Preview

Lao Tzu Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
725 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lao Tzu Analysis
Advantage and Disadvantage of Lao Tzu’s Opinion

Lao Tsu, a Chinese author named Li Erh , was known for his writing “Tao te Ching.” In Lao Tzu’s “Tao-te Ching” he says “ nonsense makes perfect sense” (214) He states that leaders should practice non doing concept to govern their counties, and ambition and desire will cause unstable life. Also, he mentions that leaders only use weapons for utmost restraint. His philosophy displays the ways which people can not note, makes meaningful senses. However, a lot of people criticize that it is incredible to be no change because changes are the opportunities to improve. Although Lao Tsu indicates that the best leader should use a practicing no doing concept, emptying people’s desire
…show more content…
“ The more weapons you have, the less secure people will be.” Lao Tzu says. (209). A genuine leader should avoid to use it because his people will fear of him. In additions, he mentions when a leader rejoices in victory by using military force, his happiness is establish on the harm of the people who were defeated from another country. Consequently, the best leader who should use the genuineness to govern the country and avoid use military to intrude other countries except to protect the country. In Contrast, if leaders lacks weapon to strong their military, they were be despised. A Leader who have strong military can be confident while he is meeting other …show more content…
Lao Tzu says “ Practice not doing, and everything fall into place.” (206). The universe is forever out of control. When some things were changed, it will cause the opposite, so the best way to govern countries is practice not doing. Also, He indicates that a leader let go of the law, the economics, the religion, and all desire, people will become honest, prosperous, and serene (57). In other words, if leaders try not to control, people will live without stressful. Therefore, the country can live longer. on the other hand, trying not control make leaders less power and are despised. A leader should make change for the country to get stronger to avoid other countries’

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Summary: The writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu indicate that they would disagree most strongly on the concept of how a government should run. Machiavelli believed that in strong government control by a prince who acted more in terms of practicality and maintaining power than through moral principles. Lao Tzu, on the other hand, took a more individualistic, carefree approach, believing that a ruler will be respected and followed if he does not act powerfully and force rules and issues.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hongwu apply Machiavelli’s teaching by making people to fear him.From the class handout, it said ”Men will quickly offend a beloved person; but fear creates a dread of punishment which never fail.” this quote explained that people can easily betray a beloved leader but not a fearful leader.It also showed us that a king should make people to fear, scared about…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How does a civilization attain the most effective leadership? More importantly what is considered effective leadership and who developed the theories surrounding it? These questions are debated through the ages of postmodern and modern civilization. Bass (1974) wrote that, "from its infancy, the study of history has been the study of leaders" (Wren, 1995, p. 50). Four of the godfathers of what is considered modern leadership theory are Plato, Aristotle, Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli. Over the course of this analysis, the leadership theories of each of these titans will be evaluated. Each view contains commonalities and disparities which offer conflicting perspectives on the complex topic of leadership throughout the ages of modern society. The goal is to broaden these views with critical evaluation, vetted scholarly sources and well-reasoned judgments. The conclusion arrived at will offer heighten awareness at the age old highly debated question; what is effective leadership?…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lao-Tzu vs. Machiavelli

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Lao-tzu’s view is government should not have optimal power over the people He feels as though the less people know they are being governed, the happier they will be. For example, in the Tao-te Ching Lao-tzu states, “If you want to be a great leader,/ you must learn to follow the Tao./ Stop trying to control./Let go of fixed plans and concepts,/ and the world will govern itself.” (Verse 57)…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lao-Tzu vs Machiavelli

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When utilizing the rhetorical strategy of comparing and contrasting in relationship to literature, a number of pieces of can qualify. In particular, the idea of leadership is arguably one of the most written about topics with regard to comparing and contrasting. Throughout history, it can be argued that the majority of successful societies have been based upon effective divisions of leadership. Accordingly, in their pieces of literature, The Tao-te Ching and The Qualities of the Prince, Lao-tzu and Machiavelli have sought to convey a more complete and concrete understanding of their respective definitions and duties of a ruler (leadership). The theme of political leaders and their intricate relationship with society indeed validate itself within both texts. However, both Lao-tzu and Machiavelli approach this issue from almost entirely opposite positions, though sharing minute similarities. Lao-tzu appears to focus the majority of his attention on letting problems or situations take their course, and consequently good would prevail. On the contrary, Machiavelli advocates the necessity for a successful leader, or prince, to take control of his deeds, and the skills or qualities necessary to maintain power. Since both writers propose a question as to what is in essence the same dilemma, effective leadership, it becomes almost natural literary etiquette to contrast the two in an effort to better understand what qualities a prosperous leader must possess. Despite each author’s contrasting approaches to rhetoric, they agree that a ruler should avoid being hated and despised, but disagree in areas such as government involvement in citizens’ everyday lives.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao Tzu - Tao Te Ching

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Tao-Te Ching covers a variety of topics. Ranging from political views to practical advice for the everyday person, it teaches how to be a great ruler, teacher or individual. To be a great leader, you must be in harmony with the people, “If you don’t trust the people, you make them untrustworthy” (verse 17). Passages like this make a person think about how their actions can affect the outcome of events. How a person will be viewed and whether or not they are doing the right thing.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military theory spans centuries of conflict all across the world. As such, military theorists have written in a variety of military climates, varying from the absence of gun powder to the presence of nuclear weapons. However, some military theories are transcendent. Some elements of Sun Tzu and Clausewitz are eternally wise. While their similarities may become universal truths, their differences are equally worthy of study because, it is in the differences where choices are made. Sun Tzu and Clausewitz agreed that war is chaos, military action is a tool for diplomatic goals and, as such, the results of warfare are not final. Their differences lie in how they advocate for waging war. The style and preparations for war contrast. This is where…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He elaborates on the fact that the best leader is not even known to exist. “When (the master’s) work is done, the people will say, “Amazing : we did it, all by ourselves””, according to Lao. He is trying to restate and exaggerate the, quite possibly most important, point in his writing. He states that “the master doesn't talk, he acts”, showing that he is not only a leader for the positive relationship he has with the people, but also for doing the things that need to be done. Despite this fact, this “best type” of leader doesn't take the credit for what could be argued is his success. He does this because of the trusting bond and positive relationship he holds with his people, allowing them the success, but also maintaining his role in leadership by not even hinting at the true depth of his rule. And it is because of this that I agree with Lao-tzu; anyone this selfless and pure of intent deserves to rule over a trustworthy people, just as much as the people of any place deserve a leader of this…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Laotzu

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lao-tzu or "Old Master," the author of the Tao-te-Ching wrote not only about the moral behavior one should live their life by, but also about the ways to create a functional government. Lao-tzu wrote mainly for politicians as a guide to follow in order for them to become good leaders. Lao-tzu informs his readers that one can only help people by allowing them to help themselves. One powerful statement from the Tao-te-Ching is, "When they think that they know the answers, / people are difficult to guide." This statement is not only applicable for followers of the Tao-te-Ching, but it can also apply for people of today as well. There are many examples of the previous Lao-tzu quote that apply to today. A perfect example of people being difficult to guide when they feel they know the answers would be teenagers rebelling against their parents. Teens feel this way because they feel they know as much as their parents if not more which causes this rebellious side. Another good example I have found that relates to Lao-tzu would be students who feel they do not need to have respect for their teachers.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taoism originated in China around 500 b.c Taoist thought is based on the writings of Lao-Tzu in the poetic stanzas of the Tao Te Ching. Lau Tzu translates as the 'Old Man ' or the 'Old Teacher '. It is 5,000 characters in length and comprises of two books. The Tao Te Ching is the second most printed book in the world next to the Bible. The Tao Te Ching represents Philosophical Taoism at its purest as it was to develop through the centuries into a more institutionalised religion and into branches of mysticism that sought to endlessly increase the lifespan of its followers. Taoism arose concurrently in China with the religion of Confucianism with its adherence to a rigid hierarchy and strictly imposed civic codes. In contrast Taoism did not interest itself in…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Life is a series of natural and spontaneous changes. Don't resist them - that only creates sorrow. Let reality be reality. Let things flow naturally forward in whatever way they like.” (Lao Tzu Quote." BrainyQuote. Xplore, n.d. Web. 03 Sept. 2016.) Lao Tzu is letting us know that life is eccentric that there are numerous progressions out there and that we ought to acknowledge them and live peacefully with it. Living in a universe of oblivious euphoria sounds less demanding, in spite of the fact that the penance of not knowing the truth is too high. The cruelty of reality might be hard to manage however in the meantime it can also be magnificent and wonderful.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Examples are given in the article: – Love the country; do it no harm. – Serve the people; do no disservice. – Follow science; discard ignorance. – Be diligent; not indolent. – Be united, help each other; make no gains at others expense. – Be honest and trustworthy; do not give up morals for profits. – Be disciplined and law-abiding; not chaotic and lawless. – Live plainly, struggle hard; do not wallow in luxuries and pleasures.However, there are some idea that contradict to Confucianism. Confucianism’s ideal way to govern people is by benevolent. Modern China supports the idea of A harmonious society is a society governed by…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Confucius believed that the nature of human beings is good, but they want the best. Men want riches and honors and the leaders want to be followed faithfully. For this to happen though people must be good, there must be reward for being good, and the people must have confidence in themselves. This is achieved though the government. Confucius said; “In doing government,...If you desire good, the people will be good. The nature of Superior Man is like the wind, the nature of the inferior man is like the grass. When the wind blows over the grass, it always blends.”(Confucius). Han Fei believes that “Hardly ten men of true integrity and good faith can be found today” (Han Fei). Even though there are hundreds of men running offices and governments, they’re there to enforce that laws are firm instead of relying that people will be of good faith.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Yin and Yang are immortals they have a love/ have relationship each person has yin and yang…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chinese Philosophy Essay

    • 1421 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Three areas of philosophy emerged amidst the chaos and constant warring of the Zhou era. The three were called Confucianism, Daoism, and legalism. They were Chinese philosophies that were thought to be the best ways to rule and achieve order in the society. Confucianism believed that a ruler 's job was to set a good example, and not order. Since people were thought of as naturally good, they would following the right path based on their own conscience. Legalism was a more harsh way of ruling, led by Hanfeizi. They thought people were evil, and needed strict laws and punishment to keep them in line. Daoism was very different from either of the other two. It was led by Laozi, who taught that the best kind of government was one who governed the least. They allowed things to simply take their natural course and work themselves out. Although both Daoism and legalism were working philosophies, Confucianism was the most effective in obtaining order.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays