lower courts ruled. Court applied following criteria in determining the general education setting is not appropriate:1. regular education courses will not provide educational benefit2. a more restrictive placement significantly outweighs the benefits of mainstreaming3. Due to disruptive behavior, the child compromises the education of other students in the classroom | Social benefits of mainstreaming are secondary in importance to academic needs. |

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: In Santa Fe, Texas, students were elected by their classmates to give pre-game prayers at high school football games over the loud speaker that were mainly Christian. A Catholic and a Mormon family felt this was a violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution. The school district has always done pre-game invocations before each game however while the case was pending the school district changed their policy, still permitting student led prayer but not requiring them as they were before. The District Court ordered that only nonsectarian and nonproselytizing prayers could be…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The court found that the banning of a silent expression of opinion was unconstitutional. The students did not disrupt or intruded on the schools affairs. Furthermore, the court did not express any opinion for the form of relief for the plaintiff. They decided to reverse the ruling and send it back to the lower court for nominal damage ruling.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case established limitations on our 4th amendment right under school property. The majority opinion should be right one because in order to…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason why judges voted YES is because they say that Childrens are not necessarly guaranteed the full extent of the First Amendment. They add that the students did not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the school.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I was graduated from the New Jersey School for the Deaf in June 2012. The New Jersey School for the Deaf had legal to allow the students can graduate by the between 18 and 21 years old. Some of students had made their decision that they need to extend learning in education until 21 years old. In this reason, they were not ready to become an independent and unfulfilled, what do they want from this school. Furthermore, the ethnicities of students were Latino-American, Indian, Chinese, African-American and Hispanic in the New Jersey School for the Deaf, in fact, the many Latino students are coming from Puerto Rico and Dominican Republic. These students are amazing and respect each other in New Jersey School for the Deaf. In contract, I also…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Goss V Lopez Brief

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Public school students from Columbus, Ohio brought this suit. They claimed that their constitutional right to due process was violated. The students were suspended without hearing prior to their suspension. They were suspended for destroying school property but principals can only suspend up to 10 days or expel them. If suspended they must notify parents without 24 hours and give the reasons. Students may appeal to the board of education.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After continuous back and forth battling of the plaintiffs/plaintiffs’ claims the U.S. district court ruled in favor of the school board. However, the plaintiff was not happy about the outcome, and set out for an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Thurgood Marshall became imperative in his position for blacks in the school system because blacks, and whites were unequal. The school segregation violated the “equal protection clause” of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The outcome of cases that have gone through the United States Supreme Court judicial branch have each had a major impact on how the laws and amendments of the United States Constitution are interpreted. Two cases in particular that expanded constitutional liberties is the case of Engel vs. Vitale (1962) and the case of Tinker vs. Des Moines School District (1969). Not only did both of these cases expand constitutional liberties in general, they more specifically, expanded rights within the school system.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Oyez Project, Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 551 U.S. 701 (2007) available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2006/2006_05_908) (last visited Thursday, October 28, 2010).…

    • 2471 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it acknowledged some of the plaintiffs’/plaintiffs’ claims, a three-judge panel at the U.S. District Court that heard the cases ruled in favor of the school boards. The plaintiffs then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine you are a seven year old and have to walk one mile to a bus stop by walking through a railroad switching station and then waiting for a school bus to go to a "black elementary school" or a school where only African American children went. This is what happened to Linda Brown, an African American third grader from Topeka, Kansas, even though there was a "white elementary school" only seven blocks away. A "white elementary school" was a school where only white students were able to attend. This research paper will base on the case of Brown vs. Board of Education.…

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Supreme Court Major Cases

    • 4278 Words
    • 18 Pages

    The court’s Ruling was actually somewhat mixed. The court ruled that Marbury did have right to the commissions because the order would go into effect when Adams signed the papers. This was so because he was still in power when he signed them. The also ruled that Congress did not have the power to expand the original jurisdiction of Supreme Court beyond that which is specified in Article III of the Constitution. Their reasoning behind this was that the Constitution states “the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors,…

    • 4278 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mathew Fraser Speech

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The US Supreme Court voted 7-2, saying that the school district's policy did not violate the First Amendment.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lynne: The service delivery we provide is direct service within a general education setting, which is where we give direct service within the general education classroom, direct support for individual students by a regular classroom teacher, special education teacher or an assistant within the classroom. We also have individual or small group settings that give instructions to meet the educational needs and the behavioral needs of the student. We also provide direct service outside of a…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The student and parent were asked a series of questions about her experience at school and her current living and social situation. I will identify the student in my summary as “Cecelia” and the parent as the mother of the students. Cecelia suffers from partial hearing loss and several limited social skills. Cecelia’s mother stated that her placement in the program was determined by an IQ test that she received as a child. Cecelia was asked how she enjoyed her placement in the special education program in high school. She stated that the teachers and students were very nice. Cecelia mother added that she had been in the special education program for as long as she had been in school due to her hearing loss and inability to effectively socialize with others.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays