He states: “Since we so diligently urge people to obey the Supreme Court’s decision of 1954 outlawing segregation in the public schools... One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” King’s appeal to the legitimacy of laws that are fair and lead to a positive outcome, such as the 1954 law enacted by the Supreme Court, indicates that although he opposes legislation that has undermined the black community, he earnestly embraces laws that benefit the welfare of all. In his appeal to the notion that all individuals must obey the legal and moral value of “just” laws, King intends to suggest that it is compulsory to disobey “unjust”
He states: “Since we so diligently urge people to obey the Supreme Court’s decision of 1954 outlawing segregation in the public schools... One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” King’s appeal to the legitimacy of laws that are fair and lead to a positive outcome, such as the 1954 law enacted by the Supreme Court, indicates that although he opposes legislation that has undermined the black community, he earnestly embraces laws that benefit the welfare of all. In his appeal to the notion that all individuals must obey the legal and moral value of “just” laws, King intends to suggest that it is compulsory to disobey “unjust”