Preview

May 2013. Theory of Knowledge Prescribed Titles. Instruction to Candidates

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
364 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
May 2013. Theory of Knowledge Prescribed Titles. Instruction to Candidates
May 2013
Theory of knowledge prescribed titles Instructions to candidates
Your theory of knowledge essay for examination must be submitted to your teacher for authentication. It must be written on one of the six titles (questions) provided below. You may choose any title, but are recommended to consult with your teacher. Your essay will be marked according to the assessment criteria published in the Theory of Knowledge guide. The focus of your essays should be on knowledge issues. Where appropriate, refer to other parts of your IB programme and to your experiences as a knower. Always justify your statements and provide relevant examples to illustrate your arguments. Pay attention to the implications of your arguments, and remember to consider what can be said against them. If you use external sources, cite them according to a recognized convention. Note that statements in quotations in these titles are not necessarily authentic: they present a real point of view but may not be direct quotes. It is appropriate to analyse them but it is unnecessary, even unwise, to spend time on researching a context for them. Examiners mark essays against the title as set. Respond to the title exactly as given; do not alter it in any way. Your essay must be between 1200 and 1600 words in length, double spaced and typed in size 12 font.

1. In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences? 2. “Only seeing general patterns can give us knowledge. Only seeing particular examples can give us understanding.” To what extent do you agree with these assertions? 3. “The possession of knowledge carries an ethical responsibility.” Evaluate this claim. 4. The traditional TOK diagram indicates four ways of knowing. Propose the inclusion of a fifth way of knowing selected from intuition, memory or imagination, and explore the knowledge issues it may raise in two areas of knowledge. 5. “That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In this essay, John M. Barry uses antithesis to display a contrast in his thoughts and the assuming thoughts of the readers. In doing this, the author is not only able to show the readers the different sides of how scientists are perceived by people, but as well as how they actually are in the world of scientific research. The author collates certainty and uncertainty as an example for the readers to view that scientists of the world are just like them. Scientists contain “certainty, [which] creates strength, and uncertainty, [which] creates weakness” (Barry). In using these disparities, Barry is showing the readers that “science teaches us to doubt” (Barry). By elaborating on the concepts of certainty and uncertainty, readers are able to see…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lolololololololol

    • 3943 Words
    • 16 Pages

    You should also use your own knowledge to comment on the evidence in the sources. (25 marks)…

    • 3943 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    With this lesson, we begin a new unit on epistemology, which is the philosophical study of knowledge claims. In this first lesson on epistemology, Dew and Foreman discuss some of the basic issues raised in the study of epistemology and then discuss the nature of knowledge itself. They consider questions such as, “What do we mean when we say we know something?” “What exactly is knowledge?…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Malcolm X Facts

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There are many ways that experts in a discipline disagree with one another; given the same facts. Through various areas of knowledge, there has been countless evidence of the possibility of disagreement between experts. Usually people who are adept in their field think very differently than other experts in their discipline. They may interpret certain facts differently, and with divergent thinking comes disagreements. In this essay, with reference to human sciences and history, I will explain how experts can sometimes have disputes within a discipline, given the same facts.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Also mentioned will be a number of theories and concepts, here is a few brief definitions of those mentioned in this essay.…

    • 2018 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Final

    • 57372 Words
    • 230 Pages

    Bibliography: Sosa, Ernest [1980]: “The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence Versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge.” In Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 5: Studies in Epistemology. Minneapolis MN: University of Minneapolis Press: 3–25. Stace, W.T. [1967]: “Science and the Physical World.” In Man Against Darkness and Other Essays. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Tye, Michael [2009]: “A New Look at the Speckled Hen.” In Analysis 60, April: 258–63. Yolton, John W. [1970]: Locke and the Compass of Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.…

    • 57372 Words
    • 230 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    In What Ways May Disagreement Aid the Pursuit of Knowledge in the Natural and Human Sciences?…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Schommer-Aikens & Hutter’s (2002) deliberates the methodology using a pair of surveys from the Schommer Epistemological Questionnaire (Schommer, 1990). The outcome of the examination of the participant’s answers from this questionnaire is exhibiting their beliefs as well thought-out by the surveys and sample articles starting with the slightest controversy to the greatest (Schommer-Aikens & Hutter, 2002). The essay confers the difference of opinion between the uses of epistemological beliefs when searching for…

    • 2088 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ENV100

    • 494 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Doubt is our product since it is the best means of competing with the ‘body’ of facts that exists in the mind of the general public. It is also the means of establishing controversy”…

    • 494 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Journal Analysis

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Feldman addressed how assumptions become scientific knowledge by stating “Sometimes we know things by reasoning or inference. When we know some facts and see that those facts support some further fact, we can come to know that further fact. Scientific knowledge, for example, seems to arise from inferences from observational data” (Feldman, 2003, p. 3). Understanding how assumptions move into scientific knowledge it becomes apparent how these assumptions are qualified in research. The authors used regression analysis to quantify the assumptions of the participants as they relate to knowledge, learning, multiple perspectives, and ultimately the development of epistemological beliefs. This analysis will further identify philosophical assumptions underlying the research; explain the practical significance of these assumptions and their effect on its applicability to other authors and post-positive thinkers.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To take information and break it down to further along knowledge on the subject is detrimental to pushing society. We gave information all the time through primary research or secondary research. The ability to analyze that information and then have the knowledge to explain will allow you to be a thought leader amongst your peers. This essay will define critical thinking, explain the importance, describe the difference between scientific and supernatural claims, and finally explain the importance of critical thinking for the progress of science.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Journal Article Analysis

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A Week 3 assignment in the class, PHL/717 Constructing Meaning, required a philosophical analysis of an article in the Journal of Psychology. The article investigated how the connection between knowledge and learning influenced individuals to think about controversial everyday issues. The analysis included identifying philosophical assumptions, explaining practical significance and applicability, and relating assumptions and methodology to class readings.…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    `As a student and a scholar, I feel more and more confident about my opinions and beliefs as time goes on. One thing stands out in my mind though, and luckily, I am unable to forget it. When I compare what I have learned as a requirement versus what I have experienced in life, I have no doubts as to which I would defend more ardently. Though I am quite sure that I am not being misinformed in my scholastic pursuits, I almost never feel the need to zealously defend what I have learned in school. However, when a subject arises that I have experienced or have first-hand knowledge of; I am able to defend it or refute it with a passion that would otherwise not exist. This passion arises from life experience and though these experiences may differ from person to person, it does give an air of assured certainty to those who have this first-hand knowledge.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral Truth

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Finally in the chapter, he explores the ideas of consensus and consciousness. He explains that scientific consensus as scientific controversy that work needs to be done. For example, “moral controversy proves that there can be no such thing as moral truth while moral consensus shows only that…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Common Sense and Science

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This discussion provides dissimilarity between common sense and science; the relationship of common sense and beliefs; and a reflection of how a scholarly-practitioner can relate all of these to the field of critical thinking. It further explores the application of “ belief perseverance” and an explanation of how it interferes with critical thinking; and one strategy that flags critical thinking in the presence one’s belief system. The discussion will conclude with an analysis of common sense, science and beliefs relate to critical thinking, and the significance of critical thinking to a scholarly-practitioner (PPPA 8000 “Common Sense and Science”, 2013).…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics