Preview

Le Barron V State Brief

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
622 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Le Barron V State Brief
Le Barron v. State
145 N.W. 2d 79 (Wis. 1966)
History
David Le Barron was sentenced to 15 years in prison for attempted rape. He appealed and the Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed the conviction.
Facts
Jodean Randen, a housewife, wass walking home when she crossed paths with the Le Barron. He grabbed her and demanded her purse. She gave him the purse and started quickly walking away.
When he discovered the purse was empty, he went after her, grabbed her, and told her not to scream. He then led her to the end of the bridge; she went willingly, fearing harm. As they approached the coal shack at the end of the bridge, he warned her not to do anything or he’d kill her. At this time, Ms. Randen thought le Barron had a knife.
Inside the shack, Le Barron unzipped his pants and started pulling up the victim’s skirt and said “You know what else I want”. She was finally able to get his hand off of her mouth and told him that she was pregnant. Le Barron realized that she was, in fact, pregnant and left her alone. He warned her that if she screamed or called the police, he would kill her.
Appeal
Le Barron appealed on the grounds that he desisted from the rape before he had the opportunity to form intent, and that the pregnancy, which caused him to desist was intrinsic and not an “extraneous factor” as is outlined in the statute (He had already formed the intent and would commit the crime except for another person’s intervention or another extraneous factor).
Opinion
The court said that it the defendant’s overt acts were sufficient to support the inference that he intended to rape the victim: * He threatened Randen that he would kill her if she refused to cooperate. * He forced her into the shack against her will * His comment, “You know what else I want”, and unzipping his pants and lifting her skirt
The jury had the right to assume he was capable to carry out his threat if the victim resisted.
They concluded that the jury could infer

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When approaching the counter with a .38 revolver in hand, the defendant demanded all of the money from the register. As the other man stood point at the entrance to the store. Mrs. Lazar let out a scream, produced from shear fear for her life. In doing so, Dale Bruckner responded “Shut her up Johnny” which resulted in Mrs. Lazar being brutally shot in the head, dreadfully causing death on impact.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Facts: Judd approached the defendant in an attempt to calm him. The defendant then punched Judd in the face. A brief fight ensured between Judd and the defendant during which a shelf with ceramic mugs fell on the floor and shattered. Doucette, Anderson and Potkaj attempted to break up the fight. Anderson and Potkaj grabbed Judd by his arms to restrain him while Doucette came up behind the defendant and wrapped his arms around him to stop the fight. The defendant broke free from Doucette and attacked Judd again. Judd freed himself from Potkaj and Anderson in response to the defendant’s attack and punched the defendant again. The defendant then picked up a kitchen knife with an eight inch blade from the counter and strode six feet from the counter toward Judd, swinging and stabbing with the knife.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A recent criminal Supreme Court case that I find to be interesting is Missouri v. Frye. Actus reus is a guilty act, mens rea is a guilty mind, and concurrence is the equality of rights. Both actus reus and mens rea are both needed in order for a defendant to prove criminal liability. This case was about a guy named Frye, he was arrested for driving with a revoked license. Frye was previously arrested a few times before this incident dealing with the same crime. Missouri state law can give you a maximum sentence of up to four years when arrested three times for driving on a revoked license. The prosecutor sent Frye's counsel a letter that offered two possible plea bargains. If he was to plea guilty the charge could be reduced to a misdemeanor…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Considering the sensitivity of the case, candidates were warned that they would hear narrations about profane and vulgar sexual acts. District Court Judge Michael Fitzgerald said that the core of Derrick Rose rape case is sexual act so the jury need to prepare hearing sensitive details. The plaintiff already appeared before the jury and was…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri v McNeely

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Missouri police officer stopped Tyler McNeely after observing it exceeding the posted speed limit and repeatedly crossing the center line. The officer noticed McNeely’s bloodshot eyes, his slurred speech, and a smell of alcohol on his breath. McNeely performed poorly on a battery of field sobriety tests, and he declined to take a Breathalyzer test. When McNeely indicated he refuse a breath sample for testing, the officer took him to a nearby hospital for blood alcohol test. The officer explained to McNeely that under Missouri’s implied consent law, refusal to submit voluntarily to the blood test would lead to an immediate one-year suspension of his driver’s license and could be used against him in any future prosecution. The testing of the blood indicated that the blood alcohol level was significantly above the legal limit. McNeely had challenged the blood test evidence claiming that there should have been a search warrant before ordering a blood sample.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question here is whether or not the petitioner, Jose Padilla, will be deported on account that he had plead guilty to a crime but allegedly had his sixth amendment right violated. There are multiply issues here. The first issue here is Padilla plead guilty to a drug offense that took place in the United States. The second issue is he claims his counsel did not inform him about the consequences of his plea bargain and he was misinformed about the possibility of deportation. The third is he states his decision would have been different if his counsel would have been verbally clear about the risk of his plea bargain. The short answer to the question is yes. Yes, Padilla will be deported back to his home country of Honduras.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Marbury V. US

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the last of President Adams term he wanted to ensure Federalist took control of the Judiciary branch so he named forty-two justices of the piece and sixteen circuit court justices for Washington DC. Once the commissions were signed by the President Adams the Secretary of State had the commissions sealed however they were not delivered by the end of President Adams term. President Jefferson was the incoming president he chose not to honor the commissions due to them not being submitted in time.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison:(1803) Judicial review In 1801, Justice William Marbury was to have received a commission from President Adams, but Secretary of State James Madison refused to issue the commission. Chief Justice Marshall stated that the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was the basis for Marbury's claim, conflicted with Article III of the Constitution. Marbury did not receive the commission. This case determined that the Supreme Court and not the states would have the ultimate word on whether an issue was in violation of the Constitution. The ruling, based on judicial review, made the Judicial Branch equal to the other two branches of government.…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CJS 220: Legal Defense

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If reasonable force us used against an individual and there is a threat of imminent bodily harm or death, and the individual defends themselves, that person may be acquitted of first-degree murder. To argue perfect self-defense, and…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Suddenly, the trail he was following stops and leads him into a clearing surrounded by very tall bamboo trees. In the middle of the clearing, sitting on a bench under a little shelter, a little Asian boy seems to be eating something. 4. Charles decides to approach him to ask for directions. Once he gets closer, he asks the child where he is because he thinks that he’s lost.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First the court did know if the wife would be an appropriate witness if the crimes were against her. Second the violence was unprovoked. The wife didn’t do anything wrong to deserves to get struck with a switch. The new scope of the precedent is that if the husband had no reason to hurt his wife, then he should not have engaged in the vicious acts. 5.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, Brown contends that he had a firm constitutional right to stand up and support Jennings if he so chose to. As with any Constitutional right, this right must be allowed except when it begins to interfere and infringe on the ability of educators to safely and effectively carry out their duties to other students. Brown v. Cabell, 598.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employment Discrimation

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages

    1. Did ABC advertising discriminate against Jean on the basis of sex when they failed to…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brown V. Louisiana

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the 1960’s, many African-Americans believed that civil rights should become a national priority. Young civil rights activists brought their cause to the national stage and demanded the federal government assist them and help resolve the issues that plagued them. Many of them challenged segregation in the South by protesting at stores and schools that practiced segregation. Despite the efforts of these groups and Supreme Court rulings that ordered the desegregation of buses and bus stations, violence and prejudice against African-Americans in the South continued (Meyer, F.S., 1968).…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jewell v state case brief

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: Bridget Fisher bought a house in 1989 by herself. She married Barry Jewell, and he helped her fix the house. They lived together on and off and then married in 1990. Later, they got divorced and Jewell moved into his friend's apartment. When Jewell found out that Fisher was seeing another man, he told his friend that he wanted to beat her boyfriends head with a 2 by 4 and cut his dick off.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays