This symbolizes what is usually called a “left handed marriage” which means a union of unequal’s, in which the woman was obliged to forfeit all the usual right of property and inheritance. Which is like us today as a morganatic marriage which is entered by a European royal prince and a commoner. This is most likely the cause of the two witnesses are present to validate the financial contract drawn up at the time of marriage. If the couple are in fact Giovanni di Nicolao Arnolfini and his wife Giovanna Cenami, there is no question of it being a marriage between unequal’s, as Giovanna was equally well connected. But in 1997 it was established that their marriage did not take place until 1447 - about thirteen years after the date of the painting, and six years after Jan van Eyck's death. However, his brother Michele appears to have entered a marriage, around the time of the painting. Other art historians think the painting might represent the wedding of Giovanni di Nicolao Arnolfini and his first wife Costanza
This symbolizes what is usually called a “left handed marriage” which means a union of unequal’s, in which the woman was obliged to forfeit all the usual right of property and inheritance. Which is like us today as a morganatic marriage which is entered by a European royal prince and a commoner. This is most likely the cause of the two witnesses are present to validate the financial contract drawn up at the time of marriage. If the couple are in fact Giovanni di Nicolao Arnolfini and his wife Giovanna Cenami, there is no question of it being a marriage between unequal’s, as Giovanna was equally well connected. But in 1997 it was established that their marriage did not take place until 1447 - about thirteen years after the date of the painting, and six years after Jan van Eyck's death. However, his brother Michele appears to have entered a marriage, around the time of the painting. Other art historians think the painting might represent the wedding of Giovanni di Nicolao Arnolfini and his first wife Costanza