Preview

marketing

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
942 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
marketing
FCC Assignment
Mackenzie Steger
April 21, 2014

Net Neutrality
Net neutrality basically means that Internet service providers and governments should treat all data on the Internet equally. Treating the Internet equally means to not discriminate or charge differentially by user, content, site, platform, application, type of attached equipment, and modes of communication. Another accepted term for net neutrality is "open internet" where you can use your internet connection for anything you wish at no additional charge and with no restrictions—this would be a net neutral environment. A "closed internet" is a situation where corporations can restrict what you see over an internet connection and charge for it. Regarding net neutrality in the United States, the FCC has laid out a series of rules and guidelines to follow. The four principles include accessing the lawful Internet content of their choice, running applications and use services of their choice, subject to the needs of law enforcement, connecting their choice of legal devices that do not harm the network, and competition among network providers, application and service providers, and content providers. This is the current law for the United States.
Although some are for net neutrality, there are many users against it. A big concern in regards to net neutrality is a concern for privacy. Users think that ISPs may have profit motives to analyze what their subscribers are viewing, and be able to use such information to their financial advantage. Innovation and Investment is another argument. Telecommunications providers such as telephone and cable companies, and some technology companies that supply networking gear, argue telecom providers should have the ability to provide preferential treatment in the form of tiered services. A third argument is user welfare. Some opponents of net neutrality argue that under the ISP market competition, paid-prioritization of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    We’ve spent a lot of time here at TLF talking about the sound economic arguments against net neutrality regulation. We argue that net neutrality regulation will result in worse consequences than leaving the internet relatively unregulated. But to me, the more important point is that net neutrality regulation is itself unjust.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On the other hand, there are several people who argue that net neutrality is unethical. They have their own arguments and…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is also a general disagreement among what the outcomes and effects of net neutrality will be on ISPs, the internet and consumers. For example, proponents state that market competition and anti-competitive laws are not enough to ensure net neutrality. On the other hand, opponents of net neutrality claim that the current standards are sufficient. Not to mention, both sides argue that their methods will encourage innovations while the alternative limits…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oddly enough, the opposition argues that net neutrality will reduce investment in the industry. They usually refer to a study by former AT&T advisor, Hal Singer. His study suggested that net neutrality reduces investment from internet service providers. In actuality, this is not true. If we look at the facts, we see that net neutrality will actually spur investment in the internet sector.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Net Neutrality Outline

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    a. Net Neutrality is best defined as a network design principle. The idea is that a maximally useful public information network aspires to treat all content, sites, and platforms equally. This allows the network to carry every form of information and support every kind of application. The principle suggests that information networks are often more valuable when they are less specialized – when they are a platform for multiple uses, present and future.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Kriens, S. (2006, November 29). Net Neutrality. Speech presented at Stanford Technology Venture Program, Stanford. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=1638…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Net Neutrality Rules

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    (Finley, K 2015). Dozen of Internet Service Providers, including the big companies like, Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon are against Net Neutrality because they say that the rules are too restrictive. Net Neutrality will prevent ISP's from doing what they want with all the content and traffic that they deliver. Internet Service Providers also claim Net Neutrality will hinder investment and innovation.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Net Neutrality

    • 3387 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Net Neutrality is a topic of debate and confusion in the United States. It draws supporters as diverse as the Christian Coalition and moveon.org, pits traditional telecommunications companies like Verizon and Comcast against Internet giants such as Yahoo! and Google, and gives politicians yet another platform to raise an ongoing liberal-conservative debate over government regulation. So what is all this talk about? Philosophically, Net Neutrality is an ethical framework to govern access to the Internet. It advocates no restrictions on content, sites, or platforms, on the kinds of equipment that may be attached, and on the modes of communication allowed. In 2005, the FCC embedded these principles into its policy with an objective to “encourage broadband deployment and preserve and promote the open and interconnected nature of the public Internet” (Policy Statement). This statement and proposed additional legislation is the source of continued controversy today. Fundamentally, the debate is grounded in opinions of necessity of Internet regulations and the repercussions of action or inaction. This paper will attempt to provide a context for the debate, a better understanding of the regulation and the possible implications, and a summary of the differing views.…

    • 3387 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    But, what the FCC isn’t taking into account is the millions of internet users that want to keep internet neutrality. With net neutrality maintained, users of the internet will have equal access to the internet, which will increase their total…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Health

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is for you to:1. become familiar with Net Neutrality.2. identify the impact of Net Neutrality on your daily life and use of the Internet.3. identify why people are for it and others oppose it.4. formulate your own opinion about Net Neutrality.Directions: Follow the step-by-step instructions and use Microsoft Word to respond to the questions below. Your response to questions one, two, and three should collectively be no less than 200 words (The word count excludes the text for the questions). All answers must be original – NO copy and pasting from websites! Also, you must also include in-text citations and cite any sources on a reference page using proper MLA or APA format.Complete a word count and post it on the bottom of the document. Be sure to indicate your name and date at the top of the document.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whether we accomplish this by turning ISPs into common carriers or by enforcing a standard non-discrimination rule with the internet, there has to be a zero tolerance for throttling of websites based off of extra fees charged by the customer-side internet provider. No matter what they may try to claim, the main reason the corporations that own our nation’s ISPs are fighting against net neutrality is because they want to make more money. If America backs down on this issue, the internet as we know it will be lost. As Nilay Patel said, “What happens now is entirely dependent on whether the FCC’s new chairman, Tom Wheeler, has the courage to stand up and finally say the right words — that broadband access is a telecommunications service that should be regulated just like landline phones.”Works…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    People who have argued for prioritizing the Internet or talking against net neutrality have argued that this does not ensure that top priority services, such as healthcare have a higher priority over sharing bandwidth pool with the public. While that is a great argument against it, the problem is that it can also be badly misused, and there is little promise that it would not be used for that. For example, it has recently been proven that Comcast throttled the bandwidth so that it steered people towards their video services, such as Netflix. It's nice to think that it would all be used for the good of the Internet, but most likely, it would be used to profit the bigger…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, many bills–up to 10[2]–have been proposed in opposition to Net Neutrality. People from large Internet Service Providers, (ISPs), like Comcast, AT&T and Verizon are fighting against Net Neutrality for their own gain. Without it, an ISP can choose to limit your access to the Internet. Some…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In addition, those who challenge net neutrality must fight the issue of the American citizen’s right of privacy. By giving all the control to the ISPs they will obtain the right to basically spy on our every move on the internet. This would be violating the Fourth Amendment, which states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”. Those in favor of abolishing net neutrality could argue that the ISP’s right to privacy is at stake as well. By…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is a great idea to have a neutral internet. People can argue to they blue on the face about internet neutrality but by doing so the government would have to set rules and generate a common ground for those who are in charge. After reading the articles Julius Genachowski and Kyle Mcslarrow, I can see there points. Julius argues that with out internet neutrality we would lock innovation, opportunity, and prosperity. Kyle argues that with government involvement it will slow down the process of technology and it will aloud others unlimited access and this will cause problem with it been over used. It also states that cable companies have demonstrated commitment to the policies that ensure all Americans to have affordable access to broadband.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays