Preview

Marx On Religion

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
842 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marx On Religion
Marx is very critical of religion. He opens his critique of Hegel by saying that “man makes religion, religion does not make man” (115). State and society produce religion and man turns to it as a way of gain self-esteem and self-consciousness, but it is not needed for man to thrive. Marx believes that man uses religion as a crutch and even refers to it as the “opium of the people” (115). He believes that religion provides illusions for how world should and does work and as a coping mechanism for suffering. However, these illusions are fake and religion acts as a sedative in the willingness of people to confront their own oppression in society. Religion provides the logical and moral justification of oppression and masks it as “true” happiness. But Marx argues that in order to have real happiness people must abandon the illusions religion provides. In other words, people must be critical of religion in order to understand how the world really works. I think the same concept can be applied to how people view capitalism in America and how it actually works. Marx argues that in a capitalistic society, things only have value because humans give them value. Things (commodities) are given value through the mental, physical, and …show more content…
On page 430, Marx says “…the development of modern industry must progressively turn the scale in favor of the capitalist against the working man…” This means that industry does not work in favor of the laborer, but instead the capitalist. This can be seen in the composition of capital. Capital is money invested to make more money. For example, money invested in better machinery or in the means of production. While there has been a progressive increase in fixed capital, the pace of increase in the other part of capital (wages and purchase of labor) has not been as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The most influential sociologist who advocates the view that religion acts as a radical force promoting social change is Max Weber. Weber’s book ‘The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism’ examines how Calvinism (a form of Protestantism) helped change society into a capitalist state starting in Northern Europe. Calvinists believed in ‘predestination’ meaning that God had already chosen your place in either heaven or hell before you were born. This was a problem since no one knew who was amongst the ‘elect’ so Calvinists developed a set of values which were mainly hard work, thrift and accumulation of wealth. In Weber’s view the spirit of capitalism meant that an object was seen as the acquisition of more money and investment thus Calvinism brought social change in the 16th century in the form of Capitalism as we now know it. Karl Marx’s view differs from Weber since according to Marx religion is a conservative ideology – a set of ruling class ideas which are shaped by and legitimate class inequalities in society’s economic base. Marxists recognise that religious ideas can have relative autonomy which means being partly independent of the economic base of society. This results in religion having a dual character and sometimes being used as a force for social change and stability. Engels agrees with Marx that religion is conservative and explains that religion…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Marxists Disagree: Religion functions serve capitalism. Karl Marx – sees religion as an ideology that is used as a weapon by the ruling class to justify suffering of poor as ‘god-given’…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grand Inquisitor Analysis

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marx believed that religion is analogous to an opiate or an illusion of happiness that common people feel they must have to endure a world in which they do not have or are prevented from having true happiness. Plato’s view of social class dynamics was that those in power had to invent noble lies and pious frauds to keep the common people in the state of somnolence and ignorance for which they were suited. Khomeini, however, believed that religion is necessary to provide a political society with moral order and stability, something that a liberal secular society could not do. In fact, Khomeini viewed religion as a panacea for all social ills. Critics of this view argue that using religion…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are four types of fats. Although there are bad fats and better fats, they are necessary to support cell growth and give your body energy. The bad fats are saturated fats and trans fats which are more solid at room temperature like a stick of butter and trans fats are liquid such as vegetable oil. Theses fats raise bad cholesterol levels and clog arteries putting you at risk for heart disease. Monounsaturated fats and polyunsaturated fats are the better fats that can lower bad cholesterol levels and are beneficial when consumed in moderation.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx a Marxist sees religion as an illusion and that the phenomenon of religion is part of what Marx refers to as an alienation of people which causes conflict in society. He saw society as divided into two social classes with one dominating the other. And he saw religion as promoting inequalities and class conflict in society. He argues that religion is part of a dominant ideology that is the idea that religion is a tool used by the bourgeoisie (Ruling class) to convince the working class to accept low paid jobs and so exploits the working class, reproducing and reinforcing false consciousness.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Charles Cooley

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages

    4.) Smith, Cyril. 2005. “Marx Myths and Legends”. Karl Marx and Religion. WEBSITE accessed March 21, 2012. http://marxmyths.org/cyril-smith/article2.htm…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He uses information that has obviously been aware to many. When Marx disagrees with the private ownership of property, such technique is fairly visible. He believes that “Property, in its present form, is based on the antagonism of capital and wage labour.” For the Bourgeois society, “the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man’s own labour, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence.” However, Marx claims that in this Bourgeois society, the workers do not work the sake of themselves but for the sake of the bourgeois and that “All that we want to do away with is the miserable character of this appropriation, under which the labourer lives merely to increase capital, and is allowed to live only in so far as the interest of the ruling class requires it.” According to Marx, it is logic that a labour should work for the purpose of working. Thus, he believes that labours working for the Bourgeois lost their sole purpose of existence-work. He claims that in the Bourgeois society, the Proletarians are used to increase capital and the Bourgeois property only, and become useless after they have done their job. In the Communist society, “accumulated labour is but a means to widen, to enrich, to promote the existence of the labourer.” Through the use of reasoning concepts that were obvious to the readers even before it was ever reasoned in this document, Marx persuades the audience that the function of the Bourgeoisie society is…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx vs. Weber

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Marx’s labor theory of value, the value of a product is not it the raw materials, but in the labor of the worker who produced it. Consequently, in Marx’s eyes, the worker deserves most of the profit from the sale of that product. Yet, in a capitalist society, the owner or employer receive most of the economic rewards.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx did not believe in god. He was well known for his ideas about alienation. He believed everyone was born with a creative spirit, i.e. species being. Conflict is to fight or to battle, Karl Marx was the founder of conflict theory, according to sources conflict theory argues that the competition of groups and individuals for power and wealth is a fundamental process shaping the social structure. Conflict is manifested through Marx by who gets what and why, Marx argued that the labor market was shaped by class conflict. The capitalist class, which owned the means of production, promoted division of labor to maximize their profits and to disempowered workers.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx believed that the poor were working their fingers to the bone to create value for society, while the rich simply siphoned off a portion of that value, which had been created by the poor. The rich do this without putting any effort into creating this value or their own value. In order for society’s productivity to be maximized, rich people’s syphoning off of a share of production must be done away with. Instead, the means of production (factories, stores, natural resources, etc.)—which rich people owned and used in order to siphon off poor people’s productivity—ought to be owned by the people themselves as a collective group. This prevents the rich from using their ownership position to syphon off a portion of society’s productione. Now, the people would continue to do all the producing, but the results of production would benefit only the people. In other words, each member of society must do what he or she can to produce the good and services society…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religious Experience

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marx’s challenges to religious experience arguments are sociological; he suggested that the origins of religious experience are to be found in society.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx and Max Weber all offer a wide array of thoughts and ideas regarding to religion. Firstly, Emile Durkheim's views of religion will be explained. Durkheim chose to adopt the idea that if religion gave birth to everything essential in society it is because society is the soul of religion (Cosman, 1973, p. 191). Thus, Durkheim chose to view religion as a function which can strengthen social bonds whilst also integrating individuals into society. Durkheim also believed that religion is divided up into two separate sections – the sacred and the profane. The sacred consisted of rites, behavior or objects of reverence that religious belief deemed special, whilst the profane was deemed as everything and anything else in the world which did not have any religious meaning or function (Giddens 1972, p.243). Both of these categories depend on each other for survival; the sacred cannot survive without the profane to support it and vice versa. Karl Marx chose to adopt a…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death is a process in life that will be experienced by everyone at some point, and hopefully at a very mature age. The reality is that no one knows when that time will come or how it will happen. For the terminally ill, death is in the near future and is a sobering reality. Therefore, when it does happen, people need to know that they will have options, and know that death does not have to be an agonizing end. They can choose to endure the annihilating pain that comes with the disease and allow it to take its natural course or choose to end it, surrounded by their loved ones. The “right to die” (Sanburn 50) it the manner they choose should be a basic right for every human being, a personal choice and an outlet for those who seek relief from an excruciating death sentence.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Religion it the opium of the masses” is one of the most frequently paraphrased statements of the German economist Karl Marx, “the father of communism”. The meaning of this statement is that religion is the equivalent of opium (a type of drug) to make masses of people feel better. Marx quoted that “religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless wold, and the soul of the soulless condition.”…

    • 526 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays