Although the two did have many similarities, they also differed from each other. One …show more content…
The Easter Islanders did not have a severe climate change. One of their problems was that they had to completely rely on themselves because they did not have any trade partners and so they didn’t have a way of getting different foods, wood, etc. They did, however, have hostile neighbors. For example, Peruvian ships captured half of their population and Europeans brought over new diseases they did not have antibodies for. Although they seemed doomed from the start, they were able to adapt to their environment. For example, they couldn’t catch many fish so they ate birds and rats and they stopped burning wood when trees on the island were endangered and burned grasses instead. In my opinion, the environmental damage they caused was the most significant. They wiped out birds, used to be biggest breeding ground, 21 species of trees making items such as rope to erect their statues and burning bodies. The trees that vanished from the island were up to 100 feet tall and gone by 1722. On page 106, the author states that “Deforestation must have begun sometime after human arrival.” They just didn’t think of what they would do when all their resources were