Preview

Marx v. Weber

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1437 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marx v. Weber
Comparative Essay
Karl Marx and Max Weber
Boring title

SSCI 501 – Great Ideas: Classics of Social Theory
October 1, 2013 German sociologists, Karl Marx and Max Weber, each both had theories about how capitalism evolved in society aswas well as what social inequality is. In this essay, I will explain the theories of these two sociologists in these areas and show how each had merit based on what we know today. O.K introduction but no real thesis.) My thesis (Aha!) for this paper is that capitalism breeds social inequality. Though social inequality can exist outside of capitalism, with capitalism social inequality is an inherent part of the system. Without inequality, there can be no capitalism and with capitalism there can be no equality. Marx believed at a fundamental level that capitalism was inevitable. He viewed society’s economic system as a sociological evolution. In order for society to realize the greatest economic system (socialism), society would first have to rise to capitalism, see it fail and proceed onward. For this reason, Marx welcomed capitalism. Marx describes this sociological evolution as three phases. The first phase describes the move from tribal ownership (family based economic system, hunting and gathering) to ancient communal ownership. This second phase is seen when tribes unite and form cities due to population increases, etc. The third phase described by Marx prior to the onset of capitalism was feudalism. In this phase there were commanding classes over serf (or slave) classes (McIntosh, 1997). (True, but not pertinent to the “orgins” in the sense of the “Primitive Accumulation.”) How will we know of Marx was on the mark when it comes to the rise and fall of capitalism? We live in a capitalistic society currently and I doubt in our lifetime we will see the fall of this economic system, so one might say it’s impossible to know if Marx’s theory would wind up being accurate. I

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx shocked the world with his own publication, The Manifesto in 1848, which sharply contradicted the visions of Smith and the emergence of the Industrial Revolution (Heilbroner, 1999). Marx concepts of unification without social class for the good of all people were communicated and the birth of communism was realized. Unlike Smith, who believed that the division of labor increased productivity, Marx believed that labor becomes a commodity and power rested in the hands of those who controlled production (Armor, 1997). Marx believed that the pending Industrial Revolution would create havoc and confusion to the capitalists' society…

    • 1263 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marx believed that capitalism contained the seeds of its own destruction. He described how the wealth of the bourgeoisie depended on the work of the proletariat. Therefore, capitalism requires an underclass. But Marx predicted that the continued exploitation of this underclass would create great resentment. Eventually the proletariat would lead a revolution against the bourgeoisie.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They compare the bourgeoisie to a sorcerer who has lost his grip on the powers he once commanded, unable to control the consequences of his actions. It gives the impression of an unstable class system tenuously clinging to a doomed economic market, which seems to imply that there was a true sense of hope of toppling the social hierarchy. To a modern reader, Marx seems either incredibly hopeful or somewhat naive to underestimate the impact of capitalism on the world. His reliance on the inevitability of socialism indicates that the true implications of capitalism were not yet clear during his time, or perhaps shows the strength of the people’s desperation political, social, and economic equality. The Communist dream of a highly centralized community free of social hierarchy or private property emerged directly as a result from the divisive class system of the time period.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A major argument that Marx put across in his scripts was that capitalism would force society to polarise, causing two classes within society, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. These classes were at both extremes of the social spectrum, the bourgeoisie been the rich "fat cats" who reeped the fruits of capitalism, they were normally the factory or…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the mid 1800’s two men by the names of Karl Marx and Friedrech Engels wrote a book called “The Communist Manifesto”. In this book Marx proposed that capitalism was a system full of flaws and…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Karl Marx published his Communist Manifesto in 1848. This document outlined his theory of Socialism. Socialism would be the elimination of wages and classes throughout society. Once the economic success of a nation reached the point where everyone could have whatever they needed people would begin to voluntarily work towards the production of goods. People would do this purely in order to meet the needs of society. Marx also argued that the process of this occurring would entirely be possible peacefully, eventually occurring as time passed and capitalist economies advanced, thus prospering to the extent that the necessary conditions are met. This transition would be in large part carried out by proletariat, workers or the working class. Marx’s…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx claims that capitalism was updated, creates alienation, and its self- subvert. He believed that the capitalist system would disappear because their tendency to accumulate wealth in a few hands would cause growing crises due to oversupply and an increase in unemployment. For Marx, the contradiction between technological advances and the resulting increase in production efficiency and reduced purchasing power would prevent acquiring additional quantities of products, it would be the cause of the collapse of capitalism.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This created a theory called Conflict Theory. Marx believed that capitalism was the reason for social inequality between the proletariats and bourgeoisie. He believes conflict is strictly economic in that everyone is judged and treated based on their status or wealth. Marx wrote…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx and Max Weber

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Karl Marx and Max Weber are two important names when thinking of sociological theory. Both men had strong views about our society. Weber’s approach to studying social life will be looked at. Then, Weber’s study of rationalization will be the main point of interest. His theory of rationalization showed us why people acted as they did. As with Weber, Marx’s approach to studying social life will be examined. Next, his theory of the capitalist mode of production will be explored. This paper will discuss his theories of the struggles between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, and how they could be solved.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the nineteenth century, Karl Marx and Max Weber were two of the most influential sociologists. Both of them tried to explain social change having place in a society at that time. Their view on this from one hand is very different, but on the other it had a lot of similarities.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A general search of the word capitalist returned with the one common theme from several different viewpoints. The term capitalist, like an investor, was continuously described as a financier of resources into a business or venture. They are considered to possess a significant amount of vested monetary interest into an enterprise in efforts to receive a profitable return. The partnership appears sound and a fair exchange for both business owners and employees alike. However, it is unfortunate when capitalists take the road of abusive exploitation in managing its employees just to gain a profit or market share. This particular stance of capitalism is very similar to philosophy portrayed by Karl Marx.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To start with this essay, first I would like to define what social inequality and capitalism are. There are various types of social inequality, aging discrimination, cruelty to animals, racial, gender inequality, etc. According to Hradil, he defined social inequality as to fulfill the general accepted of life goal faced in unequal opportunities, it generally refers to the uneven distribution of material wealth in a society. Because of the general accepted of life goal, which desires of people, not only one, therefore the structure of social inequality is very complicated. To analyze this complicated structure of social inequality, Hradil suggested first is to find out what is the dimension of unequal living condition with the similar aspect of different life goal, take “rich” as an example of life goal, but in fact this is equal to “money”, money is the unfair dimension of chasing richness. After having the concept of life goal and the similar aspect of unequal living conditions, we can step forward to identify the social positions. Different unequal living conditions have different importances to different…

    • 2002 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ang pagkain ng mani

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (1) Contracting to Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim, Max Weber proposes that society is neither driven by social conflict, nor it is sui-generis. Society is made up of actors, those who perform action (Social Action) and accordingly form relationship with each other developing family, kinship, etc.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays