Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Life and Success Because of the Atomic Bomb

Powerful Essays
1668 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Life and Success Because of the Atomic Bomb
Mario Lopez
ENC 1102 Fiedler
23 October 2012
Argumentative Essay
Life and Success because of the Atomic bomb
After defeating Nazi Germany there was only one step for the United States to end World War II and achieve world peace. The U.S. had to make the Japanese Empire surrender. The U.S. armed forces had already devastated the Japanese and conquered Japanese territories of Iwo Jima, Okinawa, and Japanese-held Luzon at a very high casualty rate. The last effort to make Japan surrender was to invade the mainland. This was going to be a very difficult task since Japan still had a relatively intact army of two million men in the mainland, the support of the Fifth Air Fleet of dedicated kamikaze pilots, and a 28 million Patriotic Citizens Fighting Corps. Invading mainland Japan would cost the U.S. a high number of casualties and the destruction of many ships, in addition to thousands of allied prisoners that were ordered by the Japanese High Command to be executed if the invasion was to occur. The casualties for the Japanese would run into the millions, including civilians. All these aspects contributed to the decision of the use of the atomic bomb to make Japan surrender. During this time the knowledge about the effects of the use of an atomic bomb was limited. The decision by the U.S. to use the newly developed atomic bomb to force Japan to surrender changed the outcome of the War. The use of the atomic bomb helped save millions of lives versus the amount of casualties that the invasion of the Japanese mainland would have yielded.
According to the files collected by the College of Public and Urban Affairs from Portland State University, Operation Downfall was the selected course of action by the United Sates for the invasion of mainland Japan. Downfall consisted of two parts: Operation Olympic and Operation Coronet. Had the U.S executed Operation Downfall, it would have added at least one year of military operations within Japan and have resulted in thousands of casualties for the allies and millions for the Japanese. In the Operation Downfall several estimates exist about the expected number of U.S. casualties; out of all the estimates only the study conducted for the Secretary of War takes into consideration a high involvement of the Japanese population. Estimates for the first 30 days of each sub operation varies, the most moderate suggests that the casualties would be 23,00 men and the highest estimate suggests that casualties would have reached 49,000 men. The study conducted for the Secretary of War for the complete execution of Downfall estimated 1.7 to 4 million American casualties, with the Japanese fatality ranging from 5 to 10 million including civilians. Regardless of the differences in the expected casualty rates from different studies, they were all immensely high for both sides. Executing Operation Downfall would result in the loss of millions of lives from both sides. Then an option emerged that could greatly reduce the number of casualties and the length of military operations in the Pacific theater. According to the Reports of General MacArthur’s in “The Campaigns of MacArthur in the Pacific”, military officials did not know about the existence of the atomic bomb before drafting and estimating casualties for Operation Downfall, “The plans for ‘Downfall’ were first developed early in 1945 by the Combined Chiefs of Staff at the Argonaut Conference held on the tiny island of Malta in the Mediterranean. On 9 February.” (396). Shalom claims in his article, “The Obliteration of Hiroshima” in New Politics Shalom wrote, “They exaggerated not only the invasion costs” (par 28) here Shalom tries to argue that the invasion costs were inflated to justify the use of the atomic bomb, which is not true since the plan and estimates were drafted before the knowledge that such a bomb was available for military use.
The possibility of using the atomic bomb provided the U.S. an opportunity to reduce casualties and to force Japan to surrender. The explosive effects of the atomic bomb are equivalent to thousands of tons of dynamite, which provides a higher output of destruction when compared to conventional bombs. The radiation effects of the bomb on the environment and on people were not well understood by the scientific community at this time, but they knew that it would definitely cause damage. They provided estimates of the range of radiation fallout. One example of the ignorance the U.S. had in regards to the effects of radiation can be observed on a memorandum by Major General L.R. Groves to the Chief of Staff about procedures after the detonation of the bomb. He stated, “We think we could move troops through the area immediately preferably by motor but on foot if desired.” This clearly shows the little knowledge military officials had about the long lasting effects of radiation
In the article, “Obliteration of Hiroshima” Shalom claims, “High Japanese civilian casualties are often blamed on the fanaticism of Japanese resistance. Some of this fanaticism was a myth propelled by racist U.S. stereotypes and carefully constructed Japanese government propaganda”. This is a contradiction to the reality of what was happening in Japan. According to Operation Downfall, the standards drafted for the Japanese Patriotic Citizens Fighting Corps, which was created for the defense of the Japanese home islands, “included all healthy men aged 15-60” (5) but in Kildare Dobbs “The Shatterer of Worlds” where he tells the story of a young Japanese girl named Emiko in Hiroshima during the bombing, he writes, “Tetsuro, Emiko’s thirteen year-old brother, was at Manchurian front with Imperial Army.” (1.) At the end of Emiko’s account, he writes, “Tetsuro had been killed in action in Manchuria.” (4) This is a clear example that the Japanese were ready to sacrifice boys as young as 13 years of age for the Japanese conquered territories. What would the Japanese be willing to sacrifice for their homeland? According to Operation Downfall, an account exists about a young girl mobilized who was issued an awl said: “Even killing one American soldier will do. …You must aim for the abdomen.” (qtd in Operation Downfall.) For the previous mentioned reasons, it is important to consider that the estimates concluded by the study for the Secretary of War in Operation Downfall could be considered very accurate, “conquering Japan would cost 1.7 to 4 million American casualties, including 400,000 to 800,000 fatalities, and five to ten million Japanese fatalities. The key assumption was large-scale participation by civilians in the defense of Japan.” (7-8). In Paul Fussell’s article, “Thank God for Atom the Bomb” he describes that thousands of allied prisoners that would have been executed by orders of the Japanese High Command if the invasion of the mainland would have been executed (4).
The use of the atomic bomb helped saved millions of lives, not only American service members and Japanese soldiers and civilians: but it also saved the lives of thousands of allied prisoners held by the Japanese. Regardless of the bombardments made by the U.S. prior to the use of the atomic bomb, the bomb also helped the Japanese by leaving some of the infrastructure of Japan working, which would help the Japanese on the reconstruction of their country. If Operation Downfall would have been executed, that would have meant the destruction of the vast majority of the Japanese infrastructure. Facts have been provided regarding the actions that the Japanese were willing to sacrifice in order to protect their homeland. At the same time, the use of the bomb allowed the scientific community to learn about the effects that the atomic bomb produced on the environment and the effects when used on a civilian population.

Works Cited
College of Public Affairs. “Operation Downfall: Planned Invasion of the Islands of Japan in World War II” (PDF) Portland State University. Web 23 Oct. 2012
Dobbs, Kildare. “Shatterer of Worlds.” Reading the Time. 1960. Bert Dill: English Grossmont College. Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District. Web. 29 Aug. 2009.
Fussell, Paul. “Thank god for the Atomic Bomb.” Thank God for the Atomic Bomb and Other Essays. New York: Summit Books, 1988. Ian Binnington Faculty Home Page. Eastern Illinois University. n.d. web. 4 Jan. 2009.
General MacArthur’s general Staff. “Reports of General MacArthur” The Campaigns of MacArthur in the Pacific. Tokyo 1950. Department of the Army. Vol.1. 2 Vols. Web. 23 Oct 2012.
The Manhattan Engineer District. “The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.” Center for Digital Discourse and Culture. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Web 23 Oct. 2012
United States. White House. “April 25, 1945” (PDF) “The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II” George Washington University. National Security Archive, Web 23 Oct. 2012
---. “Combined Chiefs of Staff Estimate of the Enemy Situation (as of July 6 1945)” 8 July 1945 (PDF) “The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II” George Washington University. National Security Archive, Web 23 Oct. 2012
---. “Memorandum discussed with the President April 25, 1945” (PDF) “The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II” George Washington University. National Security Archive, Web 23 Oct. 2012
---. “Memorandum for the Secretary of War Atomic Fission Bombs” 23 April 1945 (PDF) “The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II” George Washington University. National Security Archive, Web 23 Oct. 2012
----. “Memorandum to the Chief of Staff” 30 July 1945 (PDF) “The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II” George Washington University. National Security Archive, Web 23 Oct. 2012
---. “Minutes of Meeting Held at the White House on Monday, 18 June 1945 at 1530” 18 June 1945 (PDF) “The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II” George Washington University. National Security Archive, Web 23 Oct. 2012
Stephen R. Shalom. “The Obliteration of Hiroshima” New Politics 6:1 n. pag. (1996) Stephen R. Shalom faculty home page. William Paterson University. 2006. Web. 23 Oct. 2012

Cited: College of Public Affairs. “Operation Downfall: Planned Invasion of the Islands of Japan in World War II” (PDF) Portland State University. Web 23 Oct. 2012 Dobbs, Kildare Fussell, Paul. “Thank god for the Atomic Bomb.” Thank God for the Atomic Bomb and Other Essays. New York: Summit Books, 1988. Ian Binnington Faculty Home Page. Eastern Illinois University. n.d. web. 4 Jan. 2009. The Manhattan Engineer District. “The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.” Center for Digital Discourse and Culture. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Web 23 Oct. 2012 United States ---. “Combined Chiefs of Staff Estimate of the Enemy Situation (as of July 6 1945)” 8 July 1945 (PDF) “The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II” George Washington University. National Security Archive, Web 23 Oct. 2012 --- ---. “Memorandum for the Secretary of War Atomic Fission Bombs” 23 April 1945 (PDF) “The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II” George Washington University. National Security Archive, Web 23 Oct. 2012 ---- ---. “Minutes of Meeting Held at the White House on Monday, 18 June 1945 at 1530” 18 June 1945 (PDF) “The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II” George Washington University. National Security Archive, Web 23 Oct. 2012 Stephen R

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Invading the mainland of Japan would cause more American soldiers’ and Japanese soldiers’ lives. Instead of suffering from losing thousands of hundreds of soldiers, Truman decided to drop the bombs. Nevertheless, Japanese civilians would be implicated if the Allies invaded. According to the Battle of Saipan, “Hirohito sent out an imperial order encouraging the civilians of Saipan to commit suicide” (Wikipedia), and 1000 civilians committed suicide by jumping off the cliff when they actually were promised to have meals and be protected by the US marines. Plus, the longer the war lasts, the more supplies were required. The bombs saved soldiers, time and supplies overall at that time. President Truman was…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this essay I will discuss the reasons for and against whether America was right to drop the two atomic bombs. These two bombs were unloaded on Hiroshima, 6th August 1945, and attempted to hit Nagasaki, 9th August 1945. America gave the two bombs code names, the one that was dropped on Hiroshima was called ‘Little Boy’. This bomb was made of uranium. The final death toll added up to 135,000. The nuclear bomb that fell on Nagasaki was called ‘Fat Man’. This bomb was made of plutonium. The final death toll was about 70,000. This was because the bomb had missed its allocated target and instead fell into a valley.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On January 30th, 1995 Martian Harwit, the National Air and Space Museum, or NASM, director, announced the cancelation of the exhibit “The Last Act: The Atomic Bob and the End of World War II.” This exhibit was at the center of a yearlong controversy about the Enola Gay, the United States Air Force B-29 bomber that dropped the atomic bomb known under the code name “Little Boy” on the Japanese city Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. This act was known as the act that ended World War II and saved the lives of many American soldiers that otherwise were to invade Japan. Paul Tibbets, the pilot of the Enola Gay sated that the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was a “peace keeper…the harbinger of a cold war kept form getting hot.”2 While others believe that it was the beginning of a new holocaust due to it killing over 200,000 people, most of them civilians, not to mention the long term illnesses…

    • 2317 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    BREAKING NEWS- President Truman had been warned about invading Japan, and the terrific casualties they were capable off. However since they were afraid of attacking our soil, he ordered for a weapon large enough and powerful enough in hopes of bringing this all to an end. On August 6th, 1945 a five ton-bomb was dropped in the city of Hiroshima, Japan. The bombing killed 80,000 people; the city wasn’t left in great shape as well. Although the devastating outcome, we believe that this is the last of the feuding between them and us. (P.2, http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/atomic-bomb-dropped-on-hiroshima). The atomic bombs are scary, and threating to all nations. Sadly we believe this has both ended problems we have been facing, but also…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In August of 1945, the United States launched two atomic bombs on Japan; the first, in Hiroshima on August 6, and the second in Nagasaki a few days later. Despite the obvious diplomatic advantage to implementing one of the most intimidating weapons of that time, the United States’ tactics and goals behind dropping the atomic bombs were purely military oriented; the political benefit was merely an added bonus. The atomic bomb was necessary due to the Japanese’s refusal to surrender and the hundreds of thousands of lives at stake.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped the first ever Atomic weapon on Hiroshima, Japan. 140,000 people lost their lives, most of which were civilians. President Truman was in charge of this major decision, and he made the correct choice. The alternative solutions were much too costly for the United States, both in expenses and American casualties. Another reason Truman’s decision is justified was due to the declination of the fair ultimatum recieved by Japan. Also it was important to the well being of the world to keep the Soviets out of Japan. Dropping the Atomic Bomb was the most reliable and definite way to end the war.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Compton, Karl T. "If the Atomic Bomb Had Not Been Used." Atlantic Monthly 1946: 54-56. Web. 7 Mar. 2013.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The two sources selected for evaluation, Code-Name Downfall: The Secret Plan to Invade Japan-And Why Truman Dropped the Bomb by Thomas B. Allen and Norman Polmar and Downfall: The End of the Imperial Japanese Empire by Richard B. Frank are evaluated for their origins, purposes, limitations, and values.…

    • 2170 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twenty years after Harry Truman ordered the dropping of the atomic bomb, scholars and citizens subscribed to the original version of the story: the President acted to avoid the invasion of Japan and lose anywhere from 200,000 to 500,000 American lives. Then in 1965, Gar Alperovitz published a the book “Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam”. He argues that the dropping of the atomic bomb “was not needed to end the war or to save lives” but was a message to the Soviet Union. Fifty years after the atomic bomb was dropped, Alperovitz said that the final answer to why the atomic bomb was dropped is “neither essential nor possible”. He also said,”What is important is whether, when the bomb was used, the President and his top advisers understood that it wa not required to avoid a long and costly invasion, as they later claimed and as most Americans still believe.” Alperovitz believes that if the bomb was not used, Japan might still have been made to surrender before the first American landing on the island of Kyushu.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The atomic bomb shouldn’t have been used in World War 2 to defeat Japan. America could have used other alternatives then the deadly atomic bomb. President Truman should of waited a few more weeks for russia to declare war on Japan. The thought of invasion by both of America and Russia probably had an even more scared effect on the Japanese government then the Atomic Bombs. America could of also continue the conventional bombings and blockade.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By dropping the atomic bomb, we were able to put an end to a war that could have continued for many more years. Though there was much controversy over the bomb, Truman, our president at the time, apprised America saying he was quite thankful for it and celebrated the scientific achievements of the minds that created it. America was the first country to create something of this caliber and he wanted us to realize how great it was. The pragmatic decision helped America to establish its military power on a global scale. It is believed that Japan did not believe that we had a weapon that could cause so much destruction, so we had no choice but to show them. The Japanese people do not believe in surrendering, they see it as dishonorable and are…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In august of 1945, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a questionable decision by Harry Truman, the president of The United States of America. Throughout the years, it has been a heated debate in terms of whether the decision was morally correct and justified. Historians have analyzed and presented many arguments. In this short essay, I will attempt to expand on how historians feel about the decision by Truman to use atomic bombs. The revisionists bring into perspective and question the motivations of Harry Truman claiming he had more on his agenda than just the war. In my opinion, the decision to use atomic bombs was somewhat justified because if looked at statistically, the death toll with an invasion would have been higher and Truman…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Three...two...one…¡#@%^! Instantly, 80,000 are dead (Hall). Near the end of World War II on August 6th of 1945, American B-29 aircraft Enola Gay dropped the world’s first atomic bomb, ‘Little Boy,’ on the unsuspecting city of Hiroshima, Japan. Tens of thousands of civilians were instantly killed from the explosion and as time passed, the death toll almost doubled due to exposure to radiation and other aftereffects from the bomb (LeMay & Tibbets). To this day, historians debate over very controversial ideas concerning the attack. Many people justify the use of the nuclear bombs by reasoning that the attack was what broke Japan’s spirit and ended the war. Consequently, one of the debates is over whether or not the Japanese surrendered as…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japans army was too strong for the United States to invade. That is why they chose to drop the bombs. The american soldiers were very tired from four years of fighting the war. Japan had two million soldiers waiting for an invasion to happen. There is no way the war would have ended without the bombings.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The propaganda taught in grade schools was that the United States dropped the atomic bomb to save American lives and end the war. President Truman and some advisors stated after the war, that somewhere between five hundred thousand to one million American lives would be loss with an invasion of the Japanese homeland (37). So, in an attempt to bring the War in the Pacific to an end they used the atomic bomb. They also justified the use of the atomic bomb by claiming using the bomb would save an untold number of Japanese lives. The information which came from President Truman and his administrative sounded sensible and salved the conscious of America, but was it the truth? In his book, historian J. Samuel Walker provides a step by step analysis of events leading to Truman’s use of the atomic bomb to bring World War II to closure and extensive coverage of the relationship of the United States and the U.S.S.R.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays