Preview

Lincoln And The Second American Revolution Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
523 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lincoln And The Second American Revolution Summary
The American Civil War, a war that had its origin in the issue of slavery, occurred from 1861 to 1865. In his book, Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution, James M. McPherson considered the civil war as the Second American Revolution because of the changes it brought about in regards to slavery in the Unites States. In this event, revolution can be defined as the overthrowing of a current system of governing for a new and better system, what also happened on the First American Revolution. In the book, McPherson wrote that Charles A. Beard, one of the most influential American historians in the history, argued that the overthrow of slavery was an economic and capitalist revolution because the war happened as the result of a class conflict between a Yankee capitalist and a southern planter aristocracy. The book also discussed Lincoln’s position regarding the civil war in that he was at first conservative about the efforts of war against slavery but then shifted to a radical position. Lincoln’s change of position was caused by the also changing circumstances around the war. Some states seceded from the Union to form the Confederate that was proslavery, which made Lincoln think …show more content…

Before the war, liberty was associated with property in that for you to have liberty or independence you must have property to make you nondependent on anyone else. At the time, most the people who own property were mostly whites and blacks were considered dependent on whites since the whites were their masters. After the war, slavery was abolished, and Lincoln denounced the idea that you need property to be liberated, and removed the property qualifications for voting. The racial equality caused by the war constitute a shift from a negative to a positive concept of freedom because before the war, freedom was associated with freedom of the whites, whereas, after, it is freedom for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the next couple of paragraphs, Lincoln shifts his views from talking about the war to setting the two opposing sides equal to each other. By using parallel structure…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author also observes that Lincoln’s moderation in attitude continued to influence his presidency through the Civil War. He believed that calming nonconformist ideas and restoring legal authority throughout the nation were his main objectives. Foner displays his opinion in saying that in the early stages of war abolition wasn’t a priority for Lincoln, but a bargain that encouraged the reunification of the United States. As well as avoiding the slavery question, the President was enticing the border states with offers of reimbursed emancipation. Foner puts emphasis on the fact that as Lincoln's perspective on the pending issues change, his view adopted a new position that were previously held by abolitionists and Radical…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author James M McPherson discerns Lincoln's character in the transfiguration shaped by the Civil War. This book “Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution”. Contains seven thoughtful chapters that explains the emancipation of countless slaves, also the rebellion of the community and governmental command of the South. The Civil War was the utmost changing and significant involvement in the history of United States of America, then Abraham Lincoln keeps being the greatest legend character.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. Why does Lincoln in the “House Divided” speech believe the pro-slavery side was winning regarding the expansion of slavery in the territories? Why does Calhoun in opposing the Compromise of 1850 think the South was at a disadvantage? Because starting the new year of 1854 found slavery excluded from more than half the States by State Constitutions, and from most of the National territory by Congressional prohibition. Four days later, commenced the struggle which ended in repealing that Congressional prohibition. This opened all the National territory to slavery, and was the first point gained…… Although each side received benefits, the north seemed to gain the most. The North had absolute control over the government. The South…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The novel focuses on the south and its impact based on during, and after the Civil War. With the Union victory from not only their military strength or their advantages, but because they had help from anti-Confederates who lived in the border states of Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Delaware. The anti-Confederates consisted of blacks and whites who disliked the Confederates goal, they supplied people and useful resources to aid the Union with their victory. Furthermore, the south needed to try to secure their victory, they tore down bridges, railroads, and telephone lines. With this they were able to block incoming Union troops. The Union with its recent election of president Abraham Lincoln sought after the Emancipation Proclamation, which would secure freedom to slaves in the North and the South.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Civil War was a decisive and important part of American history. The north and south had radically different ideas of the direction the country should take and tension had reached a boiling point. The two different viewpoints can be seen in speeches made by John Smith Preston and Abraham Lincoln. John Preston’s speech to the Virginia state legislature outlined the south’s viewpoint and reasons for seceding while Abraham Lincoln’s first Inaugural Address outlined why the south could not succeed and his duties as president.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    All the reasons have a tendency, in the author's point of view, to point to the Republican administration of the Union on the need for drastic change in the leadership of military operations, and the general approach to military and domestic policies. This is especially true of the President Lincoln, whose authority grew, and the government during the war was almost unlimited. The political analysis of the situation of the war years provided throughout the book is not the key purpose of the author of 1861: The Civil War Awakening. The real aim of Goodheart (2011) is to present it fluently as it would be frivolous and arrogant in relation to this complex, multi-dimensional process. To understand the situation of those difficult years, to understand a complex set of problems which confronted Lincoln and his administration, is possible only if a reader grasps as much as possible, in order to break through…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincoln Summary

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The book Abraham Lincoln, written by James M. McPherson, constitutes not only Abraham Lincoln’s life, but also his remarkable presidency. Abraham Lincoln was the sixteenth president of the United States. He also was considered a peacemaker because his passion was to follow God’s law and create every man to be equal. During Lincoln’s first term of presidency in 1860-1864, he followed his passion by abolishing slavery, otherwise known as the Thirteenth Amendment. Following his first term, his second term’s goal is now known as the Fifteenth Amendment. To say the least, McPherson argues the brilliancy of Abraham Lincoln’s ideas and the colossal contribution Lincoln had regarding the United States of America.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many conflicts contributed to the Civil war, but the most famous and well known one was slavery which happened around in the mid 1800s. The conflict consisted of the Northern and southern states. Each side had their own view on slavery as south used it heavily for their economic structure while North barely used it. In conclusion both had different views on whether the expand or stop slavery growth growth or to have slavery at all.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many myths surround the American civil war including one that tells us Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves with just a movement of his pen. But was it him who went into war with millions of soldiers? The military were the ones who did everything they could to help free the slaves. Although Abraham Lincoln did issue the emancipation proclamation, it only freed slaves on paper but he did not go fight the war to actually free the slaves. He was pushed by the logic of winning the war against the confederacy, so he issued the emancipation proclamation.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincoln’s star shined when his administration took place during the Civil War proving excellency in both politically and rhetorically. From that war the 16th president got his most famous nick name as the Great Emancipator that dwells between Americans till the present day. However, history doesn’t say quit the same about the complete representation of Abraham Lincoln’s attitude towards the war and even the issue of slavery. Such a title proposes an acceptance that the civil war was a war for abolishing slavery and freeing the slaves under the lead of a free man who is motivated by the moral code of equality between blacks and whites. The sentiment about slavery was totally different than today’s. Slaves were private property and not even considered as human beings who have lost rights as Americans. Actually, slaves were a joker in the pack to both Northerners and Southerners. Saying all this make the slavery issue seems the cover of the civil war. Therefore, the goal of this chapter’s second section is to examine whether slavery was used only as a front image to fulfil a higher aim and securing the country from the danger that disturbed it with the threat of dissolving the union.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 4, 1865, Lincoln presented himself to the public to deliver his speech; days before the Civil War came to the end. Lincoln’s anguish is displayed as he summarized the events that led to the Civil War. Trust was destroyed between the North and South and Lincoln was left with a nation in turmoil fighting over slavery. He reminded the people that they were one nation, not two independent nations warring against each other. He did not want to throw accusations to one side and chose to show the common qualities each side had in each time period. In doing this, he forced the people to widen their mind and consider the other side’s perspective. He did not want the sides to continue fighting and wanted to create a common ground and impacted…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The American civil war was primarily a fight between two sides over numerous contradictory ideals. The civil war’s seeds started to grow when Abraham Lincoln was elected President of the United States of America which in turned caused tensions to rise. Unlike the peaceful ending of the Mexican Revolution, the American Civil War ended with the Battles of Palmito Ranch and Appotmax and the capture of Confederate President Davis. The end of this long, bloody conflict helped add three new amendments to the Constitution. Finally, the result of the American Civil War answered whether the United States would be an undividable country and whether it was truly…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Real Lincoln

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages

    DiLorenzo makes the readers understand many major points; one being that Lincoln permitted the horrible and everlasting Civil War to occur. According to the book, Lincoln left nonmilitary legislation to concentrate on the battle and by not allowing any residents in the North withdraw or retire from their part in the war. “Lincoln famously micromanaged the war effort, and the burning of the entire Southern towns was an essential feature of his war strategy” (DiLorenzo, 7). Many thought that Lincoln’s role in the war against the North and the South was trying to centralize the two, but in reality he tore the two apart day by day. During this time, many other countries abolished slavery, which proves DiLorenzo’s point that Lincoln could have carried on the trend to the US just as easily. Lincoln just wanted to create a ware to avoid the topic of slavery and he states so in the book:…

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The American Revolution was a time of great change in the world. The biggest empire in the world, Great Britain, was being heckled by its American colonies and had to go overseas with troops to take care of it. The American colonists split up into three sides when the war started, the Patriots, the Loyalists, and the Fence-Sitters. The American Revolution was as much a civil war as it was a war against a foreign nation (Tindall, Shi 236). The Patriots and Loyalists both lived in the American colonies but often found themselves in conflict with each other, and that is why it can be considered a civil war. The American Revolution was a time of change, and two sides stood up for what they believed in. Patriots and Loyalists…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays