Fact: Samantha Smith slipped and fell on spilled shampoo in the aisle at the grocery store in question. After we filed our complaint with the courts; the store alleges that Ms. Smith had a duty to avoid the spillage, but was too distracted by her son to notice. The store feels that Ms. Smith is just as much responsible as they are.…
This court case took place in the United States Supreme Court in the Northern District of Indiana. The plaintiff in this court case is Deborah White, represented by Amanda Babbitt and Jackson Walsh. The defendants are Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, represented by Benjamin Walton and Jordon Van Meter. Deborah White brought this court case to the Supreme Court in order to argue against the summary judgment filed by the defendents. A summary judgment is granted only if all of the written evidence before the court clearly establishes that there are no disputed issues of material fact and that the party who requested the summary…
Jodi Arias Trial: Day 2: 1 Of 2: Evidence Reviewed (No Sidebars). (2013). Retrieved from…
Was Cruz Estrada’s Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure violated when Officer Green grabbed Cruz Estrada’s purse from her shoulder and searched it without her consent, and can the evidence found in Cruz Estrada’s purse be suppressed due to the search being impermissible?…
the court did not have an interpreter available. Instead of holding off the hearing until the court…
ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR – List what was unfair about the arrest and first trial PG 3…
A court administrator is in charge of the day-to-day office duties that keep the courthouse smoothly running. These administrators need managerial and organizational skills in order to track information, manage processes and delegate tasks to employees. Court administrators work closely with judges and referees, but also supervise court staff who perform clerical and financial duties. Court administrators start out earning approximately $36,000 per year, but can end up making $96,000.…
Liberty University presented a case of White v. Gibbs which is about Mrs. Debbie White and Patrick Gibbs under the civil provisions of Indiana’s Dram Shop Act, Indiana Code 7.1-5-10-15.5. In this case Mrs. Debbie White sued Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. Because White and Gibbs do not live in the same states, the suit was brought in diversity in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. However, the suit will be decided under Indiana state law. The main goal of this courtroom is to argue the motion for summary judgment which is concerning the case of Mrs. Debbie White, Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. In this case, the plaintiff is Debbie White. Two moot court attorneys who are Amanda Babbitt and Jack Walsh represent Mrs. White. The defendants are Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. Also two other moot court attorneys who are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter represent the defendants which are Mr. Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern.…
The Court is where disputes are settled, law is born and where individuals accused of criminal crimes are held for trial and sent before a judge to determine their fate. Courts are simply the civilized way of handling an issue in a legal organized manner. It is a critical component of American justice system. Courts id defined by the book as, “An agency or unit of the judicial branch of government, authorized or established by statue or constitution, and consisting of one or more judicial officers, which has authority to decide upon cases, controversies in law, and disputed matters of fact brought before it.” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worral, 2011). There are four important functions or purposes of the court, Courts are to uphold the law, protect individuals, resolve disputes, and reinforce the social norms.…
The population in America is growing in leaps and bounds and the increase is not just white individuals that speak English. The fact that many Americans today do not speak English makes for a large problem and lack of communication in society. The court systems are no different. When there is a language barrier present in a court, this means that the individual before the judge will not understand or be understood. This makes it impossible for this person to receive a fair and speedy trial or experience before the court system. Not only are language barriers present, but the ability to bridge these gaps with an interpreter has also proven to be a problem as not all courts are equipped with translators at all times. The court administrator is the one who needs to train and educate court staff and stakeholders on the problems of language barriers and the lack of people to interpret different languages for the court system. The next step would be to train and certify interpreters to be present in the courts at all times. Collaboration and information sharing is also a big part of solving this problem. Without collaborating and communicating about this problem, nothing will change. Another method…
Within the U.S. each state has a court system with a lower court, an appellate court and a Supreme Court that functions similar to the Supreme Court of the U.S. Four levels exist within the State Court: The lower court also known as the court of limited Jurisdiction which represents the first level in which minor cases are seen. Citizens whom are accused of not paying parking fines, those accused of prostitution, DUI and those accused of disorderly conduct in public are also tried in this court.…
). The sources of US Law are important because they secure our general wellbeing, and guarantee our rights as natives against misuse by other individuals, by associations, and by the administration itself. We have laws to accommodate our general wellbeing. These exist at the neighborhood, state and national levels, and incorporate things such as laws that originate from the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution, that ensure our fundamental opportunities like the right to speak freely, religion, and the press. Laws that shield us from segregation in light of our race, sex, age, or due to an incapacity. In the United States, the Constitution is a definitive wellspring of the law. Be that as it may, it was never intended to address each particular…
As the gavel sounds there is silence in the courtroom. The Judge has made his final decision, and the outcome is life without the possibility of parole. The courtroom is filled with mixed emotions and the prosecution and family have a sense of justice, although the family of the perpetrator feels anguish. Criminal court is perceived as the place of justice where criminals are punished and the victims get closure. This is a simplistic view of how the criminal justice system works; in reality the process is more complicated.…
speak the language? How can race and language affect your trial? Is it systematically fair?…
the law is a guideline for human behavior. The law is merely a guideline for human behavior. The study of our justice system should be viewed as a cluster of ideas, principles, and values about which reasonable persons can and do disagree. Judicial opinions construe the constitutionality, meaning, and effect of constitutional and statutory provisions. Most individuals agree that the most basic goal of the criminal justice system is to protect society from crime. Criminal justice professionals are generally oriented toward one of two opposite goal law and order or individual rights. The pragmatic goals include the goal of preventing crime. Organizations have developed standards, which are detailed goals for improving the system. Although the criminal justice system is referred to as a system, it is more accurate to refer to it as a nonsystem. Two important questions regarding the burden of proof in criminal proceedings are: Who has the burden of proving an issue? and, What is the magnitude of the burden?The court system in the United States is based upon the principle of federalism. A dual system of state and federal courts exists today. Appellate jurisdiction is reserved for courts that hear appeals from both limited and general jurisdiction courts. In many states, the appeals from minor courts are heard de novo. The Judiciary Act of 1789 created the U.S. Supreme Court. Jurisdiction is the power of a court to hear and determine an issue. Not all searches are prohibited; only those that are unreasonable. The Fourth Amendment deals with the seizures of both persons and property. The U.S. Supreme Court imposed the Exclusionary Rule on the states in the case of Mapp v. Ohio. The Fruits of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine prevents the use of evidence that is tainted by illegal activities of law enforcement. The Fourth Amendment protects only persons, houses, papers, and effects. A search is a governmental intrusion into an area where a person has a…