Preview

Living vs. Dead Constitution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
324 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Living vs. Dead Constitution
Unit 1 Essay (Living v. Dead Constitution)

The founders intended for the Constitution of the United States to be a document that would aid in protecting the rights of the American people while also developing a federal government. It is my opinion, Mr. President, that when choosing our next Supreme Court Justice that you choose a nominee that has a view of the United States Constitution as a “dead document” to protect what the founders worked hard to set in place.
When reading the Bible, for example, we read the books in a literal sense. We are not taking what is said and misconstruing the information to form what suits our lifestyles and ideals best. The same should be done with the Constitution. It is dangerous to try to reform, replace, or realign the rights of the American people by taking out of context what is written in the Constitution. For example, Kelo v. New London, 545 US 469 - Supreme Court 2005, was a case in which the Supreme Court took the words “public use” used in the Constitution and distorted them to “public benefit” for economic development. The land was taken from the owner by the government and turned over to a private developer.1 This is not what the forefathers meant. The forefathers put this in place for the development of roads, schools, libraries, and other public facilities and not for private development that they believe will boost economic development.
In summary, I believe it is in the best interest of the people of the United States of America that the nominee for Supreme Court Justice is one that supports the Constitution as a “dead document”. The Constitution has been protecting the citizens of the United States for over 200 years, and far be it from us to change what is not broke.

1. “Americapedia, Kelo v. New London (2005)” Bill of Rights Institute, 2013,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In this essay, Tribe and Dorf describe our nation’s Constitution as a document that continues to dynamically work to achieve a balance between governmental power and individual liberty. Founding fathers like Madison and Jefferson also look to the constitution as a distinct outline, instead of a blueprint. The amendments and bills that comprise it tend to be very vague and open to interpretation of what some definitions actually mean. This leads to a lot of disputes throughout history of what the Constitution and its words stand for.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United states constitution is meant to serve as guide lane for all states for all states where the document is meant only to provide a basic structure to the government, and all decisions on meaning are to be interpreted by the Judiciary branch. As said by "J. Harvie Wilkinson III" "Americans…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787, the members of the Federal Convention knew that the Articles of Confederation were severely lacking what was essential for a successful government and nation. Knowing this, the convention looked to the past to construct a constitution for a young and ever changing country. The Founding Fathers’ were influenced by the Romans, the English and many others along the way, hoping that they would be more successful at producing liberty, order, and justice. The result is the long standing Constitution that has guided America and the government through the founding to present day.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When writing the Constitution of 1787, the writers endeavored to create an aristocracy with elites continuing their governmental control. Looking through the newly proposed Government structures, Congress and the President possessed an excessive amount of power over both the states and the American people. Although many Americans, such as Patrick Henry and Mercy Otis Warren, voiced their oppositions to these new propositions, Congress ratified the Constitution of 1787. Although the Government today assumes similar power opportunities as in the Constitution of 1787, the current Constitution also includes the Bill of Rights, which prevents the Government from impeding the people’s rights and prohibits the excessive assumption of power. However,…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For decades, historians have debated the purpose of the United States Constitution. Some, such as Charles Beard claim that the constitution is an economic document meant to secure power in the hands of the wealthy. Others, most notably Henry Commager have challenged Beard’s analysis and claim that the Constitution was drafted with political motives instead. To make his point, Beard primarily discusses the writers of the constitution, and only assumes what the document itself will say. Commager makes a more convincing argument since he uses both the Constitution itself and the framers’ words as evidence.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans view the Constitution as the Holy Grail to guide our country and provide meaning of the law. It also gives a designation of powers to each branch and the states. Our essential freedoms are specified to us by the Constitution and have been stripped away from some individuals based on their sexual preference. In the Lawrence v. Texas case, it proves that the Supreme Court is continually re-interpreting the Constitution.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our founding father, Patrick Henry, said, “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government — lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.” Our founding fathers created a strong government for the people of the United States in order to protect their rights. They established a framework that our contemporary government is supposed to adhere to. Today, the American government has drifted away from the ideas embedded in our Constitution. The contemporary American government fails to work the way our founding fathers intended because of the representative government we have today.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Document 1 the author says, “Let us look and [see] the [problems that exist] in every part of our country . . . the complaints of our farmers . . . the complaints of every class of [people who loan money] . . . the [sad] faces of our working people . . . our ships rotting in our harbors . . . the insults that are [made against America] in every court in Europe”. The author who was a supporter of the Constitution being ratified talks about how many problems that the United States has under the current Constitution and he feels that the only way the problems can be solved is too ratify the Constitution. George Washington feels that people thought that they knew too much about how a confederation works when the first…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution is a plan for government and was written in 1787. Our society is constantly changing, so our constitution needs to also. The role of government is to protect us and they can’t do that with a constitution that isn’t fit for our daily life. The constitution doesn’t support a strong central government. There are corrupt officials, growing population, and it is outdated.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution is arguably one of the most important documents in the United State’s history. It provided a stable foundation upon which to build the country’s government. However, it does not stop there. The Constitution solidified the inalienable rights of the American people and united a nation that was on the brink of destruction.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I still remember being in an eighth grade U.S. History class back in my junior high years. One distinct memory of that course, perhaps the most memorable of all the projects we had, came in the first month of the school year, in the curriculum’s first unit: the founding of the United States as its own nation. As the textbook timeline approached 1787 we prepared ourselves for a daunting task: memorize and recite the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution. We as students would wait anxiously as, one by one, each of our peers would step up to the front of the classroom and begin to recite from memory. Few people could recite the Preamble smoothly, but for those who stumbled, we all seemed to remember perfectly the first and last chunks: “We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union…” and “…do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” To us back in eighth grade, that missing middle section was just a group of words to be more-or-less forgotten the next day. To our forefathers, however, that middle section was vital in creating the basis for the supreme law of the United States.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The founding fathers did not want to repeat history. The constitution was established by the people, the founding fathers, in order to create the utmost effective government that would never fail as other nations have. Through much debate and discussion, the founding fathers decided to create a government in which the power is separated and within each division of power, it would act as…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is an important moment for delegates to decide whether or not to ratify The Constitution. This is an important moment in our countries history because the delegates are deciding how the government is going to work.Why we have created this document is because the Articles of Confederation aren't working, and people think that the constitution are not going to work either.The proposed will give us Constitution nothing but failure. The Constitution shouldn't be ratified because this form of government has never been tried, even by Great Britain, and it could destroy the country a lot worse then the Articles of Confederation, it not only will do that but, even with the risk, we will have all branches of government to be filled with the wealthy elite class of people. And for these reasons, I think we shouldn't ratify the Constitution.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American people have been known from the start for a strong Constitution created to protect the rights of their citizens. As culture evolved, our interpretation of the document has shifted with it, but the document itself and its fundamental concepts have not. The Constitution has protected the basic rights of all citizens, and has granted us certain privileges that allow us to uphold the democracy and the government that serves the people. Some of these include the right to vote and the ability of citizens to maintain their status.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution was adopted over 200 years ago and is still relevant today; it is widely debated whether the Constitution stands as a legal or living document. A living document is a document that evolves, changes over time, and adapts to new circumstances. The Constitution is a living document as it is open to constant change through the amendment process and is also undergoing interpretation by Congress; however, it is believed that the Constitution should be interpreted as it was originally written.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays