Preview

Mabo Case

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mabo Case
Legal studies-Law Reform
Legal studies-Law Reform

The Australian Legal System response to the Mabo case has changed greatly ever since the first time it was introduced. Many different acts were introduced and/or amended as a result of this case. The effectiveness of the law and the law reform in protecting the rights of individual and society at large is demonstrated throughout this essay.
Eddie Koiki Mabo was born on Murray Island in 1936 and was an Indigenous Australian. In 1974, during a conversation with two academics, Mabo became aware to the fact that his family did not own their traditional lands and that it was, in law, owned by the Crown. The Queensland Government wanted to remove any doubt that the Meriam people had total rights over the islands. So in 1985 it had the Parliament pass the Queensland Coast Islands Declaratory Act. This Act was to abolish any claims to title to the islands by the Murray Islanders. In 1981 a land rights conference was held at James Cook University where Mabo made a very important speech claiming land ownership and land inheritance in Murray Island. A lawyer attending the conference suggested that there should be a case to claim land rights through the court system and as a result, he along with others began a ten year journey to gain recognition of native title. Native title is the term used to identify the extent to which Australian Law recognises the prior rights and interests of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, under their own traditional laws, in relation to Australian land and waters. They took legal action against this Act, successfully arguing that the Act was contrary to the Racial Discrimination Act, and was therefore invalid. Further action was taken in the High Court to rightfully own the justice of the Meriam people declared.
The Native Title is effective in Mabo’s case in several ways as it recognises and protects the rights of native title in Australia. It provides for the validation of any



Bibliography: http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/abs@.nsf/Previousproducts/1301.0Feature%20Article21995?opendocument http://foundingdocs.gov.au/item-did-33.html http://www.mabonativetitle.com/tn_23.shtml http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mabo_v_Queensland_%28No_1%29 http://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/land/native-title.html http://www.hreoc.gov.au/social_justice/native_title/index.html http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/documents/explore/ResearchPublications/researchBulletins/rb0497bs.pdf http://www.aiatsis.gov.au/koorimail/issues/pdf/173.pdf

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mabo Legal Case Study

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    QLD government passes the Declaratoy Act to retrosepectively extinguish native title on QLD’s costal islands.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mabo Case Study Australia

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A question often Raised in regards to the Mabo case is whether the legal effects of the ruling have had a positive or negative effect on not only the legal system but also society as a whole.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    deem it timely from 1912 on to have aboriginals release the right to which they could lay claim"…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The sentencing judge found that it was established beyond reasonable doubt that the respondent, after finding out that Flick was pregnant, that the course of terminating the offspring by any means in his power, either consensual or otherwise was going to be taken and was part of his thought process during the course of Flicks pregnancy up to the events on the 20th of August 2002. Mens Rea in this case concerning a guilty mind in regards to King has been proven by the actions that led to the assault. It has been stated before the court that King sought an abortion upon the beginning of the pregnancy, determining his disagreement towards the life of the child, and his outlook towards the future of the pregnancy, also being emphasised during his conversations involving Jessica Williams and Brianne McCarthy offering them a payment of $500.00 if they would ‘bash’ Flick as long as it resulted in the death of the baby. His honour concluded that this course of actions was evident in his previous actions, therefore proving a guilty mind.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    MABO PRACTICE ESSAY PRIDE

    • 1055 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The 1992 Landmarks High Court case abolishing the doctrine of ‘Terra Nullius’; the foundation of Australia’s settlement paved way for the ‘Native Title Act 1993’. Following the 20 year commemoration of the Mabo decision, the 2012 telemovie ‘Mabo’ directed by Rachel Perkins was released. It depicts the life of Murray Islander man and activist Eddie Koiki Mabo and his family in his grueling fight for land rights. Pride comes before the fall – the ego of one stems destruction. Pride is a sense of satisfaction derived from one’s achievements. It is also a feeling of self-worth and dignity. Eddie is of Murray Island decent and this background stems a lot of pride. The Indigenous race have suffered from racist values of society and it is Eddie’s pride in his race that stems his battle for justice and equality.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mabo V State

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Doctrine of reception made the challenge of proving traditional ownership even more difficult unlike past cases such as the 1971 Gove land rights case. Murray Island was different Murray Island had distinct borders; it also had a mythical God called Malo (pronounced Mare). Malo is the source of Meriam heritage and culture. Malo can be seen as a form of Common Native Law. Land ownership, responsibilities; religious beliefs and ritual dances were all covered within Malo law providing the groundwork of an affective case against the state of Queensland. Malo has existed for as long as the Island and its Native People and was therefore a valid piece of evidence in both Mabo cases. Eddie Mabo was able to prove that land was passed down from father to son, generation to generation thanks to Malos law and tribal…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As times change, laws are forced to undergo change. This process is known as law reform and is done to suit today’s contemporary society. Australia has undergone various changes to its laws to suit society; however the effectiveness of such changes can be questionable. The issues revolving around native title and sexual assaults are still developing today in order to balance an individual’s rights and values.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mabo eal

    • 822 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The story film Mabo, in leading up to its supportive and motivated revolution in Australia's history, is assist by Eddie's family determination to win Eddie Mabo's land rights case and thus restore justice to indigenous people. The foundations of his familial and social assitance can be seen in his encounter with white authority and his later involvement in the union movement, as well as his role as political activist. In addition, key argument with influential figures also helps to motivate him to stick together with his family. Eddie's personal characteristics, partly born out of his early families supportive for respect, also influence his passion and determination to fight for better conditions for his people. Yet, arguably Eddie could not have achieve fame on his own-it is the support of his wife,Bonita, and the key advice of his legal team that ultimately propels him on his difficult legal path towards achieving recognition of past wrongs in relation to indigenous land ownership.…

    • 822 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Squirk

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This changed again in 1992 with the High Court judgement on the land mark Mabocase. Eddie Mabo was an Indigenous inhabitant of the Murray (Mer) Islands in the Torres Strait. He led a group of the Meriam people in a Supreme Court challenge against the Queensland government on the issue of land ownership. Their case stated;…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the back of the recent landslide referendum on the recognition of Aboriginal people in the national census, the Whitlam government greatly increased the social and political rights of first nation Australians. The government instituted a policy of ‘self-determination’ which decentralised decision making powers to indigenous communities. They allowed Aboriginals to claim land and brought more Indigenous voices into the policy making process. From the outset, Whitlam made Indigenous affairs a top priority for his government and indicated that justice had to be served in order for Australia to move forward as a country. The subsequent Fraser Government committed to continue these reforms. A powerful example Whitlam’s loyalty to this issue was in his remarks to an Aboriginal tribe where he declared Indigenous ownership of a Victorian river. Whitlam in his speech to the Gurindji people stated “these lands belong to the Gurindji people and I put into your hands this piece of the earth itself as a sign that we restore them to you and your children…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Mabo brought forth a new yet logical approach to land ownership within Australia through utilising the courts of Australia and it is with this that he and others brought forth a case to the high court of Australia. This case did not only affect Mabo’s land as it would affect all of the indigenous people’s right to land as with the passing of the case it would remove the once placed terra nullius on Australia and allow for aboriginals to once more take ownership of their land. This is evident in a news article from the time titled “Court's ruling destroyed idea of terra nullius” where it states, “The High Court found in favour of the Murray Islanders and overturned the doctrine accepted until then that Australia had been terra nullius”. Henceforth, the methods of Eddie Mabo challenged previously set out laws and regulations and compelled the high courts of Australia to modify it so that the aboriginals would have their rightful ownership of their…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At a ceremony in 1975, Gough Whitlam made a speech, and poured the soil into Lingiari’s hands, symbolizing the fact that the Aboriginals had their land back. "Vincent Lingiari, I solemnly hand to you these deeds as proof, in Australian law, that these lands belong to the Gurindji people and I put into your hands part of the earth itself as a sign that this land will be the possession of you and your children…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Explain why the adversary system of trial is the best system for achieving justice in criminal trials?…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mabo Decision was the outcome of the protest led by Eddie Mabo with a group of people from the Murray Islands in Torres Strait claiming that they had ownership of the islands before the white people settled. This act was very successful leading to the High Court deciding that the Murray Islanders were entitled to possession, occupation, enjoyment and use of the lands. The Mabo Decision overturned the concept of Terra Nullius (‘the land belonging to no one’) meaning the Australians recognised that the native title still…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Native title was not recognised in Australia until 1992 when the High Court in the Mabo decision overturned the doctrine of terra nullius. This led to the legislation of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and the establishment of the National Native Title Tribunal. Now Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders had the right to make native title claims but this was a very expensive, slow and time-consuming process making it ineffective for Indigenous people to regain ownership of their traditional land. The Native Title Amendment Act 1998 (Cth) also restricted the rights of Indigenous Australians.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays