Preview

LINCOLN The Conspirator Movie

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1828 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
LINCOLN The Conspirator Movie
The Conspirator Movie

Key Notes

The film starts out at Ford’s theater, downtown D.C. where President Lincoln, Vice President Andrew Johnson and Secretary of State William H. Seward are attending a play.
Lewis Powell and David herald try to kill Secretary of State William H. Seward, but are unsuccessful and only stab him and his son.
George Atzerodt was to kill the vice president but we seem George at the bar taking shots, not being able to carry it out and walks out of the theater.
This is where we see John Wilkes Booth kill Lincoln from behind about four feet away. Jumping down from the balcony onto the stage saying "Sic semper tyranis!" as he ran off; That means "Thus always to tyrants!"
The film moves to Mary Surratt being put on trial for housing these assassins in her boarding house. Her son John Surratt escapes from the investigation going on. Frederick Aiken a lawyer is assigned to represent Mary Surratt in the trail, which, even he believes she is guilty. This trail is a Military tribunal. The impact of Lincoln’s assassination is leaving the nation struggling to find justice and wanting the people affiliated with his death killed.
There is very little evidence presented to find her 100% guilty.
Mary Surratt does not want to make her son look like a bad man, but saying this could show people she is not the one who is guilty but it’s her son. She only says they were not planning on killing Lincoln but kidnaping him and her son left the house three weeks before Lincoln’s death.
The lesson in the movie is about the Right to a Fair Trial and the right of due process and equal representation before the law as a basic human and constitutional right. But we see in a Military tribunal these can be ignored.
In this military tribunal of 10 officers listening to this case, only 4 find her guilty to be ‘hanged by the neck till dead’. The Attorney General thinks the country needs to see her still put to justice.
Her

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    April 15, 1865, 7:22 AM, President Abraham Lincoln is presumed dead by one of the many doctors surrounding his deathbed in the Petersen house. John Wilkes Booth is running away from Ford’s Theatre where he had assassinated the 16th President of the United States of America. This book, Manhunt: The 12-day Chase for Lincoln's Killer, by James L. Swanson, highlights what happens before and after the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. It shows the perspective of both the people of America and John Wilkes Booth as he attempts to escape D.C. officials. It goes into detail on why Booth murdered Lincoln, and how he survived without being caught for twelve days.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Wilkes Booth is the main man of this horrendous act. He himself shot and killed our 16th president Abraham Lincoln. The reason is clear on why I would not want to meet this man. I mean come on Mr. Lincoln was the best man. John killed Lincoln because Abe stopped slavery. Oh and when I say John did not like idea he did not like it one bit.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    At the front, the soldiers are sent to put up barbed wire. All of a sudden, there is an artillery attack and several men and horses are hit. One of the…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fort Hood Death Sentence

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A military jury sentenced Maj. Nidal Hasan to death for a 2009 shooting in Fort Hood, Texas. A death sentence for an army personal hardly ever happens. Maj. Nidal Hasan walked into a medical building where army soldiers were getting medical check-ups and shouted ‘Allahu akbar’ which means in Arabic for “God is great!.” He then opened fire with a laser-sighted handgun. He killed thirteen army men and women that day and injured over 30. When police finally stopped him they had shot him in the back leaving him paralyzed from the waist down. He went to court being his own attorney never denying killing his fellow soldiers and he opened his hearing with…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Steward was only injured while Johnson wasn’t even confronted. The plan to kidnap him in Ford’s Theater, I knew, wasn’t going to work because I had to ask myself one question: how am I going to kidnap the President of the United States in front of hundreds of people, especially when there was a Union major sitting right next to him? Lincoln was against everything I stood for. He was my enemy, and I could think of only one other option: kill!” he yelled.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Adams was asked to defend the soldiers and their captain in court the day after the shootings. The soldiers had the odds against them. They were in an American court, with an American judge, and an American jury. No one else was bold enough to take on case as precarious as this case was. McCullough went on to state that John accepted this case because he strongly believed that no man in a free country should be denied the right to counsel and a fair trial (92). Adams knew what troubles he was getting himself into taking on a case like this and the repercussions it had. It would not have been his first difficult case, as he took on a similar case that involved four American sailors killing a British naval officer in self-defense that boarded the American ship. The captain was given a separate trial from the soldiers. Adam’s argued that it couldn’t be proven whether or not the captain gave orders to fire, and with a virtuoso performance given by Adams, the captain was found not guilty.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John said his conspirators would be famous. John would pay them a lot of money. Abraham was the first president to get assassinated, more than one citizen told Abraham it is too dangerous to go because of his death treats. John Booth had helped and did not just kill the president. They tried to kill the Vice President and the Secretary Of State. The guard outside left his station to go to the bathroom then he decide to get a drink. When he came back and heard that the president was shot and he snuck past the White House footman (Steers). They found four guilty and had them hung but let the other four go, the guard that went to the bathroom went to trial. John Wilkes Booth died from a soldier shooting him in the neck his last words were “Tell my mother I did it for my country (“John Wilkes…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hidden

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The essay “He Would Never Hurt a Fly: War Criminals on Trial in The Hague”…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The law of Habeas Corpus was created to permit the guilty to present their case in court and to be tried fairly. In today 's war on terror, the amount of such enemy combatants who were detained indefinitely without any trial has raised. The courts are split up on following the law by the letter or to practically change it according to the situation 's needs. I feel it 's necessary to follow these laws in the same context in which they were written, and the pragmatic approach leaves room for reckless changes. To deny an enemy combatant his or her day in court cannot be justified as taking the pragmatic approach in dealing with war criminals. This paper is an attempt to present the state of law today towards war criminals and the implications of denying the basic right of Habeas Corpus to suspected terrorists.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Gods Must Be Crazy

    • 543 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Later on we see men of a terrorist called Semboca in an attempt to assassinate the president. Semboca and his men are followed throughout the movie by the counter terrorist forces until he and his men catch Mrs. Thompson, a lady who came to teach English, and the children she was teaching. From here on all the plots of the movie start to become more unified towards helping Mrs. Thompson and the children from the Semboca and the terrorists.…

    • 543 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    lincoln

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The plot of the story is set in January 1865, centered around Abraham Lincoln , who is played by Daniel Day Lewis. The president has just started his second term and the war is coming to an end. The film opens with a brief flashback to the Battle of Jenkins Ferry, it then cuts to Lincoln sitting down having a conversation with two free black soliders from the battle. One of the soliders tell Lincoln of how he wishes that all men would one day be created equally enough that a black man could one day be a colonel in the army. The second scene opens with a visualization of one of Lincoln’s recent dreams. Abraham & Mary Lincoln, who is played by Sally Field, have a discussion about this dream along with others and come to the conclusion that it is about the possibility of a new push for the proposed Thirteenth Amendment, abolishing slavery. Next we see a Cabinet meeting which turns to a discussion of the proposed Thirteenth Amendment that includes vigorous objections and other who also surprised Lincoln by saying that they will object against the plan, this causes Lincoln suspect defeat but he intends to continue onward. Chairman of the Ways & Means Committee, Stevens (played by Tommy Lee Jones) hosts a meeting of Radical Republicans to discuss their position on whether or not to hold a new vote for the proposed Thirteenth Amendment and what Lincoln's true intentions are. The Amendment passes in the senate and is then scheduled for the vote of the House of Representative at the end of the month.afris the president and his wife look for some democrats that they can have go on their side. The morning of the vote is January 31, 1865, Stevens…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Nuremberg Trials, Nazi officers who were being tried were stripped of various rights that are commonly found in today’s court system. One of these privileges is the right to appeal to a higher court, such as the Supreme Court, when you do not agree with the overall outcome of your case. During the Nuremberg Trials, the ruling was final, leaving no room for authoritative question. In addition, Nazi officials did not have access to profound human rights lawyers. Rather, they were given Nazi lawyers who were “seconded by the occupying authorities,” which means that they were provided with lawyers who were approved by higher authorities but were also disregarded by the British, the Americans, the Russians, and the French. This inherently meant that those who were tried were subjected to a rather unfair and biased trial. This completely contrasts today’s court system in which criminals have the right to lawyers who are more diligent and better suited in defending their clients, granting them a better chance at a lighter…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The year is 1945: 6 million people have just been exterminated due to their religion. Countless more have been killed, injured, or emotionally wounded. This act cannot go on unnoticed, this crime cannot go on without justice. Together, four major world powers unify and take course against a genocide felt throughout the world. The four powers come forth with the idea to hold a series of trials. After careful thought, America, France, Russia, and England chose Nuremberg to hold the trials. With a location set and a course of action, the powers now had to build their case in the Nuremberg Trials, a series of thirteen trials held with the purpose of bringing Nazi criminals to justice after WWII.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuremberg Trial Justice

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Directly contradicting the trial’s convictions against human rights and wartime law is the superior orders theory. German doctrines have been proven to have directly contradicted the international standards of the Hague Convention, allowing civilian abuse if it will further the war’s agenda. The German soldiers and officers were acting under the direct orders of their respective commanders, under penalty of exile or death. A logical course of thought would not lead a…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A ‘Prisoner of War’ is a person, whether combatant or non-combatant, who is held in custody by an enemy power during or immediately after an armed conflict. The treatment of prisoners has always been matter of debate in the world and many declarations and resolutions have been made in this regard including Geneva Convention of 1949. War is a time of confusion and while many suffer from it, there are many who benefit in the fog of it. The military personnel, whenever caught, have to be treated as PsOW and they have certain rights and privileges. The enemy always utilizes this opportunity to the fullest and employs certain obvious and hidden methods to extract information from the PsOW.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays