Author(s): Eric Voegelin, Mary Algozin and Keith Algozin
Source: The Review of Politics, Vol. 36, No. 4 (Oct., 1974), pp. 504-520
Published by: Cambridge University Press for the University of Notre Dame du lac on behalf of
Review of Politics
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1406338 .
Accessed: 17/09/2014 05:49
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp .
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
.
Cambridge University Press and University of Notre Dame du lac on behalf of Review of Politics are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Review of Politics.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 14.139.45.241 on Wed, 17 Sep 2014 05:49:12 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Liberalism and Its History*
Erie Voegelin
Translated from the German by Mary and Keith Algozin
The taskofsketching history liberalism, of the is though modest, formethodological reasons For the difficult. we standbefore questionofwhether is there evensucha thing liberalism a clearly as as
definablesubject and whetherthissubject,should it not be clearly definable, can have a history. We touch here upon a general methodologicalproblem. Toynbee, for example, opens his great workwiththe questionwhether he England has a history; concludes that the English nation as a society is so closely related to the society of Western civilizationthat one cannot write an English withoutgoing into the entirehistory Westerncivilization. of history
It is in