Preview

Lewis Cass 1848

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
785 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lewis Cass 1848
This campaign advertisement for Lewis Cass in the election of 1848 targeted male farmers and slave owners in the South. This is because women still could not vote, and many “conscience-Whigs” in the North, were in support of the presidential candidate Zachary Taylor, so it would be best for Cass to turn to the South for support. Also, some in the South began supporting Zachary Taylor, for they had assumed that since both Taylor and Andrew Jackson were great war heroes, they would have similar qualities, which is another reason why Cass’s advertisement targeted the South(“A.M.Z.T”). This advertisement was also an attempt to win over some votes from the Whig party, since there was much controversy within the Whig party at that time regarding whether Taylor was qualified to be president. A big portion of this advertisement castigated Taylor, and many of these criticisms were political references more understandable in the nineteenth century. This advertisement also helped distinguish Cass’s position on the highly controversial topic of slavery. The topic of slavery caused significant division in America. This was partly due to the fact that America had recently acquired the land known as present day California, Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, and Colorado. Aside from that, the results of the 1846 Mexican American War also led to the annexation of Texas (Howe). With such a huge increase in land, the big question came down to whether or not slavery would be prohibited, and many in the North and South held different viewpoints on the tolerance of slavery. Slavery inevitably became the most vital influence on the outcome of presidential election of 1848. In order to lambaste Taylor in a more effective manner, Cass needed to make political references in his advertisement. In 1846, a man named David Wilmot proposed the Wilmot Proviso, which claimed that slavery should be banned in the land won over from the Mexican American war. Though this bill was vetoed, it

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    David Wilmot was democratic congressman from Pennsylvania. He introduced a measure in Congress called the “William Proviso”. He wanted to prohibit slavery in any lands acquired from Mexico. In addition, he did not want slavery or blacks to corrupt territory that was solely for whites. However, the William Proviso failed to become a law.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Polk died just three months after leaving office, Senator Lewis Cass of Michigan took his place. To maintain the one party unity on the issue of slavery, Cass proposed a new idea, squatter (popular) sovereignty. Under this concept, Congress would allow the settlers in each territory the right to determine their status as a free or slave territory. Sadly, Cass’s plan of squatter sovereignty failed to persuade the northern democrats because they joined the Free-Soil Party which prohibited the expansion of slavery in the western territories. Squatter (popular) sovereignty was important because without it, the rights and liberties of the citizens in the US wouldn’t be fully protected by federal measures.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were also personal disputes in the time period. Arguments led into admitting California as a free state. Southerners did not agree with this opportunity and wanted California as a Southern Slave State. Other arguments between the North and South were the formations of governments in the South without limitations on slavery, giving orders to Texas to withdraw the land claims in New Mexico, evening out Texas by having the federal government to strike the state’s debts, allowing slavery to last in Washington D.C., banning slave trade in Washington D.C., passing a more successful fugitive slave law, and limiting Congress from sliding into the interstate slave…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    UNIT 8 Manifest Destiny

    • 578 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Issue 7 – Why did the annexation of Texas cause such intense sectional tension in the US?…

    • 578 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Constraint: Northern states opinion on anti-slavery, the time frame of the speech and how he gave the speech.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The introduction to slavery was one of the factors in how these two countries battled, as Texas didn't quite listen to slaves. Either way, the…

    • 2319 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilmot Proviso Tension

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Wilmot Proviso was an attempt to settle the dispute on newly gained Mexican Territories. Slavery became a subject of discussion in Congress despite the Gag Rule, a series of rules adopted by Congress in order to prevent antislavery petitions. Slavery became a huge focus politically. Not only did the Wilmot Proviso make slavery a politically huge discussion, but it also was a step towards the Compromise of 1850. Lastly, the Wilmot Proviso caused the tension between the North and the South to increase, because the South depended on slavery the Proviso would prohibit slavery to expand to the newly gained territories, resulting in much more power for the North.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the Mexican War ended, America was ceded western territories. This caused a problem on whether these new territories would be admitted as slave states or free states. To deal with this, Congress passed the Compromise of 1850 which basically made California free and allowed the people to pick in Utah and New Mexico. The ability of a state to decide whether it would allow slavery or not was called popular sovereignty.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Divided the Mexican Cession into 2 territories— Utah and New Mexico—and allowed the settlers in these territories to decide on the issue of slavery by popular sovereignty…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around the 1840s, the US aspired to annex Texas and incorporate it as a state within the Union. However, gaining Texas had its consequences as it lead a war with Mexico. William Ellery Channing, an abolitionist and pacifist, saw that the policy regarding obtaining Texas would led the “nation into war” as it severed as “encroachment,” and a way “to propagate the curse of slavery.” (Doc 2) The annexation of Texas was seen invading Texas’ link to Mexico as in document one, the American Review stated the annexation “shall dissolve the slight bounds that now link the province to Mexico” (Doc 1) This served as a situation for Mexico, who had refused to recognize Texas’ independence and its takeover by the United States, although President James Polk, a strong supporter of the annexation of Texas as seen in his Inaugural Address- where he stated “none can fail to see the danger to our safety and future peace if Texas remains an independent states,” attempted to aid Mexico in coming to an understanding. Therefore, the Mexican War broke out, out of the effort for Texas to break free its bond to Mexico. Eventually, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the war, and came to an agreement that included setting boundaries for Texas and the acquisition of new territory- California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Knox Polk Dbq

    • 2332 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This created a hot debate over the war itself and the spread of slavery. In 1846 a congressman introduced an amendment to a spending bill, Wilmot Proviso. The bill asserted that slavery wouldn’t be allowed to exist in the territory acquired from Mexico (Dusinberre 148). Polk found the entire bill to be “foolish and mischievous”, believing that there was no connection between peace with Mexico and slavery (Nevins 138). Polk claimed to have no interest in extending slavery but it was noted that he was an avid slave owner and many even considered racist. He even bought and sold slaves while in the White House and took measures to keep it a secret (Nevins…

    • 2332 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Mexican-American war, the United States gained the Mexican Cession. This led to Americans wondering whether slavery should be excepted into the west. The idea was for just white laborers to get the benefit of settling in. Abolitionist didn’t like this feeling it would bring slavery to an end. The south also disagreed and even threatened to leave the union (The Compromise of 1850, n.d.).…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A massive 3,809,525 square mile country, on the brink of chaos, torn apart by one issue: slavery. During the antebellum period, in the South of the United States, Africans were slaves that were considered property and could be purchased, traded, and inherited just like any other object. Slaves were denied their basic human rights. Although slavery was almost always a problem in the United States, with the Northerners being abolitionists and Southerners being pro-slavery, there were more events that eventually led to the start of a civil war. The annexation of Sumner and Lincoln’s election increased tensions between the North and South, which ultimately led to the American Civil War.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Popular Sovereignty

    • 260 Words
    • 1 Page

    During the time period 1846 there was much controversy on whether particular states should be free or proslavery. Senator Lewis Cass of Michigan was the first to try to improve these relations and conflicts by presenting the idea of popular sovereignty while opposing the Wilmot proviso. Despite his attempts and those of Stephen A. Douglas with his plan, this political doctrine failed in its attempts to resolve the dilemma of slavery in the territories by the civil war.…

    • 260 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manifest Destiny

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The expansion of the United States from its thirteen original colonies to the nation it is today was a very extensive process, involving numerous wars and treaties. The greatest one of these expansion periods occurred from the 1830s to the 1860s, largely due to the idea of Manifest Destiny, the belief that American settlers were destined to expand across the continent to the Pacific coast. This development played a major role in dividing the North and the South by contributing to contrasting ideologies of the two regions towards social and economic foundations of the new territory, and would eventually lead up to the Civil War, literally dividing the nation into two. Territorial expansion fashioned racial and social divisions in the American society due to slavery, created new enemies for the States as a result of the annexation of Texas against the will of Mexico, and endangered the harmony between the North and the South by cause of the Dred vs. Scott decision.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics