The movie “Schindler’s List” exhibits one such tale of learning, with a man using his fortune to help save the very people he took advantage of to gain it. The movie takes place in Poland during the time of World War II. Oskar Shindler, a member of the Nazi Party, uses the relocation of Jews to his advantage by purchasing a manufacturing company at a deep discount and hiring Jews as the labor force. This not only advantageous for Shindler because their wages are low but also for the Jews as it grants them the chance to leave the ghetto. Soon the ghetto is to be liquidated and Oskar’s workers are to be sent to a forced labor camp. He bribes Göth, the SS officer in charge, into allowing him to build a sub-camp for his workers. At first, Oskar is just doing it for the money. As the movie progresses, however, a change can be seen in Oskar. He tries to save as many lives as possible with the help of Stern, a Jew accountant whose attention to bribes for the Nazis help Oskar’s actions go unnoticed. In one particular scene, Oskar convinces the guards to spray an outgoing train full of Jews with water pretending to be for amusement. His actual purpose is to give them some much needed water.
Oskar’s growth as a human being and willingness to help the very Jews he took advantage of is revealed towards the end of the movie. An order comes down from the higher authorities ordering Göth to destroy all evidence of the Jews killed and sending the remaining ones to the dreaded concentration camp Auschwitz. Knowing that going to Auschwitz is a guaranteed death sentence, Oskar bribes Goth to let him take his workers back to his hometown in Czechoslovakia. Oskar uses his ill gotten fortune to pay a massive amount for each Jew. With the help of Stern, Oskar creates a list of over 800 Jews to be taken back, which coins the title “Schindler’s List”.
At the factory in his hometown, Oskar treats his workers more humanely. He even lets them observe Sabbath once again. To keep them alive, he spends all of his fortune bribing German officials. Just as the money runs out, the war is about to end. Oskar must run now because he is a part of the Nazi party, but before he can go the Jews offer their gratitude by offering him a ring with the engraving “He who saves the life of one man, saves the world entire” (Spielberg). Overcome with emotion, Oskar breaks down in an especially memorable scene wishing he could’ve done more. With his redemption and his will to change, Oskar Shindler is able to save almost a thousand lives destined to die. Even though this story took place over 60 years ago, the development viewed in Oskar can still be found in the present day.
Hester Prynne makes the most of her punishment of being a social outcast to give back to society in the novel The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne. The novel takes place in the late 17th century in Boston. The town is largely Puritan, with firm social rules and strict punishments for those who break them. The crime of adultery, which Hester commits, usually carries the punishment of death by hanging. In Hester’s case, however, it is watered down to wearing a scarlet A on her bosom and being a social outcast for the remainder of her life. This is because Hester’s husband has not surfaced in over two years and is presumed dead. Condemned, Hester faces two options. She can either “sustain and carry” her burdens by the “ordinary resources of her nature, or sink with it” (Hawthorne 59).
With no other source of income and no companion to help, Hester is forced to rely on her skill at needlework to sustain a meager life for her and her daughter Pearl. She gives comfort to the poor and helps the sick when needed. “She came, not as a guest, but as a rightful inmate, into the household that was darkened by trouble” (Hawthorne 123). Even so, people still treat her as if she’s in exile and refuse to acknowledge her in the street during the day time. Hester could have run away to the woods or back to Europe, where no one would know of her sin. She does not however, as she believes she must live out her earthly punishment by the daily shame inflicted upon her. Over time, the towns’ people begin to realize how selfless Hester is and they acknowledge the “A” to stand for able instead of adulteress. Their governor even talks about removing the scarlet letter altogether. Near the end of her life, people “besought her counsel, as one who had herself gone through a mighty trouble” (Hawthorne 203). She offers comfort and advice to those who are facing troubles similar the ones she went through. Hester defies the townspeople and her punishment, becoming stronger and leading a selfless life devoted to helping those in need.
A more modern example is that of Kevin Mitnick, a man who went from being a legendary hacker into a top level computer security consultant. In his early life, Kevin started hacking into computers when he was just a teenager in California. He even figured out a way to bypass the public transportation system in order to get free bus rides in the greater Los Angeles area. He used “social engineering”, a self coined term meaning to con people out of passwords and other sensitive material. Tapping into phone networks to avoid long distance charges, Mitnick moved onto breaking into much larger corporate networks, such has Motorola, NEC, and Nokia. These kinds of hacks landed him in five years at a federal security prison and also earned him legendary status in hacking circles. (Halkin)
Mitnick turned a new leaf once he got out in 2000. He went from being a legendary hacker to becoming one of the most sought after online security consultants in the world. Initially, Mitnick was not even allowed near a computer or any other communications device other than a phone during his supervised release but he fought that in court and won. Once out, Mitnick started his own online security firm, aptly called Mitnick Security Company. He now gives many lectures all over the world and has had two books written about him. As Mitnick states, “I used to get in a lot of trouble and which I now get paid for” (Halkin). After his hacking led to his eventual detention, Mitnick realized the harm he caused and learned to use his extensive knowledge to help others.
Another present day instance of learning from immoral actions is the song “The Boomerang Theory” by Gym Class Heroes. The song tells the tale of a young man who is ready to face the consequences of his actions. The chorus, “they say ‘what goes around comes around’ and I have found that’s real”, can be interpreted as the narrator having had past experiences with karma (Heroes). He seems to have committed actions that aren’t necessarily crimes but immoral nevertheless, shown by the verse “So this is for the frogs that felt the wrath of my firecrackers/and all the roaches that I stomped with no regard” (Heroes). He look’s back on his previous actions and believes the punishment being doled out on him is entirely justified. Exactly what the punishment is he does not say. “I got arrested by the karma police beat down” is more of a metaphorical reference as no such thing as the “karma police” really exists (Heroes).
The lyrics, “So here I am in handcuffs the s*** that makes a man tough” and “I’ll accept the charges” show the maturing of the narrator (Heroes). He learns to accept the consequences of his actions and appears to have learned from his mistakes. No longer is he “[hopping] on [his] feet and [skipping] town”, but instead taking his punishment with his head held high (Heroes). After receiving it, the narrator believes that it was necessary “to fall just to stand and realize [he’s] just a man” (Heroes). This is a great change from the ridiculous actions he partakes in previously such as soaking farmers with water-guns. He pleads “I learned my lesson, I’m confessing, hit the record”, and one can presume he won’t be taking part in any such immature activities any longer (Heroes).
A case where committing a crime leads to insanity and paranoia is the short story The Tell Tale Heart by Edgar Allen Poe. Throughout the entire story, he constantly reminds the reader that he is not mad, when it is apparent that he very well is. He says “[he] loved the old man”, and yet after he kills him, the narrator seems almost giddy with joy and feels no remorse (Allen Poe 7)The basis for his motive is a “pale blue eye” that makes his “blood run cold” (Allen Poe 7). He goes on to explain how he stalks the old man every night, in an almost creepy fashion and after some time decides to kill him. After committing the horrifying deed in great detail, he still pleads to the reader to believe in his sanity. He cuts up the dead mans body and put it under the floorboards as not to leave any evidence. As the police come to investigate, the narrator is very relaxed believing his precautions leave him with “nothing to fear” (Allen Poe 11).
The narrator’s confidence grows exponentially as the police look around and he believes he is in the clear. He ever sits the officers down on chairs right beneath the body parts. At this crucial part of the story, Poe examines the effects of committing murder. The narrator talks of a distinct ringing that only he seems to hear. He grows more and more paranoid, believing that the police knew of his deeds. The ringing is of the old mans dead heart, which is actually in the narrators mind. It is a metaphorical reference to his conscience protesting against the murder. The ringing growing louder and louder, the clearly insane man rips open the floorboards and confesses to the deed. His previous attempts at sanity serve to convince not only the reader he is not mad but also himself. He visibly underestimates the power of his conscience after committing murder and instead of learning from his mistakes, it leads to his insanity.
Oftentimes it is not the action itself but what one can learn from it that matters. There are two paths that can be taken. One is to simply ignore what happened and forget about aftermath. The other is to decide to act upon it to help others and give back or even to simply better oneself. The latter option seems like common sense but it is much easier to say than to do, especially in a world where mistakes are frowned upon. To put it simply, “The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing” (John Powell Quotes).
Works Cited
Allen Poe, Edgar. The Tell Tale Heart. 1843.
Halkin, Tayla. Legendary hacker Mitnick turns Legit. July 24 2008. 15 December 2008 .
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Scarlet Letter. Needham: Prentice Hall, 1850.
Heroes, Gym Class. "The Boomerang Theory." Clothes Off! UK, 2007.
James Joyce Quotes. 14 December 2008 .
John Powell Quotes. 15 December 2008 .
Schindler 's List. Dir. Steven Spielberg. 1993.
Cited: Allen Poe, Edgar. The Tell Tale Heart. 1843. Halkin, Tayla. Legendary hacker Mitnick turns Legit. July 24 2008. 15 December 2008 . Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Scarlet Letter. Needham: Prentice Hall, 1850. Heroes, Gym Class. "The Boomerang Theory." Clothes Off! UK, 2007. James Joyce Quotes. 14 December 2008 . John Powell Quotes. 15 December 2008 . Schindler 's List. Dir. Steven Spielberg. 1993.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The case study presented is a young immigrant couple striving to better their lives in a country of opportunity. This couple has endured a hard-working life style to begin a new life as a young married couple in their own home. The problem that they encounter is that the young wife discovers she is pregnant, which may have been a joyous surprise to the couple, but an ultrasound revealed that the fetus has an abnormality of the absence of bilateral arm development and a 25% chance that the fetus may have Down syndrome. The dilemma is how the physician and young couple and family have differing beliefs of what it means to be human.…
- 1377 Words
- 6 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Having the conscious decision to commit a crime can affect society in the areas of healthcare, the…
- 263 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Ethics, Morality, and Integrity all have some of the same elements that defines a person character. Being trustworthy leads to other elements of integrity. Such as, helping to better the community and respecting authority as a Parole Officer shows honesty. Being fair is another element which shows integrity. How can you be a Parole Officer, but doesn`t treat everyone equally? Third, being able to take responsibility for your own actions and personal growth as a Parole Officer shows integrity, as well. If you basically blame all of your failures and lack of progress on others around you then that shows your character and you cannot exhibit integrity with others and your career if you cannot be honest to yourself. Ethics as a Parole Officer could…
- 255 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The long debated question of the importance of men and women and their roles has raged on for years. Should men and women be treated equally, that truly is the question that seems to have more answers than resolution. Applying the question to Deontology and the work of Immanuel Kant, the answer would be all people regardless of gender should be treated equally. However, these theories do not take into account the actions of the male or female in question. The question still remains, should men and women be treated equally or should it be based on the situation, all accounts will be taken into further consideration.…
- 756 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Given the following scenario “During lunch in the hospital cafeteria, a fellow worker tells a group of individuals that a friend of hers is in the hospital having cosmetic surgery. She continues to describe the extent and nature of the surgery.” This statement is wrong in many ways but I do not think that she broke a code of ethics. First it never states what the person telling her coworkers does at the hospital. She could work in housekeeping, while she has certain obligations based on the fact she works at the hospital but not directly with patients therefor not ever participating in the Code of Ethics for Medical Assistants or Nurses respecting the patient’s privacy.…
- 596 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Imagine a world in which the Jewish population was much more prevalent. During the late 1930’s there were around 15 million Jews worldwide. However, by 1945 there were only 11 million Jews worldwide (Weinberg xii). How had there been such a drastic decrease in the Jewish population? The answer is one man: Adolf Hitler. Adolf Hitler was a German politician who was the dictator of Germany from 1934-1945. During this time, Hitler preached that there could only be one race, the master race. Anyone that did not look German or could not prove that they were not Jewish was forcefully executed in death camps. At these death camps, Jews were used as lab rats for doctors to experiment on. Hitler believed that the Jewish presence in Germany would kill Germany just like bacteria kills an organism (Koenigsberg 2). Hitler once said, “Once I really am in power, my first and foremost task will be the annihilation of the Jews" (Fleming 17). Overall, over 14 million people perished at the hands of Adolf Hitler. Without Hitler, there would be no holocaust, which would mean that there would be no laws against torture because the inhumanity that the Jews faced scripted the torture laws that exist today.…
- 2268 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
We do things because we are so minded; our acts are the results of our thoughts and judgments. Clearly, the effects of an action correspond to the thoughts that caused the action, so when we do a thing wrongly we can only blame the judgment that led us to it. We shall no longer blame family, neighbor or fortune for causing our ills once we freely admit that we alone are responsible for our actions and not anything outside of…
- 673 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Scarlet Letter. Norton Critical 3rd Editon. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1988. 4-178.…
- 1701 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
“Choice theories state that the decision to commit (or refrain from) crime is an exercise of free will based on the offender’s efforts to maximize pleasure and minimize pain.” In this paper, I will look at choice theories and the common models in how society determines which acts are considered to be criminal, and how these are impacted by choice theories of crime.…
- 878 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
This theory is based around the principle that an individual’s behaviors and choices are influenced by what he/she reasons is the “means and ends” or “cost and benefits” in regards to criminal activity. In short, the criminal activity that an individual chooses to act on, is a decision made based on the risk, consequences, and benefit to them. The development of this theory is identified with Italian social philosopher Cesare Beccaria, who lived from 1738 to 1794. A…
- 1346 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Therefore, when reading this the Seiple & Eifler (2008) work, one is able to gain more knowledge about criminal offending and rational choice theory. They were able to successfully start with bringing up routine activities theory, and integrating the theory that opportunity, in their research in relation to rational choice theory, is explained as the ratio of getting caught versus not getting caught. Therefore, when one is rationally thinking, their chance of getting caught is high, they will employ more self-control, not partake in the opportunity, costs and benefits have been weighed, and a final decision has been made based on their own emotions, situation, and self-control (Seiple & Eifler,…
- 1199 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
We are responsible for our choices ,and we have to accept the consequences of every deed…
- 272 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Building on classical theory, crime is seen as a choice that is influenced by its costs and benefits—that is, by its “rationality.” Crime will be more likely to be deterred if its costs are raised (e.g., more effort required, more punishment applied), especially if the costs are certain and immediate. Information about the costs and benefits of crime can be obtained by direct experiences with punishment and punishment avoidance, and indirectly by observing whether others who offend are punished or avoid punishment. Rational choice theory is the customary name for the idea that criminals engage in some intelligent thought before choosing to commit a crime.…
- 262 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The classical theorists hold central the concept that man is capable of free will (Hollin, 1989). Crime can be explained in terms of choices between criminal behaviour (if the opportunity arose) or non-criminal behaviour. If the rewards for a criminal act are greater than the retribution, the probability of criminal behaviour increases (Hollin,…
- 4363 Words
- 18 Pages
Powerful Essays -
An excellent quote is taken from Elisabeth Kubler-Ross and states “I believe that we are solely responsible for our choices and we have to accept the consequences of every deed, word and thought throughout our lives.” What this is saying is that everything we do, say or think comes with consequences that can affect our school, home, community or even country in either a negative or positive way.…
- 319 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays