Preview

Marx Historical Materialism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1078 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marx Historical Materialism
Marx’s Historical Materialism—a very short summary (with thanks to G. A. Cohen’s interpretive work)

Philosophy 166

1. The productive forces tend to develop throughout history. (The productive forces are the means available for transforming nature to satisfy human wants. Raw materials, tools, labor power, technological knowledge about how to produce goods with various inputs, are all examples of productive forces.) 2. The nature of the productive relations of a given society is explained by the level of development of its productive forces (to a far greater extent then the reverse). (The productive relations are relations involving people and control of productive forces. Examples: The capitalist hires workers. The boss owns the factory. The serfs born on a feudal manor are required by enforced custom to remain there and work sometimes for the benefit of the lord of the manor. As Marx states in the 1859 “Preface to the Critique of Political Economy,” “The sum total of these relations of production [in a given society] constitutes the economic structure of society.” The explanatory relation involved here is functional explanation. Example: An anthropologist might claim that the fact that the practice of rain dance rituals fosters or is functional for social cohesion explains the presence of rain dance rituals in a given society. To complete a functional explanation, the anthropologist needs to cite a causal mechanism the leads from being functional to being established in society. The anthropologist might observe that a social elite that desires social cohesion might see that rain dance rituals would foster social cohesion and act deliberately to install the practice. An auxiliary cause might be that what promotes social cohesion tends to make ordinary people happy and ordinary people, seeing (perhaps dimly) that rain dance rituals are linked to their happiness in this way, support the continuance of the practice. Here there are two cases to consider. In a stable

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    They say that history is told from the perspective of the conqueror, but for two renowned philosophers, history in general was formed because of certain factors. These philosophers are Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    This essay will be firstly looking at what Engels means by exploring historical materialism. I will implement what it is and show how it changed the feudal society. I will show how it connects to alienation, capital, and the individual production and individual appropriation. Second I will be touching on the advancement of technology and private ownership of production in regards to the fundamental contradictions in capitalism and I will explain how the contradictions came about. Third I will be explaining the two contradictions that arise from the fundamental contradiction, some of the things I will consider are the means of production and the mode of production. Lastly, I will show what Engels envisions as the ultimate outcome of the historical development of capitalism.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As described in the Communist Manifesto, there was a division of classes that were between the proletariats that were the wageworkers and were used for labor purposes, and the bourgeoisie who were considered the capitalist class and the ones who were at fault for exploitation of the proletariats. The writing in the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, after many years has a form in which it resonates in contemporary society. Having different types of social and working classes has become more relevant throughout society and has caused for issues to arise. Although the ways they are perceived and named have changed throughout the years in different locations, the existence of these classes is still consistent throughout. There…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bernard Marx is the central figure of the novel. Huxley introduces Bernard by giving the reader the knowledge of what's on Bernard's mind. He explains how Bernard is lovesick, jealous and angry. After analyzing Bernard, one can determine that he wants things that he cannot have and he is too over-ambitious. Bernard also lacks confidence and is often anxious because he always feels like he is not good enough. Bernard's horrible attitude is revealed when "Bernard left the room with a swagger as he banged the door behind him, in the thought that he stood alone, embattled against the order of things, elated by the intoxicating consciousness of his individual significance and importance." (Huxley, 47) In this quote, Huxley reveals Bernard's anger and attitude. It also determines his lack of care of others as it is clear that he is very self-centered. It is clear that Bernard will be a key character that will shape the direction of this novel because of all that unconfidence and anxiety that is ready to release and explode out of his system. An event will likely occur that would change Bernard's personality and actions. By the change of Bernard's motivations and thoughts, the story itself will also change as he has a great effect on it.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Karl Marx and his developed theory of Marxism played a vital role in influencing Lenin’s efforts to overthrow the Provisional Government eventually leading to the Russian Revolution of 1917.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    of history, in away there will be no new history created. The victory of the proletariat and the birth of a classless society, therefore creates a Utopian end of history which is the goal of all previous historical events.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx and Mills

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Stuart Mill suggests that a person's ethical decision-making process should be based solely upon the amount of happiness that the person can receive. Although Mill fully justifies himself, his approach lacks certain criteria for which happiness can be considered. Happiness should be judged, not only by pleasure, but by pain as well. This paper will examine Mill's position on happiness, and the reasoning behind it. Showing where there are agreements and where there are disagreements will critique the theory of Utilitarianism. By showing the problems that the theory have will reveal what should make up ethical decision-making. John Stuart Mill supports and explains his reasoning in his book, Utilitarianism. Mill illustrates the guidelines of his theory. Mill defines utilitarianism as the quest for happiness. His main point is that one should guide his or her judgements by what will give pleasure. Mill believes that a person should always seek to gain pleasure and reject pain. Utilitarianism also states that the actions of a person should be based upon the "greatest happiness principle". This principle states that ethical actions command the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Mill further explores the need for pleasure by noting "a being of higher faculties requires more to make him happy." . He acknowledges that some pleasures are more alluring than others are. He adds to this by making known that when placing value in things to calculate pleasure, not only quantity important but quality as well. Mill's criteria for happiness is easily understood, some statements that he gives are questionable. John Stuart Mill plainly laid out what he believes that the basis for ethical decision-making. First, the pursuit of pleasure is directly related to happiness. This idea can be easily accepted. It is natural for a person to focus his goals on things that will bring him pleasure. It would be absurd if someone's goal in life was to be poor and…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The capitalist system caused the alienation of the workers, therefore causing them not to be able to live to the fullest…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Re: Marx and whether his theories apply to what is happening in today's modern workplace…

    • 1096 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime is not confined to the working class. Capitalism encourages capitalists to commit white-collar and corporate crimes.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism and Mao

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. What specific development in Hunan province reinforced Mao’s convictions about the peasantry as a revolutionary force?…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill Vs Marx

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Stuart Mill and Karl Marx each had their own reasons for what makes the world unjust. Mill thought that it was unjust to deprive anyone of personal liberty, property and other things which belong by law. He also thought that it was unjust to deprive anyone of their own happiness. Marx on the other hand believed that property, classes, competition, and inequality all made the world an unjust place. He thought that these things separated the people and didn't allow people to reach their full potential and happiness. In order to make the world more just Marx believed that we needed to change these things, he created ten different proposals to create a change in our world. He believed that…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    [ii] Brophy, James M., Perspectives from the past : primary sources in Western civilizations; Karl Marx, “Estranged Labor”, pg. 251-231…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    a. Social problems result from the ways in which society operates: connect this to the 3 sociological theories on how society is viewed to “operate”. There are many different opinions on what causes poverty. For instance, according to the structural functionalist perspective, poverty is caused by institutional breakdown. Examples of this are economic institutions that don’t provide enough jobs or pay, education institutions that don’t provide the members of society with enough education and skills to find good employment, family institutions, and government institution that fail to offer enough support. According to the conflict perspective, poverty results from the power of the Bourgeoisie (the employer) over the proletariat (the worker).…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The sources were used in the thought process of the writing, not necessarily for support. For example, the biographies were to see if there were bias in Marx and Friedrich’s lives due to their standard of living. Including this in the essay wouldn’t have an effect on the impact of the reader or the goal/message, however they did influence my thought process. The direct sources were to show me the ideology of Marx. I didn’t pick apart his writing itself, so direct citation wasn’t required. Saying that Marx believed this and it was evident in the manifesto and Das Kapital was sufficient support. The main target of the paper was to convince the reader that Marx’s works and ideas are possible, plausible, and worth discussing. The main target…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays