Letter To Arne Duncan Language Analysis

Tone is a matter of great importance in writing, and is a key feature in any work of literature. Furthermore, it’s crucial in determining the deeper meanings of rhetorical writings as well--such as my letter to Mr. Wagner and my letter to Arne Duncan. Each paper has its own uniques style of how it wants to presents ideas, and this type of writing--also known as voice--is determined through the identification and analysis of context, audience, and purpose. For example, my letter to Mr. Wagner can be characterized as being energetic, yet reflective because of its incorporation of both logos and pathos in the text--stressing the usage of abstract language, and literary allusions; however, the voice discerned in the letter to Arne Duncan is more admirable and foreboding, incorporating logos, ethos, and pathos--in other words, the text characterised restrained and fair-minded language, use of imagery to spark emotion, and factual examples.
This statement serves as a wake up call, and arouses the reader to constantly be on their toes. After this line, the tone conveys the sense that the writer is energetic and excited. Further in Wagner’s introduction, the simplified words which give a sense of the writer’s urgency transition to make the text slow down--almost to a complete stop. In contrast, the letter to Duncan takes a very different approach, setting up an admirable and thoughtful voice through the statement “I have come to admire you, not because of your liberal policies...”, the periods--along with the slow, discreet commas weaving in between every line--separate each statement with a sense of grace and fluency--keeping the speed of the text at leisurely pace. Therefore, it’s safe to infer that from the introductions, the letter to duncan is much calmer, formal, and more predictable than the letter to