Preview

Legal Rights During Trial

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1123 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal Rights During Trial
Legal Rights during Trial

Shelby Cullison
Introduction to Criminal Justice
Prof. Gaspar
March 22nd, 2013

Legal rights during a trial can be very important to the defendant in a case. These rights provide a lot of different options so that they can have their own choices about the case. All of these rights are in the 6th amendment to help the defendant in trial. I am going to discuss to you 4 of 8 different right for a defendant. The four I am going to be discussing are as follows, the right to confront witnesses, the right to counsel at trial, the right to a speedy trial, and the right to a public trial. The first one I am going to be discussing the right to confront witnesses. It states in the 6th amendment, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right… to be confronted with the witness against him.” (Siegel L. & Worrall J. 2013). This means that not only is the defendant allowed to confront any witness of their choosing but they can also participate in any way they want to in their own case. This can all be taken away from the defendant if misconduct is committed. This is done by the defendant not showing up for court. The confrontation can be violated if a testimony taken outside of the court and used to convict the accused while in court. Recently the court made the decision to extend that the defendant be able to question the analyst while in trial. This was a big change because they said that the testimony should be come out at trial and the analyst should not have to be questioned. Another way this cannot happen is if the defendant killed the witness they would not be allowed to appear at the hearing. There is something known as the confrontation clause which is very important in a trial. This restricts the, what is known as, the hearsay evidence. This is secondhand information or also known as the he said/ she said evidence. All evidence has to be face to face information, coming from the person that seen it with



References: Nolo, (2013), Criminal Defendants’ Rights during Trial: The Bill of Rights, http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/defendants-rights-during-court-trial- 29793.html. Cornell University Law School, (August 19th, 2010), Right to Counsel, http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/right_to_counsel. Siegel L.J. &Worrall J. L., (2013), Introduction to Criminal Justice. Finn D., (n.d.), Right to Counsel, http://www.dallascriminallawyer.com/counsel.html.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Alabama, and overruled Betts v. Brady, which allowed selective application of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel to the states, itself previously binding only in federal cases. Instead, the court held that the right to the assistance of counsel was a fundamental right, essential for a fair trial, thereby emphasizing the procedural safeguards which were needed for due process of law. In this sense, the court ruled specifically that no one, regardless of wealth, education or class, should be charged with a crime and then be forced to face his accusers in court without the guidance of counsel. All of the other justices concurred in the judgment.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The right to a fair trial. Where does it come from? The 6th Amendment. Which category of defendants were the first to be given this right when accused of a crime by a state? Anyone charged with a capital offense (must be provided an attorney) Which category came next? Anyone charged with a felony (must be provided an attorney) Which criminal defendants still do not have this right? If he or she is not sentenced to actual imprisonment and could not have been sentenced for more than one year.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rights and duties are correlative. The Hollywood film, "Run Away Jury," sensationally depicts a number of the processes that jurors experience during a criminal trial. View the film and then discuss, based on the chapter readings, what these rights and duties are that attach to jurors?…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amendment Six: Case Study

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first clause of Amendment Six is the speedy trial clause. There are several reasons that this clause is positive to the accused in a case on trial. Primarily the right to a speedy trial can prevent undue and oppression, and minimize the anxiety and concern that accompanies public accusation. A speedy trial can limit the possibility that long delay will impair the ability of an accused to defend himself. Furthermore, delaying a trial is can tamper with the evidence and witnesses because over time evidence can lose value and witnesses could forget what happened at the the crime scene or even die before the trial takes place. The right of a speedy trial can also be in opposition to the interests of the accused because it can cause the accused…

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cypop 5 Task 1 Legislation

    • 4661 Words
    • 19 Pages

    * Right to a Fair Trial- You are innocent until proven guilty. If accused of a crime, you have the right to hear the evidence against you, in a court of law. All trials must be fair and impartial.…

    • 4661 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I. The confrontation clause of the sixth amendment to the United States constitution provides that all criminals’ prosecutions, the accused shall exploit the right to confront the witnesses against him. the Confrontation Clause applies to ``witnesses'' against the accused, meaning ``those who 'bear testimony'' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confrontation_Clause 1. The sixth amendment goes on to protect the right of the accused person on trial to confront witnesses who will give evidence to support a guilty verdict.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prosecution can expose whether Witness and Defendant have colluded in an effort to mislead the jury, or, conversely, can clear an innocent defendant. In sum, by granting use immunity and assuming Witness' truthfulness, 2 1 we can avoid the two flaws of convicting an innocent defendant or freeing a guilty defendant. The state of the law in this area invites several observations about evidentiary and constitutional law. Forbidding Defendant from trying to benefit from Witness' assertion of the fifth amendment is an example of the choice evidence law often makes: to exclude problematic evidence rather than to search for ways to help the jury identify and understand estimation problems. Although the import of Witness' privilege assertion is not pellucid, the court could help the jury more than it does in the typical trial by noting the inferences the jury might draw. 22 Alternatively, as this article suggests in Part V, the law might adopt a model of admissibility loosely drawn from discovery rules. Under this model, Defendant (and perhaps any party) could introduce any relevant evidence as long as he shared it with the prosecution far enough in advance of trial to enable the prosecution to investigate. Finally, we need to ask whether Defendant's sixth amendment right to compulsory process includes the right to try to profit from Witness' fifth amendment privilege assertion. Arguably, the sixth amendment topples the categorical rule that no litigant, not even the…

    • 4738 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An example is the case of Adrian Jackson v. State of Indiana, in which the defendant requested a retrial after being found guilty because, he argued, his decision to represent himself in court was not made “knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently” (Odendahl). The Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the trial court that the trial court had warned Jackson of the negative aspects of self-representation and had provided him with enough advice (Odendahl). Another recent case is the case of Marq Hall v. State of Indiana. Hall, following his trial and being found guilty of child molestation, argued that his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him was violated when he was not allowed to compel his accuser, the victim’s mother, to “answer a deposition question about an incident in the victim’s past” (Hall v. State). However, while the Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the trial court and remanded a new trial for Hall, further investigation showed that even if Hall’s Sixth Amendment right was violated, it was harmless and would not make any difference to the outcome of the trial (Hall v.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courts became more involved with the actions taking place and they also made it known to the people that before accusing someone of a crime there must be accurate proof of the person committing the crime. This called for a revaluation of the fifth and sixth amendments. “Most of the rights that are related to the Salem Witch Trials deal with in the fifth and sixth amendment. The Fifth Amendment gives us rights such as, grand jury, double jeopardy, self-incrimination, and due process, while the sixth amendment gives us rights like jury trial, right to confront and…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S Constitutional amendments place limits on what law enforcement and how a trial should be governed. These strict rights are to be followed because if an officer fails to abide by the proper procedure, the trial court may forcibly put an end to evidence obtained in violation of proper procedure or even release the arrested suspect. This is an amendment that deals with each of the following: criminal due process, arrest, interrogation, search and seizure, Miranda, punishment, the right to jury trials, and the right to counsel.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fifth Amendment Clauses

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This amendment is known to most Americans than whatever is left of the amendments due to the renowned expression: I argue the fifth. This expression is habitually utilized as a protection within criminal trials. The amendment comprises of five separate clauses. These clauses are double jeopardy clause, grand jury clause, the self-incrimination clause, due process clause and the taking 's clause. The Fifth Amendment’s guarantees Americans a few essential rights. For example, the right not to be rebuffed or attempted more than once for the same wrongdoing, right to proper sensible payment for any private property taken by the legislature for open utilization, and the right to trial for specific law violations by grand…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introducing Evidence

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When these types of statements are introduced, Confrontation Clause issues arise. Under the 6th amendment, an accused has the right to confront the witness against him. The courts have shifted in their approach to the analysis regarding the confrontation clause.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Our legal rights are also outlined in the Bill of Rights. Amendments 5 through 10 express our rights as citizens to speedy trial, reserved powers, and rights of accused persons in criminal proceedings. I also learned the types of fines and charges that can be given to criminals in cases such as domestic violence. Another case that I observed was Michael Baron vs. Maria and Angelica Delgado. Maria and Angelica Delgado were the plaintiffs, which charged Baron with aggravated assault and battery and he was also charged with violating his restraining…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The right to a fair trial – This right does not apply to criminal proceedings but to a broad range of areas where an individual civil rights or responsibilities are decided upon. Examples of relevant issues relating to this would be compensation claims, the complaints procedure of public bodies and appeal procedures in social security, mental health care and treatment tribunals.…

    • 1698 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    6th Amendment guarantees you a speedy trail, an impartial jury, that the accused can comfort the witnesses against them, and must be allowed a…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays