Preview

Less Lethal Weapons

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2495 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Less Lethal Weapons
Less than Lethal Weapons by Clayton Moss
Less than lethal weapons were developed to provide law enforcement, corrections, and military personnel with an alternative to lethal force. The term less lethal weapons refers to weapons such as bean bag shotshells, rubber bullets, and electronic stun devices to name a few. They are designed to temporarily incapacitate, confuse, delay, or restrain a suspect in a variety of situations. They have been used primarily in on-the-street confrontations and suicide interventions, but have also been applied in riots, prison disturbances, and hostage rescues.
History
The concept of less lethal weaponry is not new. Law enforcement has long operated with what is called a "continuum of force." It provides guidance to officers for selecting the type of weaponry to use in a variety of situations. The continuum normally begins with asking a subject to respond to voice commands. If the subject does not respond, the continuum may advise that the next level of force be used, in many cases, pepper spray (Pearson, 2003). If the subject is wielding a firearm, lethal force may then be used. Law enforcement has long recognized that a wide and dangerous gap exists in the range of tools available to them. The only tools traditionally available, baton or gun, may be either too weak or too strong a response to some situations. This fact became clear after the Supreme Court ruled in Tennessee v. Garner that the use of deadly force to apprehend apparently unarmed, nonviolent fleeing felons was an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment (Pearson, 2003). Edwin Meese, who was Attorney General at the time, called a conference to address the need for alternatives to deadly force. As a result of this conference, the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) established a less-than-lethal technologies program. Through this program, NIJ seeks technologies that provide new or significantly improved less lethal options to law enforcement and corrections



References: Alvirez, D. (2001). ALS Technologies. Retrieved April 23, 2003, from http://www.ozarkmtns.com/less-lethal.html. Donnelly, T. (2001). Less Lethal Technologies. Retrieved April 19, 2003, from http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/pcrg/psdb/publications/lesslethal.pdf Hart, S James, S. (2002). Less Lethal. Law and Order, 8, 87-93. Laurel, C. L. (1999). New technologies protect officers and inmates. Corrections Today, 8, 134-136. Law and Order. (2003). Phoenix patrols with Tasers. 1, 6. Nielsen, E. (2001). Taser International takes the Taser to a higher level. Law and Order, 5, 57-62. Pearson, C. (2003). Less-Lethal Weapons. Retrieved April 5, 2003, from http://www.nleta.com/articles/lesslethal weapons.html Sanow, E Shin, C. (2002). Less-lethal weapons could be more lethal. Forty Niner, 8. Wilmette. (2000). Portable, less lethal alternatives. Law and Order, 9, 32-35. Wilmette. (2001). The Jaycor pepperball system. Law and Order, 11, 92-95. Wilmette. (2002). Beanbags as an effective alternative. Law and Order, 8, 100-101.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The world is full of camera phones, different social media outlets, and the work of law enforcement is not hidden anymore, the general public can see the police officers performing their jobs. However, those officers quick to use gun or Taser lack the skills in de-escalation when dealing with a minor hostile situation. Nevertheless, the case of Bryan v. McPherson was related to a situation of officer Brian McPherson and motorist Carl Bryan, which Mr. Bryan was pulled over and issued a citation early that same day and headed to southern California from Camarillo to Coronado.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North Aurora Police Department currently allows officers to carry their choice of 9mm or .45 caliber pistols; no long guns are available. The Firearms Training Unit has proposed that the department adopt the .223 caliber rifle for patrol officer use. The reasons for this proposal are: (1) pistols are inherently less accurate and have a shorter effective range than long guns such as rifles and shotguns, (2) pistol caliber bullets penetrate more heavily through interior walls than .223 rifle caliber bullets, which causes an increased risk of unintended persons being hit, and (3) pistol caliber bullets will not penetrate body armor and many other obstacles commonly encountered, while most .223 caliber bullets will. The objective of this research is to determine if the NAPD should adopt a long gun for patrol officer use or keep the current pistol-only program as it is. The types of weapons under consideration are pistol caliber rifles (9mm and .45 caliber), shotguns (slugs and buckshot), and the .223 caliber rifle. These weapons will be compared and contrasted with respect to accuracy & range, ease of use, wounding ability, and barrier penetration. Immediate Incapacitation Officers shoot to immediately achieve physiological incapacitation of a suspect who is threatening life. This means that the suspect is rendered physically incapable of continuing his or her life threatening behavior. This is done by (1) damaging or destroying the suspect’s central nervous system by shooting the brain or upper spinal cord, or (2) interrupting blood flow to the brain, to cause unconsciousness, through shooting the center mass of the suspect. Stopping blood flow to the brain is done by creating…

    • 10371 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cj 211 Unit 9 Assignment

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Less than lethal technologies are used to control violent people without using physical force that could harm to both the officer and the suspect (National Institue of Justice, n.d.). There are seven kinds of less-than lethal technologies: directed energy devices, chemicals, distraction,…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tennesee vs. Garner

    • 819 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tennessee v. Garner was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that under the Fourth Amendment, when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, he or she may use deadly force only to prevent escape if the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others. Before Tennessee v. Garner some states had it written in law that they could use any means in order to apprehend a fleeing felon, including deadly force. Unfortunately a 15 year old kid had to be killed before someone challenged that law and say it violates their constitutional rights.…

    • 819 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although conducted energy weapons have been widely used by various law enforcement agencies throughout the country, the sudden death of Robert Dziekanski at Vancouver International Airport triggered a public outcry; a commission was led by Thomas R. Braidwood to determine the safety and training of officers in utilizing such weapons. After having consulted with numerous medical, scientific and legal experts, he recommended 19 changes be made regarding officers’ training and deployment of conducted energy weapons. These recommendations ranged from legislative changes and province wide standards to higher thresholds for weapons use and periodic testing of CEWs. For the purposes of this report, we will focus on the subject behavior…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taser Vs Xrep Essay

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Since ECD (Electronic Control Devices) such as Tasers were introduced, officers of the law have been relying less on lethal force and more on what is known as less-lethal force. The Tasers commonly used in law enforcement, however, only had a range of about twenty feet. This created a “capability gap” of 35-65 feet where the officer could not use a Taser and was hesitant to use a gun, but the assailant could still throw something deadly. As a result, the XREP (eXtended Range Electronic Projectile) a self-contained version of traditional Tasers, was the solution. To go along with the XREP, the X12 was a specially designed shotgun to maximize the ability…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Police Brutality Case

    • 2262 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Teaching an officer when to use their gun, how far away would be considered appropriate to use their weapon, what type of weapon should they use with certain distances, etc. With this knowledge, we could help our officers better protect themselves from either far away distances or up front. If someone is coming at you from fifteen feet away with a knife, what can you do when they charge at you? There are many different ways an officer could approach this situation, but instinct tells us “grab your gun.” However, grabbing your gun is not always the best option, as grabbing it can lessen your time to react and actually prevent from being…

    • 2262 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taser Overuse

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The use of taser should be permitted to extend that such use is necessary to police officers should have some understanding of the effects that using weapon is likely to have upon a suspect before using the weapon.…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discretion In Cjs

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Taser is an electrical weapon used by the NSW Police Force. It is designed to incapacitate human beings and to prevent fatalities and permanent injuries. The use of Tasers by the NSW Police Force is regulated under the LEPR Act 2002 (NSW), which highlights that police are not to use Tasers until they have properly assessed the situation and the environment. Tasers are used to protect human life, police, or anyone who is in danger of any bodily risk, violent confrontation or violent resistance. Under the LEPR Act 2002 (NSW), police are accountable and responsible for their use of force and must be able to justify their use of a Taser. This demonstrates that discretion through the use of a Taser protects individuals from harm, as well as meeting the needs of the…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Taser Guns Are Bad

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Stun guns like Tasers are often preferred by officers simply for their easy use, better user control as well as lesser danger to both the officer and the target. If they are used after a proper warning, that if the target does not calm down, a Taser gun is most likely to be used against him, they could stand a better chance of achieving a safe end…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Over the years, the issue concerning the use of non lethal force in Policing and the Criminal Justice system has been a very controversial and debated topic. These weapons used by the Police have saved a considerable amount of lives and have proven themselves as a useful tool in making the jobs of the police more effective and efficient. Non lethal weapons are designed to incapacitate people or disable equipment with effects that are only temporary and completely reversible. These weapons are meant to cause no permanent change to the person, whether that should be physically or mentally. The police have these weapons as an alternative to using lethal force, therefore decreasing the likelihood…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Tasers Is Bad

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages

    David Hambling, a respected free lance writer on technology and military states, “[a] recent study in the American Journal of Public Health looked at 24, 000 cases in which police officers had used force, including Tasers, pepper spray, batons and manual methods . . . the study found that Taser use reduced the overall risk of injury by 65 percent. In other words, restricting Taser use could triple the number of injuries caused in this sort of incident” (1). Misconceptions on the use of Taser led to a comment by a person who goes by the name “the disturber” on CBC news website, he says, “what's wrong with people when they [start] using devices that can pump out over 1500 volts for self defence that's just not cool. [D]oesn't any one remember the guy who got [tasered] 5 times at the air port because he wasn't "co-operating" with the security; wasn't he killed because of the shock? [I] think that they should be banned from use for a less [lethal] item like pepper spray” (#). Pepper sprays can not be used in closed areas because it will effect innocent bystanders, also, as Jim Wilkinson, the Vice President of the site Your Greatest Protection declares, “[pepper spray] works longer than Tasers or stun guns, it will cause coughing and choking, and it burns really bad . . . [s]tun guns work by disabling the nervous and the muscular system but…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Greenfeld, L.A., Langan, P.A., & Smith, S.K. (1999). Police use of force: Collection of National.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tasers

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    tasers are useful tools for police officers and also that they add a “use of force continuum” used…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the future, instead of a normal squad car, someone might see a bulletproof truck. What is cool about it is that, they are strictly for the safety of police officers; they do not need to worry about a warrant, or hurting someone. This tool in the future would save officers lives. The bulletproof trucks are crash resistant/ damage resistant, during a high speed chase, and can possible handle a small missile fire.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics